首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   536篇
  免费   42篇
  国内免费   4篇
耳鼻咽喉   1篇
儿科学   17篇
妇产科学   7篇
基础医学   43篇
口腔科学   24篇
临床医学   73篇
内科学   123篇
皮肤病学   18篇
神经病学   8篇
特种医学   72篇
外科学   66篇
综合类   6篇
预防医学   76篇
眼科学   4篇
药学   11篇
肿瘤学   33篇
  2023年   2篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   4篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   14篇
  2017年   7篇
  2016年   12篇
  2015年   14篇
  2014年   23篇
  2013年   25篇
  2012年   13篇
  2011年   18篇
  2010年   26篇
  2009年   13篇
  2008年   16篇
  2007年   22篇
  2006年   21篇
  2005年   23篇
  2004年   18篇
  2003年   11篇
  2002年   12篇
  2001年   8篇
  2000年   17篇
  1999年   15篇
  1998年   22篇
  1997年   21篇
  1996年   19篇
  1995年   12篇
  1994年   11篇
  1993年   10篇
  1992年   7篇
  1991年   6篇
  1990年   7篇
  1989年   20篇
  1988年   10篇
  1987年   6篇
  1986年   10篇
  1985年   9篇
  1984年   7篇
  1983年   7篇
  1982年   6篇
  1981年   10篇
  1980年   7篇
  1979年   4篇
  1978年   6篇
  1977年   5篇
  1976年   5篇
  1975年   4篇
  1894年   1篇
  1893年   1篇
排序方式: 共有582条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
81.
The Radiation Oncology Center in Sacramento, California, has developed a procedure for establishing an intraoperative radiation therapy facility in a community practice. The logistics pertaining to personnel, equipment, physical measurements, and quality assurance are presented. Particular emphasis is given to the most effective means of acquiring the large quantity of data needed to ensure a program of acceptable quality.  相似文献   
82.
We used 20 different commercial enzymic kits to measure cholesterol in 19 commercial control sera and in a pooled specimen of human serum and compared the relative biases, with the Abell -Kendall procedure as reference. Our purpose was to select those sera in various enzymic kits showing behavior similar to that of human serum and which thus can be used to measure the accuracy of these kits. The overall mean relative biases obtained with each of the 20 kits for the pooled human serum on the one hand and for a given control serum on the other generally correlated significantly. On the basis of the correlation coefficients and regression equations, we could select the control sera best suited for measurement of accuracy. They were all human-serum based, with cholesterol concentrations greater than 5 mmol/L. Animal sera with above-normal lipid values produced by feeding special diets appeared to be less reliable control sera in this respect.  相似文献   
83.
84.
85.
Laboratory results obtained in different laboratories over lengthy periods of time usually are difficult to compare. In cooperative long-term studies where such results must be pooled, thorough standardization of methods is vital. We describe a program in which comparable plasma cholesterol and glucose analyses have been obtained, by simple methods. In the Netherlands and the Soviet Union in close collaboration with the Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga., U.S.A. The two laboratories produced glucose values (direct o-toluidine reaction) within 2% of the target reference values and cholesterol results (direct Liebermann-Burchard reaction) with a consistent 6-8% positive bias over the reference method values. Intralaboratory precision was subject to preset acceptance limits. The use of common control materials, exchange of patient samples, and on-site comparison of all details of laboratory procedures are vital tools in standardization efforts. A laboratory protocol that included quality requirements and rejection criteria was developed and proved to be indispensable. The experience gained should be useful in standardizing inter-laboratory results in similar studies.  相似文献   
86.
87.

Background  

Quality of care from the perspective of users is increasingly used in evaluating health care performance. Going beyond satisfaction studies, quality of care from the users' perspective is conceptualised in two dimensions: the importance users attach to aspects of care and their actual experience with these aspects. It is well established that health care systems differ in performance. The question in this article is whether there are also differences in what people in different health care systems view as important aspects of health care quality. The aim is to describe and explain international differences in the importance that health care users attach to different aspects of health care.  相似文献   
88.
