Maxillary Anterior Teeth With Extensive Root Resorption Treated With Low-level Light-activated Engineered Chitosan Nanoparticles

IntroductionPhotoactivated chitosan-based nanoparticles can eliminate bacterial biofilm, inactivate endotoxins, improve resistance to biological degradation (resorption), and promote bone regeneration. This case is the first documentation to highlight the successful healing of teeth with extensive inflammatory root resorption (IRR) with periapical lesions using a combined surgical and nonsurgical root canal therapy using rose bengal functionalized chitosan nanoparticles (CSRBnp).MethodsA 17-year-old boy with extensive IRR of maxillary right canine (teeth #6), maxillary right lateral incisor (#7), maxillary right central incisor (#8), and maxillary left central incisor (#9) was treated with photoactivated CSRBnp, both intracanal as well as topically on resorptive defects and periapical lesions. The larger external resorptive defects on the root surfaces were restored with Biodentine, whereas the through-and-through periapical lesions were packed with sticky bone for Guided Bone Regeneration.ResultsAt 26 months of follow-up, the clinical, 2-dimensional (intraoral periapical radiographs) and 3-dimensional (cone-beam computed tomography) images showed absence of clinical symptoms, teeth mobility, arrested IRR, and significant osseous healing of the periradicular region. Postoperatively, the patient retraumatized thrice in relation to #7 resulting in horizontal root fracture, which showed type I pattern of root fracture healing in the follow-up.ConclusionsPhotoactivated chitosan-based nanoparticles can be a viable therapeutic option to hinder root resorption while enhancing healing outcomes in cases of severe IRR.     

Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement

Background:

The use of allografts and autografts in the management of acetabular defects have been reported with varying results. Trabecular metal is an expensive option in the management of these defects. This study aims to assess the fate and efficacy of bone grafting for acetabular bone defects in total hip arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 30 hips in 28 patients with acetabular deficiencies were treated with bone grafting and total hip replacement (THR). Seventeen hips had American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) type 2 (Paprosky type 2c) deficiency and 13 had AAOS type 3 (Paprosky type 3a) defects of the acetabulum. Allografts were used in 15 patients and autografts were used in the remaining 13. Cemented total hip arthroplasty was done in 18 hips and uncemented THR in 12. Seven patients underwent the procedure for, acetabular erosion and symptoms following hemiarthroplasty (4 out of 7), or, acetabular revision for failure (3 out of 7) following total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular deficiencies in other patients were due to posttraumatic causes, advanced primary hip arthritis and second stage treatment of postinfective arthritis. A mesh was used in 6 hips and screws were used in 13 hips for graft fixation.

Results:

Patients were followed up clinicoradiologically for a period of 10 months to 4 years (mean 23.4 months). One patient required staged revision due to infection. Two patients had early asymptomatic cup migration. One patient had graft lysis and change in cup inclination with persistent pain. He was not keen on further intervention at last followup. Other patients were pain free at the time of followup with radiographs showing maintenance of graft and implant position.

Conclusion:

Bone grafting is a suitable option in the management of acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty, especially in resource challenged countries.     

Treatment of neglected femoral neck fracture

Intra-capsular femoral neck fractures are seen commonly in elderly people following a low energy trauma. Femoral neck fracture has a devastating effect on the blood supply of the femoral head, which is directly proportional to the severity of trauma and displacement of the fracture. Various authors have described a wide array of options for treatment of neglected/nonunion (NU) femoral neck fracture. There is lack of consensus in general, regarding the best option. This Instructional course article is an analysis of available treatment options used for neglected femoral neck fracture in the literature and attempt to suggest treatment guides for neglected femoral neck fracture. We conducted the “Pubmed” search with the keywords “NU femoral neck fracture and/or neglected femoral neck fracture, muscle-pedicle bone graft in femoral neck fracture, fibular graft in femoral neck fracture and valgus osteotomy in femoral neck fracture.” A total of 203 print articles were obtained as the search result. Thirty three articles were included in the analysis and were categorized into four subgroups based on treatment options. (a) treated by muscle-pedicle bone grafting (MPBG), (b) closed/open reduction internal fixation and fibular grafting (c) open reduction and internal fixation with valgus osteotomy, (d) miscellaneous procedures. The data was pooled from all groups for mean neglect, the type of study (prospective or retrospective), classification used, procedure performed, mean followup available, outcome, complications, and reoperation if any. The outcome of neglected femoral neck fracture depends on the duration of neglect, as the changes occurring in the fracture area and fracture fragments decides the need and type of biological stimulus required for fracture union. In stage I and stage II (Sandhu''s staging) neglected femoral neck fracture osteosynthesis with open reduction and bone grafting with MPBG or Valgus Osteotomy achieves fracture union in almost 90% cases. However, in stage III with or without AVN, the results of osteosynthesis are poor and the choice of treatment is replacement arthroplasty (hemi or total).     

A ph mesh refinement method for optimal control

A mesh refinement method is described for solving a continuous‐time optimal control problem using collocation at Legendre–Gauss–Radau points. The method allows for changes in both the number of mesh intervals and the degree of the approximating polynomial within a mesh interval. First, a relative error estimate is derived based on the difference between the Lagrange polynomial approximation of the state and a Legendre–Gauss–Radau quadrature integration of the dynamics within a mesh interval. The derived relative error estimate is then used to decide if the degree of the approximating polynomial within a mesh should be increased or if the mesh interval should be divided into subintervals. The degree of the approximating polynomial within a mesh interval is increased if the polynomial degree estimated by the method remains below a maximum allowable degree. Otherwise, the mesh interval is divided into subintervals. The process of refining the mesh is repeated until a specified relative error tolerance is met. Three examples highlight various features of the method and show that the approach is more computationally efficient and produces significantly smaller mesh sizes for a given accuracy tolerance when compared with fixed‐order methods. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.