Clinical, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging findings in carpal tunnel syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to compare them with electrophysiological findings. METHODS: Routine motor and sensory nerve conduction examinations and needle EMG were performed in 42 hands of 22 patients, who were clinically diagnosed as having CTS in at least one wrist. RESULTS: Of 29 wrists with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS, MRI could detect abnormality in 18 wrists (62%). Median nerve was found to be abnormal in MRI in 1 of 2 wrists with suspected clinical symptoms and proven CTS by electrophysiological examination. MRI was abnormal in 1 of 4 wrists with normal clinical and electrophysiological examination. MRI was abnormal in 46, 7% of wrists with mild CTS, in 61.6% of moderate CTS and in 100% of severe CTS. Volar bulging of the flexor retinaculum was detected in a single wrist with severe CTS. Enlargement of median nerve was observed in 3 of 5 severe CTS. CONCLUSION: MRI could be useful in the diagnosis of unproven cases in CTS. It also provides anatomical information that correlate well with electrophysiological findings in regard of the severity of median nerve compression.     

Premedication with H1 and H2 blocking agents reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Objective:Patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery frequently complain about postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Whether pretreatment with H₁ and H₂ blocking agents reduces the incidence of PONV remains controversial. To answer this question, we performed a randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of a premedication with H₁ and H₂ receptor antagonists. Material and Subjects:1149 patients (both sexes) undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to three treatment groups and one control group. Patients in the treatment groups were premedicated with the following H₁ + H₂ receptor antagonists:Group 1 (n = 335): 5 mg/kg cimetidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 2 (n = 337): 1.25 mg/kg ranitidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 3 (n = 316): 300 mg ranitidine p.o. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 1 to 2 h before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 4 (n = 161): 20 ml saline solution i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaPatients from the treatment groups 1, 2 and 3 received regional or general anaesthesia depending on the clinical decision. All control patients received general anaesthesia consisting of fentanyl, a thiobarbiturate, enflurane, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and vecuronium. Results:The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 8.5%, 6.8% and 5.4% in patients from the treatment groups (1, 2 and 3) who underwent general anaesthesia (n = 545), with no statistically significant differences between groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the control group (n = 161) was 28.3% (nausea) and 27.5% (vomiting), respectively. In patients who underwent regional anaesthesia (n = 443), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 2.5% and 1.1%, respectively. Conclusions:Premedication with H₁ and H₂ blocking agents significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.     

Right ventricular free wall perforation during pericardiocentesis,and an inappropriate device selection for percutaneous treatment

Right ventricular (RV) perforation is a rare but life‐threatening complication of pericardiocentesis and is usually treated surgically. We presented a case of RV free wall perforation, which occurred during pericardiocentesis and tried to be closed percutaneously with the Amplatzer vascular plug‐III (AVP‐III) device. The occluder device sealed the perforation, but it was in an insecure position; therefore, the patient underwent surgical repair. As an AVP‐III device, with a middle disk thicker than the RV myocardium, it may cause the RV myocardium to stretch outwards, so it should not be used for the treatment of RV perforation by the transcatheter way.     

Aesthetic Male Facial Skeletal Surgery

Craniofacial surgery concepts developed originally for reconstruction may also be applied to aesthetic surgery. The facial skeleton is an important component of appearance and may be modified using common craniofacial surgery techniques. Three representative male patients are presented, who each desired an improvement in his appearance. The techniques used were different and combined orthognathic and remodeling procedures. Aesthetic male facial skeletal surgery was beneficial in these selected cases. The results were well received and without complications. Surprisingly, we have found that male skeletal aesthetic patients did not have unrealistic expectations and were pleasant to manage pre- and postoperatively.     

Expenditure and reliability of ICD/ICPM-coding in routine surgery

Because of the changing legal basis for hospital reimbursement German hospitals have to classify their cases by ICD-9- and an adapted ICPM code (OPS-301) and have to give an advance calculation of the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) starting from January 1996. From January 1st 1996 to the 31st of December 1996 all diagnoses and therapies in a general surgery hospital were classified according to ICD-9- and ICPM (OPS-301). This coding was not computer-assisted but was controlled in a multiple step process. As a consequence 4.6% incorrect codes were found which were irrelevant for reimbursement. 7.2% misclassifications relevant for funding were detected with an obvious learning curve within the first 6 months. The calculation of the distribution of diagnoses and therapies reveals that 80 to 85% of the total spectrum in a general surgery hospital (including vascular and thoracic surgery) were covered by 200 diagnostic and therapeutic codes, respectively. This investigation confirms the need for a physician-based control system of diagnostic and therapeutic coding to minimise economic risks.     

Immunization of renal transplant recipients with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae, a common pathogen leading to pneumonia, is a cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients. Vaccination against this agent can be recommended for immunosuppressed patients, including those with chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome and renal transplant recipients; however, a diminished immune response and loss of protective antibodies have been observed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our prospective study, the efficacy and side effects of polyvalent pneumococcal vaccination were investigated in renal transplant recipients. A total of 21 patients (6 female, 15 male) with well-functioning renal allografts, who had transplant surgery at least 2 months before, were included in the study. The patients were stratified according to the immunosuppressive protocol and 8 received double, while 13 received triple, immunosuppressive agents. After obtaining basal serum samples, all cases were vaccinated with the 0.5 mL intramuscular administration of polyvalent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumo 23 Pasteur Merieux, lot No: K 1131). RESULTS: Following a mean of 6 wk in all patients and also a mean of 12 wk in 12 patients, serum samples were again obtained to measure pneumococcal antibodies. Antibody titers following 6 and 12 wk of vaccination were significantly higher, as compared with basal values in all patients, except one. These titers did not show any statistically significant difference between double and triple therapies. There was no significant difference between the 12th and 6th wk postvaccination antibody titers. No systemic or local adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Pneumococcal vaccination is safe and effective in patients with well-functioning renal allografts, at least in the short term. This vaccination policy may be useful for preventing invasive pneumococcal disease in immunosuppressed patients.     

A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened?

Perforation of the uterus by an intrauterine device (IUD) is a serious complication occurring at or following 1/350 to 1/2,500 insertions. It is more common among women with 'lost' IUDs. If a woman presents with pelvic pain and a history of a 'lost' IUD, X-rays of the abdomen and of the pelvis should be ordered. We report on a 'lost' IUD that had been inserted 12 years previously. It was found in the lower anterior abdominal wall. Most probably uterine perforation had happened during a dilatation and curettage (D & C) attempted for removal of the device. Thereafter the IUD must have migrated to the abdominal wall. This case illustrates that unless it can be recovered by simple traction on the threads, a trained medical professional should be called upon for removal of the IUD.