For many years, open exploration of the common bile duct has been the treatment of choice for patients with common bile-duct stones. During recent decades endoscopic sphincterotomy has gained wide acceptance as an effective and less invasive alternative. After sphincterotomy, subsequent (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy is warranted in patients with gallbladder stones. This chapter will discuss whether sphincterotomy should be performed prior to, during or after cholecystectomy, and will also address the question of whether single-stage treatment by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic bile-duct exploration is in fact preferable. The rate of recurrent choledocholithiasis after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy can reach more than 20%. This review focuses on the risk factors--delayed bile-duct clearance and bactobilia--that may lead to recurrent primary bile-duct stone formation. Underlying altered bile composition (relative phospholipid deficiency) should be recognised in a subgroup of patients. Identification of these risk factors may significantly affect treatment policy.  相似文献   
89.
In most countries, endoscopic sphincterotomy is the first-choice treatment for common bile-duct stones. In patients with residual gallbladder stones, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the next step. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy remains to be determined. An alternative approach of combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis consists of laparoscopic cholecystectomy together with laparoscopic stone removal. The advantage of this ‘single-stage’ therapy appears to be limited to patients with stones that can be removed transcystically. This approach is successful in about half of the patients. Laparoscopic common bile-duct exploration is technically more demanding, more time-consuming, and associated with increased postoperative morbidity. If transcystic removal is not possible, a postoperative ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy is a good option. Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy are also feasible, but require specific organisational efforts.Recurrence of choledocholithiasis after ES is reported in a considerable number of patients (6–21%), resulting from de novo primary stone formation or recurrent secondary migration from the gallbladder. Primary choledocholithiasis is associated with bactobilia and delayed bile-duct clearance, indicated by CBD dilation. Endoscopic reintervention is safe and usually easy to perform. Surgery should be reserved for intractable cases. In selected patients, an underlying lithogenic bile composition (low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis) should be identified, and preventive medical treatment with UDCA could be considered.
• in patients with combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis, endoscopic sphincterotomy should be followed by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even in the elderly; however, a ‘wait-and-see’ policy does not lead to higher mortality, and therefore expectant management can be advocated in case of significant contraindications to surgery
• laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic stone removal offers a one-stage treatment of patients with combined cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Laparoscopic transcystic duct clearance is associated with low morbidity and short hospital stay. In contrast, laparoscopic common bile-duct exploration remains a procedure with increased risk of biliary complications and prolonged hospital stay. In case of stones that cannot be removed transcystically, it may be wise to perform an intraoperative or early postoperative ERCP
• performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a ‘rendezvous’ procedure may be beneficial in selected patients (especially in case of earlier failed ERCP)
• laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with increased conversion rates to open procedure compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstones; laparoscopic cholecystectomy planned early after endoscopic sphincterotomy may reduce this risk
• morphological or functional bile-duct defects, indicated by a dilated CBD, may lead to bactobilia and biliary stasis, thus promoting primary stone formation
• in a subgroup of patients with recurrent bile-duct stones, an MDR3 gene mutation must be considered, resulting in low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis. These patients are characterised by early onset of symptoms, recurrence after cholecystectomy, hyperechogenic foci in the liver, and often a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Ursodeoxycholic acid is beneficial in these patients
• the optimal timing or ERCP in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (before, during, or after the operation) still needs to be defined.
• further data are needed to determine potentially increased incidence of conversion and postoperative complications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstones

References

1 L. Sarli, D.R. Iusco and L. Roncoroni, Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience, World J Surg 27 (2003), pp. 180–186. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (19)
2 L. Courvoisier, Casuistisch: statistische beitrage zur pathologie und chirurgie der Gallenwege. Leipzig 387, Vogel (1890) 57–58.
3 J.J. Gonzales, L. Sanz and J.L. Grana, Biliary lithiasis in the elderly patient: morbidity and mortality due to biliary surgery, Hepatogastroenterology 44 (1997), pp. 1565–1568.
