93例嗜铬细胞瘤临床分析

回顾分析瑞金医院1998年至2003年所有病理诊断为嗜铬细胞瘤的93例患者的临床表现、生化检查、影像学诊断。临床上有三联症状(头痛、心悸、多汗)之一的占77.4%;表现为极不稳定性高血压或难治性高血压的占78.5%,18.3%无临床表现,认为是无症状嗜铬细胞瘤。生化诊断阳性率59.6%;B超检查阳性率为97.8%;CT或MRI检查阳性率为97.1%;131碘标记间碘苄胍放射性核素扫描阳性率83.3%。本研究显示尚无一项检查能单独明确诊断嗜铬细胞瘤,将生化、影像学检查结合是术前诊断所必需,而手术后病理学检查是确诊嗜铬细胞瘤的依据。     

胰岛素样生长因子Ⅱ表达异常与胸膜孤立性纤维瘤致低血糖

本研究采用免疫放射分析(IRMA)、RT-PCR和Northern印迹技术,在1例少见的非胰岛细胞肿瘤性低血糖(NICTH)患者肿瘤组织检测到高表达的胰岛素样生长因子Ⅱ(IGF-Ⅱ)蛋白,其mRNA表达水平也异常增高,并呈现出基因转录本多样性,这提示IGF-Ⅱ的自分泌产物在肿瘤源性低血糖的病理过程中起着重要作用。     

脂肪细胞因子的临床和基础研究

脂肪组织具有旺盛的内分泌功能。其分泌的细胞因子可分为脂肪组织特异表达的脂肪因子如瘦素、脂联素和非特异表达的脂肪因子如多种炎症因子。近年新的脂肪因子不断被发现如内脏脂肪素等，同时已肯定脂肪因子参与体内多种代谢活动，尤其是与胰岛素抵抗的发生等密切相关。此外，脂肪因子的新的功能也不断被挖掘，其在体内的作用越来越重要。本文将结合本课题组对脂肪因子的临床和基础研究，介绍脂肪内分泌功能和脂肪因子作用等的进展。     

甲状腺相关眼病活动性评判及病情的影响因素

甲状腺相关眼病 (TAO)的病程历经炎症活动期和非活动期 2个阶段 ,不同阶段对免疫抑制治疗或放疗的疗效不同 ,因此评判其活动性成为选择治疗方案和估计预后的关键。临床上可以通过临床活动性评分、眼眶A超、磁共振成像、核素扫描等检查以及测定血中免疫调节分子、自身免疫抗体来评价眼病的活动性。眼病的病情与甲状腺功能状态及甲状腺功能亢进治疗方法、吸烟等多种因素密切相关。本文就TAO活动性评判方法及影响因素进行综述。     

Graves病患者甲状腺激素水平正常后sTSH长期抑制机制的探讨

目的 探讨临床上部分Graves病(GD)患者经抗甲状腺药物(ATD)治疗后甲状腺激素水平达到正常,但促甲状腺素(TSH)仍长期处于被抑制状态的机制.方法 入选初发122例GD甲亢患者,予以初始等效剂量的ATD治疗,每月随访时根据甲状腺功能测定的结果酌情减量,并适时添加左旋甲状腺素(L-T4).当甲状腺激素(FT3、FT4)水平持续正常3个月即达随访标准,复查FT3、FT4、sTSH、TSH受体抗体(TRAb),并根据TRAb是否阳性分组比较.结果 122例GD甲亢患者经(7.1±1.1)个月的ATD治疗后,甲状腺激素水平均已经达到正常3个月.随访时,58例TRAb转为阴性,64例TRAb持续阳性.两组甲状腺激素水平无差异, TRAb阳性组的sTSH水平明显低于阴性组[0.044 mIU/L(0.001～4.163 mIU/L) vs 1.749 mIU/L(0.079～4.646 mIU/L),P＜0.01];血清sTSH水平与TRAb呈明显负相关(r=-0.539,P＜0.01),与FT3、FT4、年龄、病程、治疗时间、L-T4剂量、L-T4添加时间等均无相关性.结论 药物治疗过程中,甲状腺激素水平正常的GD患者,其TSH水平长期受抑制的原因与高水平TRAb相关,可能由于TRAb直接与垂体内TSH受体结合,通过超短环反馈抑制TSH的分泌所致.     

