Low-dose aspirin therapy is not a reason for repeating head computed tomographic scans in traumatic brain injury: a prospective study

Background

Most studies have categorized all antiplatelet drugs into one category. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and outcomes in patients on low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) therapy.

Methods

Patients with traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head computed tomography (CT) were prospectively enrolled. Patients on prehospital low-dose (81 mg) aspirin therapy were matched with patients exclusive of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy using propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, and neurological examination. Outcome measures were progression on RHCT and subsequent neurosurgical intervention.

Results

A total of 144 patients who had intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT scan (ASA group: 72; No-ASA group: 72) were enrolled. The mean age was 72.8 ± 11.7 years, 59.7% were male, and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2–3). There was no difference in progression on RHCT (25% in ASA versus 16.6% in no-ASA), change in management as a result of RHCT (1.4% versus 1.4%), RHCT as a result of neurological decline (0 versus 1.4%), discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (15 [14–15] versus 15 [14–15]), and mortality (0 versus 1.4%) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Low-dose aspirin therapy is not associated with progression of initial insult on RHCT or clinical deterioration. Prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy as a sole criterion should not warrant a routine repeat head CT in traumatic brain injury.     

Clinical outcome 10 years after attempted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 856 patients

Objectives. This study reports the 10-year outcome of 856 consecutive patients who underwent attempted coronary angioplasty at the Thoraxcenter during the years 1980 to 1985.

Background. Coronary balloon angioplasty was first performed in 1977, and this procedure was introduced into clinical practice at the Thoraxcenter in 1980. Although advances have been made, extending our knowledge of the long-term outcome in terms of survival and major cardiac events remains of interest and a valuable guide in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods. Details of survival, cardiac events, symptoms and medication were retrospectively obtained from the Dutch civil registry, medical records or by letter or telephone or from the patient's physician and entered into a dedicated data base. Patient survival curves were constructed, and factors influencing survival and cardiac events were identified.

Results. The procedural clinical success rate was 82%. Follow-up information was obtained in 837 patients (97.8%). Six hundred forty-one patients (77%) were alive, of whom 334 (53%) were symptom free, and 254 (40%) were taking no antianginal medication. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.6% to 92.4%) and 78% (95% CI 75.0% to 81.0%), respectively, and the respective freedom from significant cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty) was 57% (95% CI 53.4% to 60.6%) and 36% (95% CI 32.4% to 39.6%). Factors that were found to adversely influence 10-year survival were age ≥60 years (≥60 years [67%], 50 to 59 years [82%], <50 years [88%]), multivessel disease (multivessel disease [69%], single-vessel disease [82%]), impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction <50% [57%], ≥50% [80%]) and a history of previous myocardial infarction (previous myocardial infarction [72%], no previous infarction [83%]). These factors were also found to be independent predictors of death during the follow-up period by a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Other factors tested, with no influence on survival, were gender, procedural success and stability of angina at the time of intervention.

Conclusion. The long-term prognosis of patients after coronary angioplasty is good, particularly in those <60 years old with single-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function. The majority of patients are likely to experience a further cardiac event in the 10 years after their first angioplasty procedure.