4 L.E. Hammarstrom, T. Holmin and H. Stridbeck et al., Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ, Br J Surg 82 (1995), pp. 1516–1521. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (62)
5 J.P. Neoptolemos, D.L. Carr-Locke and D.P. Fossard, Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones, BMJ 294 (1987), pp. 470–474. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (133)
*6 E.M. Targarona, R.M. Perez Ayuso and J.M. Bordas et al., Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients, Lancet 347 (1996), pp. 926–929. Abstract | Article | PDF (563 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (92)
7 M. Classen and L. Demling, Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct, Dtsch Med Wochenschr 99 (1974), pp. 467–469.
8 K. Kawai, Y. Akasaka and K. Murakami et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the amulla of Vater, Gastrointest Endosc 20 (1974), pp. 148–151. Abstract | PDF (2433 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (201)
9 J. Hill, F. Martin and D.E.F. Tweedle, Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones, Br J Surg 78 (1992), pp. 554–557.
10 B.R. Davidson, J.P. Neoptolemos and D.L. Carr-Locke, Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery, Gut 29 (1988), pp. 114–120. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (76)
11 Y.C.A. Keulemans, E.A.J. Rauws and K. Huibregtse et al., Current management of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones, Gastrointest Endosc 46 (1997), pp. 514–519. Abstract | Article | PDF (670 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (24)
12 F. Dubois, G. Berthelot and H. Lavard, Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy, Presse Med 18 (1989), pp. 980–982. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (122)
*13 D. Boerma, E.A. Rauws and Y.C. Keulemans et al., Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial, Lancet 360 (2002), pp. 761–765. Article | PDF (89 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (81)
14 J.Y. Lau, C.K. Leow and T.M. Fung et al., Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients, Gastroenterology 130 (2006), pp. 96–103. Article | PDF (160 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (28)
15 R. Riciardi, S. Islam and J.J. Canete et al., Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 19–22. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
16 J.P. Dorman, M.E. Franklin and J.L. Glass, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy. An effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 12 (1998), pp. 926–928. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
17 A. Waage, C. Stromberg and C.-E. Leijonmarck et al., Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 1181–1185. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
18 A.M. Paganini and E. Lezoche, Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc 12 (1998), pp. 23–29. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
19 I.J. Martin, I.S. Baily and M. Rhodes et al., Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures, Ann Surg 228 (1998), pp. 29–34. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (65)
20 E. Thompson and S.E. Tranter, All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct, Br J Surg 89 (2002), pp. 1608–1612.
21 J.B. Petelin, Lessons learned from >12 years experience, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 1705–1715. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
22 J.P.Y. Ha, C.N. Tang and W.T. Siu et al., Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones, Hepatogastroenterology 51 (2004), pp. 1605–1608. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (15)
*23 A. Cuschieri, E. Lezoche and M. Morino et al., E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi, Surg Endosc 13 (1999), pp. 952–957. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (163)
*24 M. Rhodes, L. Sussman and L. Cohen et al., Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones, Lancet 351 (1998), pp. 159–161. Abstract | Article | PDF (56 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (175)
*25 L.K. Nathanson, N.A. O'Rourke and I.J. Martin et al., Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of elected bile duct calculi. A randomized trial, Ann Surg 242 (2005), pp. 188–192. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)
26 G.D. De Palma, L. Angrisani and M. Lorenzo et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction for management of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 10 (1996), pp. 649–652. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (19)
27 N. Basso, G. Pizzuto and D. Surgo et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999), pp. 532–535. Abstract | Article | PDF (24 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (25)
28 L. Enochsson, B. Lindberg and F. Swahn et al., Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience, Surg Endosc 18 (2004), pp. 367–371. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
29 F. Lella, F. Bagnolo and C. Rebuffat et al., Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called ‘rendezvous’ technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis, Surg Endosc 20 (2006), pp. 419–423. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
30 D.F. Hong, Y. Xin and D.W. Chen, Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, Surg Endosc 20 (2006), pp. 424–427. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (6)
31 M. Neubrand, M. Sackmann and W.F. Caspary et al., Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten zur Behandlung von Gallensteinen, Z Gastroenterol 38 (2000), pp. 449–468. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (23)
*32 E.H. Livingston and R.V. Rege, Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare, J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005), pp. 426–433. Article | PDF (316 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (12)
*33 P.A. Abboud, P.F. Malet and J.A. Berlin et al., Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis, Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996), pp. 450–455.
