Volume changes associated with protein folding reactions contain valuable information about the folding mechanism and the nature of the transition state. However, meaningful interpretation of such data requires that overall volume changes be deconvoluted into individual contributions from different structural components. Here we focus on one type of structural element, the α-helix, and measure triplet–triplet energy transfer at high pressure to determine volume changes associated with the helix–coil transition. Our results reveal that the volume of a 21-amino-acid alanine-based peptide shrinks upon helix formation. Thus, helices, in contrast with native proteins, become more stable with increasing pressure, explaining the frequently observed helical structures in pressure-unfolded proteins. Both helix folding and unfolding become slower with increasing pressure. The volume changes associated with the addition of a single helical residue to a preexisting helix were obtained by comparing the experimental results with Monte Carlo simulations based on a kinetic linear Ising model. The reaction volume for adding a single residue to a helix is small and negative (−0.23 cm
3 per mol = −0.38 Å
3 per molecule) implying that intrahelical hydrogen bonds have a smaller volume than peptide-water hydrogen bonds. In contrast, the transition state has a larger volume than either the helical or the coil state, with activation volumes of 2.2 cm
3/mol (3.7 Å
3 per molecule) for adding and 2.4 cm
3/mol (4.0 Å
3 per molecule) for removing one residue. Thus, addition or removal of a helical residue proceeds through a transitory high-energy state with a large volume, possibly due to the presence of unsatisfied hydrogen bonds, although steric effects may also contribute.Understanding the effect of pressure on protein stability and dynamics provides insight into fundamental principles and mechanisms of protein folding (
1). For most proteins, increasing pressure shifts the folding equilibrium toward the unfolded state, which, according to Le Chatelier’s principle, shows that the native state has a larger volume than the unfolded state (
2–
4). The origin of the volume increase upon folding has been discussed controversially for a long time. The major obstacle in the interpretation of volume changes is opposing contributions from different effects. Analysis of high-resolution X-ray structures suggested that formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions in the native state lead to a decrease in atomic volumes and thus to a decrease in protein volume upon folding (
5). Further, water around hydrophobic groups has a larger volume than bulk water, which also leads to a decrease in volume upon burial of hydrophobic groups in the native protein (
6). On the other hand, formation of ordered water structures around charged groups (
7) and solvation of the peptide backbone decrease the water volume (
6), which leads to a volume increase upon folding. Recent experimental results suggested that volume changes associated with transfer of groups from solvent to the protein interior upon folding are small and that the formation of void volumes in native proteins is the major origin of the volume increase upon folding (
8).Volume changes associated with the formation of protein folding transition states are only poorly characterized. High-pressure stopped-flow experiments on tendamistat (
9) and cold shock protein (
10), as well as pressure-jump experiments on cold-shock protein (
10) and an ankyrin repeat domain (
11), revealed that volumes of protein folding transition states are close to the volume of the native state and may even exceed the native state volume under some conditions (
9–
11). Similar results were found for the folding and unfolding reactions of ribonuclease A (
12), which are both complex and dominated by kinetic coupling between slow prolyl isomerization and protein folding reactions (
13–
16). All folding and unfolding reactions of RNase A reveal positive activation volumes, indicating that the transition state volumes are larger than those of the native and unfolded state (
12).To understand the origin of volume changes associated with protein folding it is important to dissect contributions of intramolecular interactions, such as secondary structure formation, from contributions of packing deficiencies in the native state. Volume changes associated with the formation of protein α-helices can be obtained by studying the effect of pressure on stability and folding–unfolding dynamics of α-helical peptides. Alanine-based peptides form helical structures with intramolecular hydrogen bonds and solvent-accessible side chains and are thus well-suited to study the effect of pressure on secondary structure formation in the absence of void volumes formed in the protein core of native proteins. The effect of pressure on the stability of alanine-based helical peptides has been addressed both experimentally and in simulations albeit with different conclusions. FTIR experiments revealed an increase in helix stability with increasing pressure, indicating a smaller volume of the helical state compared with the unfolded state (
