Are obstetric risk factors and bowel symptoms associated with defaecographic and manometric abnormalities in women awaiting hysterectomy?

Abdominal hysterectomy has been shown to affect anorectal function. These studies are either population-based or have been performed retrospectively. It is not clear from the literature whether those subjects awaiting hysterectomy already have an element of pelvic floor failure and which may be related to obstetric risk factors. A complete anorectal assessment was performed in a group of women awaiting hysterectomy who did not volunteer any bowel symptoms. The patients studied were part of an ongoing study of the functional effects of abdominal hysterectomy. All had their anorectal function assessed before their respective surgery by a questionnaire (functional bowel score), Cleveland continence score, endoanal ultrasound (U/S), anal manometry, defaecatory proctogram and colonic transit. A detailed obstetric history, which included risk factors such as parity, type of delivery, duration of labour and elevated birth weight, were also recorded. Patients with previous bowel disease, bowel surgery and anal sphincter repair were excluded. There were 39 subjects with a median age of 43 years (range 31-65), respectively. Thirty-three rectocoeles and 22 intussusceptions were demonstrated. Two had poor puborectalis function, while five had cough incontinence. Two women had abnormal colonic transit. Thirteen had abnormal anal manometry. Endoanal ultrasound was normal in all patients. None of the obstetric risk factors were associated with rectocoele, intussusception or abnormal anal manometry. Low squeeze pressure was associated significantly with more bowel symptoms (P=0.03). However, rectocoele, intussusception, abnormal colonic transit, abnormal resting anal pressure and maximal tolerated volume were not statistically significantly associated with bowel symptoms. The majority of female subjects who were awaiting hysterectomy had physiological and proctographic abnormalities consistent with pelvic floor failure. Obstetric risk factors were not associated with rectocoele, intussusception, abnormal colonic transit and anal manometry in this cohort of patients. Similarly, the majority of proctographic abnormalities were not associated with bowel symptoms. However, a trend was noted associating bowel symptoms with manometric abnormalities.     

The association of HER-2/neu amplification with breast cancer recurrence

HYPOTHESIS: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene in 25% of breast cancers is associated with a shortened disease-free survival. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a patient population referred to a tertiary care facility for HER-2/neu testing. The mean follow-up was 56 months. SETTING: Large, urban, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: From 1995 to 1999, a consecutive sample of 190 patients with breast cancer had tissue samples tested for overexpression of the cell surface oncoprotein by immunostaining (IM) or amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene by fluorescence in situ hybridization or both. Forty-nine subjects were excluded because they had tissue samples tested at our institution but received their treatment elsewhere. All patients tested for HER-2/neu after diagnosis with breast cancer in 1999 (n = 47) were excluded from analysis because of short follow-up time. One patient was excluded who had in situ ductal carcinoma. The remaining 93 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 40 (43%) had gene amplification. Overall, patients with oncogene amplification had a shorter median disease-free interval (22 months) compared with controls (40 months) (P =.003). Analysis by the Cox regression model showed that the HER-2/neu status remained significantly associated with time to relapse even after adjusting for age and tumor grade (P =.002; adjusted relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.4). No association was found between gene amplification and tumor grade (P =.98), estrogen/progesterone receptor status (P = .29 and P = .43, respectively), or lymph node status (P = .98). Seventy-two patients (77%) eventually had disease recurrence, with 18 (25%) of these recurring locally. CONCLUSIONS: The HER-2/neu oncogene is an independent prognostic indicator of a subset of breast cancers that are at high risk of early recurrence, regardless of tumor grade, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and lymph node status. Patients amplifying the HER-2/neu oncogene have a shorter disease-free survival than patients without the oncogene.     

Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth: fetal growth potential

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that individualized optimal fetal growth norms, accounting for physiologic and pathologic determinants of fetal growth, better identify normal and abnormal outcomes of pregnancy than existing methods. METHODS: In a prospective cohort of 38,033 singleton pregnancies, we identified 9,818 women with a completely normal outcome of pregnancy and characterized the physiologic factors affecting birth weight using multivariable regression. We used those physiologic factors to individually predict optimal growth trajectory and its variation, growth potential, for each fetus in the entire cohort. By comparing actual birth weight with growth potential, population, ultrasound, and customized norms, we calculated for each fetus achieved percentiles, by each norm. We then compared proportions of pregnancies classified as normally grown, between 10th and 90th percentile, or aberrantly grown, outside this interval, by growth potential and traditional norms, in 14,229 complicated pregnancies, 1,518 pregnancies with diabetes or hypertensive disorders, and 1,347 pregnancies with neonatal complications. RESULTS: Nineteen physiologic factors, associated with maternal characteristics and early placental function, were identified. Growth potential norms correctly classified significantly more pregnancies than population, ultrasound, or customized norms in complicated pregnancies (26.4% compared with 18.3%, 18.7%, 22.8%, respectively, all P<.05), pregnancies with diabetes or hypertensive disorders (37.3% compared with 23.0%, 28.0%, 34.0%, respectively, all P<.05) and neonatal complications (33.3% compared with 19.7%, 24.9%, 29.8%, respectively, all P<.05). CONCLUSION: Growth potential norms based on the physiologic determinants of birth weight are a better discriminator of aberrations of fetal growth than traditional norms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.     

Utility of screening for other causes of infertility in women with "known" polycystic ovary syndrome

We investigated the prevalence of abnormal screening results (questionnaire and testing for other causes of oligo-ovulation, male or tubal factor infertility) in a group of 1,313 oligo-ovulatory women (included and excluded subjects) whose condition was screened for inclusion in the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome trial, a multicenter clinical trial that was conducted at 13 sites in the United States. Other than failure to demonstrate laboratory evidence of hyperandrogenemia, the most common reasons for subject exclusion were persistent oligospermia and tubal factor infertility.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of a novel formulation of intravenous diclofenac and ketorolac for postoperative third molar extraction pain

Dyloject is a novel formulation of diclofenac intended for intravenous (IV) administration. This formulation employs the solubilizing agent hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin to permit bolus IV administration. The efficacy and safety of 5 dose levels of IV diclofenac were compared with IV ketorolac and placebo following third molar extraction. This was a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and comparator-controlled, parallel-group study. A total of 353 subjects with moderate to severe pain received placebo; ketorolac 30 mg; or IV diclofenac 3.75, 9.4, 18.75, 37.5, or 75 mg (N = 51 for all groups, except N = 47 for ketorolac). The primary endpoint was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOTPAR6) as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included multiple measures of pain intensity and relief; patient global evaluation; and times to pain relief and rescue medication. Dropouts and adverse effects (AEs) were also monitored. IV diclofenac was superior to placebo as measured by TOTPAR6 (P < .0001 for all doses except 3.75 mg, for which P = .0341). IV diclofenac 3.75 mg was statistically superior to placebo for TOTPAR2 and TOTPAR4. IV diclofenac at both 37.5 and 75 mg was superior to placebo (P < .05) at the earliest (5 minute) assessments of pain intensity and pain relief, but ketorolac was not. The proportion of patients reporting 30% or greater pain relief at 5 minutes was significantly greater after IV diclofenac 37.5 and 75 mg than after ketorolac 30 mg or placebo. Secondary endpoints confirmed the primary findings. Treatment-related AEs were generally mild to moderate and were typical for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The more rapid onset of action of IV diclofenac compared with the reference injectable NSAID ketorolac suggests additional clinical benefit. If confirmed in larger series, these findings may improve the safety and efficacy of postoperative NSAID analgesia.