34 L. Santucci, G. Natalini and L. Sarpi et al., Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study, Am J Gastroenterol 91 (1996), pp. 1326–1330. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (29)
35 J. Bingener-Casey, M.L. Richards and W.E. Strodel et al., Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10 year review, J Gastrointest Surg 6 (2002), pp. 800–805. Abstract | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
36 E.H. Livingston and R.V. Rege, A nationwide study of conversion from laparosocpic to open cholecystectomy, Am J Surg 188 (2004), pp. 205–211. Article | PDF (64 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (53)
37 A.J. McMahon, I.T. Russell and G. Ramsay et al., Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function, Surgery 115 (1994), pp. 533–539. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (129)
38 A. Ros, L. Gustafsson and H. Krook et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized, single-blind study, Ann Surg 234 (2001), pp. 741–749. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (62)
39 H.I. Hendolin, M.E. Paakonen and E.M. Alhava et al., Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response, Eur J Surg 166 (2000), pp. 394–399. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (52)
40 J.S. Barkun, A.N. Barkun and J.S. Sampalis et al., Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group, Lancet 340 (1992), pp. 1116–1119. Abstract | Article | PDF (585 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (205)
41 S. Hasukic, D. Mesic and E. Dizdarevic et al., Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, Surg Endosc 16 (2002), pp. 163–165.
42 U. Berggren, T. Gordh and D. Grama et al., Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses, Br J Surg 81 (1994), pp. 1362–1365. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (152)
43 J. Sand, I. Airo and K.M. Hiltunen et al., Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy, Am Surg 58 (1992), pp. 324–328. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (33)
44 A. Hamy, S. Hennekinne and P. Pessaux et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholcystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis, Surg Endosc 17 (2003), pp. 872–875. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
45 L. Sarli, D. Iusco and G. Sgobba et al., Gallstone pancreatitis. A 10-year experience of combined endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment, Surg Endosc 16 (2002), pp. 975–980. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (12)
46 A. Vries de, S. Donkervoort and A.A.W. Geloven van et al., Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?, Surg Endosc 19 (2005), pp. 996–1001.
47 J.Y. Sung, J.W. Leung and E.A. Shaffer et al., Ascending infection of the biliary tract after surgical sphincterotomy and biliary stenting, J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 (1992), pp. 240–245. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (51)
48 J.C. Pereira-Lima, R. Jakobs and U.H. Winter et al., Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms, Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998), pp. 457–464. Abstract | Article | PDF (89 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (75)
49 S. Ikeda, M. Tanaka and S. Matsumoto et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-up, Endoscopy 20 (1988), pp. 13–17. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (56)
50 D.I. Kim, M.H. Kim and S.K. Lee et al., Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001), pp. 42–48. Article | PDF (82 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (24)
51 J.J. Bergman, S. van der Mey and E.A. Rauws et al., Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age, Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996), pp. 643–649. Abstract | Article | PDF (827 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (112)
52 K.H. Lai, L.F. Lin and G.H. Lo et al., Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?, Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999), pp. 483–487. Abstract | Article | PDF (42 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (35)
53 T. Ando, T. Tsuyuguchi and T. Okugawa et al., Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy, Gut 52 (2003), pp. 116–121. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (22)
54 G. Costamagna, A. Tringali and S.K. Shah et al., Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence, Endoscopy 34 (2002), pp. 273–279. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (45)
55 E. Seifert, Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), Endoscopy 20 (1988) (supplement 1), pp. 232–235. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
56 K.H. Lai, N.J. Peng and G.H. Lo et al., Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy, Gut 41 (1997), pp. 399–403. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (21)
57 W.W. Ng, K.H. Lai and R.S. Liu et al., Biliary motility following endoscopic sphincterotomy for recurrent common bile duct stones, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 56 (1995), pp. 159–165. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (5)