17). Molecular dynamics simulations, in contrast, suggested that the unfolded state of Ala-based peptides has a slightly smaller volume than the helical state (
18). The simulations further revealed a change in geometry and length of hydrogen bonds with increasing pressure, which should have an effect on FTIR bands and NMR chemical shifts. Changes in hydrogen bond length in protein secondary structures with increasing pressure were experimentally confirmed in high-pressure NMR studies on ubiquitin (
19).To determine the effect of pressure on stability and dynamics of α-helices in the absence of tertiary structure and without contributions from changes in spectroscopic properties, we measured triplet–triplet energy transfer (TTET) at various pressures in an Ala-based 21-amino-acid helical peptide. TTET coupled to a folding–unfolding equilibrium yields information on local conformational stability and dynamics on the nanoseconds to microseconds time scale (
20–
22). Intrachain TTET in polypeptide chains occurs through loop formation and is based on van der Waals contact between a triplet donor and a triplet acceptor group (
23,
24). If the triplet labels are introduced in proteins and peptides at sites that are not in contact in the folded structure, unfolding in the region between the labels has to occur before TTET. The resulting TTET kinetics yield information on the local folding–unfolding dynamics and on the local stability in the region between the TTET labels (
20–
22). In our previous work we introduced the triplet donor xanthone (Xan) and the triplet acceptor naphthylalanine (Nal) into α-helical peptides with i,i+6 spacing, which places them at opposite sides of the helix and prevents TTET in the helical state (). Thus, at least partial unfolding of the helix in the region between the labels is required before TTET can occur (
20,
22). The overall reaction can be described by the three-state model shown in . Because the folding–unfolding dynamics and loop formation occur on a similar time scale (
20,
22) and both the folded and the unfolded state are populated to significant amounts in equilibrium, the two observable rate constants
λ1 and
λ2 for TTET and their corresponding amplitudes
A1 and
A2 yield the rate constants for local helix formation and unfolding between the labels
kf and
ku, as well as the rate constant for loop formation (
kc) (
SI Text). In addition, the local equilibrium constant (
Keq) for helix stability in the region between the labels can be obtained from
Keq =
kf/
ku. TTET experiments do not require perturbation of the helix–coil equilibrium and thus yield information on equilibrium fluctuations of the helix. We have previously investigated local stability and dynamics in various regions of the 21-amino-acid Ala-based helical peptide, which showed a position-independent helix formation rate constant (
kf) and a position-dependent helix unfolding rate constant (
ku) with faster unfolding at the termini compared with the center (
20). This results in higher local helix stability in the center compared with the ends, which is expected from helix–coil theory based on a linear Ising model and in agreement with previous results from hydrogen–deuterium exchange experiments (
25).
Open in a separate windowSchematic representation of TTET coupled to a helix–coil equilibrium. The equilibrium between a folded (F) and an unfolded or partially unfolded (U) conformation between the labels is monitored by fast and irreversible TTET through loop formation in the ensemble of unfolded conformations (U*). The triplet labels xanthonic acid (Xan, blue) and 1-naphthylalanine (Nal, red) are placed on opposite sides in the central region of the helix with i,i+6 spacing.Because TTET coupled to the helix–coil transition gives information on local equilibrium constants, independent of changes in spectroscopic properties of the helix, this method is perfectly suited to study the effect of pressure on local helix stability. In addition, pressure-dependent TTET experiments yield the activation volumes for helix folding and unfolding. Here, we investigate the effect of pressures on stability and dynamics of the α-helix–coil transition in the center of the 21-amino-acid Ala-based peptide using a high-pressure laserflash setup. The results reveal that the helical structure becomes stabilized with increasing pressure indicating a volume decrease upon helix formation. The dynamics of helix formation and unfolding both slow down with increasing pressure, which shows that the transition state for growth and shrinking of the helical structure has a larger volume than both helical and unfolded state and points at a non-hydrogen-bonded transition state structure.
相似文献