58 J.W. Leung, J.Y. Sung and J.W. Costerton, Bacteriological and electron microscopy examination of brown pigment stones, J Clin Microbiol 27 (1989), pp. 915–921. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
59 M. Sugiyama, Y. Suzuki and N. Abe et al., Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy, Gut 53 (2004), pp. 1856–1859. Full Text via CrossRef
60 S. Sultan and J. Baillie, Recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy 1, Gut 53 (2004), pp. 1725–1727. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (3)
61 K.H. Lai, G.H. Lo and C.K. Lin et al., Do patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis after endoscopic sphincterotomy benefit from regular follow-up?, Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002), pp. 523–526. Abstract | PDF (52 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
62 D.J. Geenen, J.E. Geenen and F.M. Jafri et al., The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones, Endoscopy 30 (1998), pp. 18–20. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
*63 R.H. Hawes, P.B. Cotton and A.G. Vallon, Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy, Gastroenterology 98 (1990), pp. 1008–1012. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (104)
64 F. Prat, N.A. Malak and G. Pelletier et al., Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, Gastroenterology 110 (1996), pp. 894–899. Abstract | PDF (80 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (81)
65 M.D. Apstein and M.C. Carey, Pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones: a parsimonious hypothesis, Eur J Clin Invest 26 (1996), pp. 343–352. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (73)
66 J.J. Smit, A.H. Schinkel and R.P. Oude Elferink et al., Homozygous disruption of the murine mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease, Cell 75 (1993), pp. 451–462. Abstract | Article | PDF (10874 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (779)
67 M. Fracchia, S. Pellegrino and P. Secreto et al., Biliary lipid composition in cholesterol microlithiasis, Gut 48 (2001), pp. 702–706. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
*68 O. Rosmorduc, B. Hermelin and R. Poupon, MDR3 gene defect in adults with symptomatic intrahepatic and gallbladder cholesterol cholelithiasis, Gastroenterology 120 (2001), pp. 1459–1467. Abstract | PDF (2149 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (128)
69 O. Rosmorduc, B. Hermelin and P.Y. Boelle et al., ABCB4 gene mutation-associated cholelithiasis in adults, Gastroenterology 125 (2003), pp. 452–459. Article | PDF (253 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (83)
70 K. Uchiyama, H. Onishi and M. Tani et al., Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis, Ann Surg 238 (2003), pp. 97–102. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
71 D.G. Maxton, D.E. Tweedle and D.F. Martin, Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting, Gut 36 (1995), pp. 446–449. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (42)
72 J.J. Bergman, E.A. Rauws and J.G. Tijssen et al., Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients, Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995), pp. 195–201. Abstract | Article | PDF (1225 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (77)
*73 E. Roda, F. Bazzoli and A.M. Labate et al., Ursodeoxycholic acid vs. chenodeoxycholic acid as cholesterol gallstone-dissolving agents: a comparative randomized study, Hepatology 2 (1982), pp. 804–810. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
  相似文献   
90.
OBJECTIVE: It is assumed that the toxic effects of glucose play a role in the outcome of critically ill patients. We studied the impact of the amount of infused glucose as a determinant of mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study design was used as blood glucose levels in critically ill patients are nowadays tightly controlled. PATIENTS: Long-stay critically ill patients (7-30 days). MEASUREMENTS: The association between the mean amount of glucose infusion and both intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality was determined. We corrected for the mean glucose serum concentration, the mean dosage of insulin and for severity of illness, using the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score. RESULTS: Of the 2,042 admitted patients, 273 met the inclusion criteria. The mean length of stay was 14.4 days [interquartile range (IQR) 9-18]. Hospital mortality was significantly lower for patients with a mean glucose level below 8 mmol/l (30/79; 38%) compared to patients with a level above 8 mmol/l (104/194; 54%, P=0.023). Logistic stepwise multivariate regression analysis for both ICU and hospital mortality as dependent variables showed that APACHE II score and the mean daily amount of infused glucose were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: In long-stay ICU patients without blood glucose level control, the ICU and hospital mortality was independently related to the mean amount of infused glucose. In addition, mortality in patients with a mean glucose level above 8.0 mmol/l was higher. Both these determinants of mortality can exert their effects by insulin-independent uptake of glucose with subsequent toxic intracellular effects.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号