一种新的遗传性原发性醛固酮增多症:家族性醛固酮增多症Ⅲ型

原发性醛固酮增多症(原醛)是最常见的继发性高血压病因,占高血压患者的5%～10%.与具有相似危险因素的原发性高血压患者相比,原醛患者更易发生中风、心肌梗死、房颤,且心血管损害与代谢并发症的发生明显增加,因而此类高血压的诊断至关重要.     

线粒体糖尿病一例家系分析

线粒体糖尿病在临床上十分少见,截止2005年国内报道的线粒体基因nt3243A→G突变糖尿病家系33个,患者共104例[1].以下对我们新发现的1例线粒体糖尿病家系分析如下.     

良性前列腺增生与肥胖相关性研究

目的 探讨良性前列腺增生(BPH)与肥胖或中心性肥胖的关系.方法 选择老年男性患者109例,分为BPH组(59例)和非BPH组(50例),检测血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及性激素、血脂等相关生化指标;测量身高、体质量、腰围等物理指标;经腹超声测量前列腺体积,并随访至少3次.结果 肥胖组BPH患病率(73.33%)及超体质量组BPH患病率(64.28%)均较正常组(26.67%)增高(x2分别为13.991,6.836,均P＜0.002),中心性肥胖组BPH患病率(71.19%)较非中心性肥胖组(36.00%)明显增高(x2=12.156,P＜0.001);BPH组腰围身高指数、腰围、体质量、体质指数、臀围[0.56±0.05、(93.6±8.8)cm、(72.6±9.7)kg、(25.7±3.4)kg/m2和(100.2±6.6)cm]明显高于非前列腺增生组[0.52±0.06、(87.0±10.1)cm、(64.5±9.3)kg、(23.1±2.9)kg/m2和(95.6±8.1)cm](t分别=-3.30,-3.65,-4.38,-4.17,-3.18,均P＜0.01);肥胖组前列腺总体积高于正常组[(40.8±23.5)ml与(20.1±6.1)ml,t=-2.82,P＜0.01),中心性肥胖组明显高于非中心性肥胖组[(42.8±25.6)ml与(26.9±11.2)ml],(t=-3.93,P＜0.001);中心性肥胖组雌二醇/总睾酮(E2/TT)比值、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)(9.06±4.36、2.81±2.80)高于非中心性肥胖组(7.38±3.11、1.55±0.76)(t分别=-2.02,-4.24,均P＜0.05),血清TT、性激素结合蛋白(SHBG)则低于非中心性肥胖组[(4.54±1.54)nmol/L对(5.20±1.54)nmol/L,(45.8±17.24)nmol/L对(59.6±26.09)nmol/L,均t分别=2.16,2.79,P＜0.05];Logistic逐步回归分析表明,腰围是影响前列腺体积的主要因素(x2=19.52,P=0.000);前列腺总体积的年增长率在肥胖组同样高于正常组[(7.14±8.09)ml与(1.49±5.14)ml,t=-2.19,P＜0.05],在中心性肥胖组明显高于非中心性肥胖组[(7.96±13.81)ml与(1.35±5.36)m1,t=-3.28,P＜0.01];中心性肥胖组的前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)低于非中心性肥胖组(0.048±0.036对0.090±0.093,t=2.02,P＜0.05);肥胖组的PSAD低于正常组(0.052±0.039与0.091±0.080,t=3.13,P＜0.01).结论 BPH的发生与肥胖,尤其是中心性肥胖密切相关,其机制可能与肥胖患者体内性激素失衡、生长激素-胰岛素样生长因子轴的紊乱有关.

Abstract：

Objective To explore the relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)and obesity. Methods The 109 elder men were divided into two groups: BPH group (n=59) and non-BPH group (n= 50). The blood samples were collected for the detections of prostate specific antigen (PSA), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin,androgen, estrogen, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA).The anthropometric indexes including height, body weigh, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were measured and calculated. The total prostate volume (TPV) were measured by transabdominal ultrasonography three times at least. Results The morbidity rate of BPH was significantly higher in obesity group and over weight group than in health control group (73.33% and 64.28% vs. 26. 67%, x2 = 13. 991 and 6. 836, both P＜0. 002). So was in central obesity group versus in health control group (71.19% vs.36.00%, x2 =12. 156, P＜0. 001). The waist-height index, waist circumference, body weight, BMI and hip circumference were significantly higher in BPH group than in non-BPH group [(0. 56±0. 05)vs. (0.52±0.06), (93. 6±8.8) cm vs. (87.0± 10. 1) cm; (72.6±9.7) kg vs. (64.5±9.3) kg;(25.7±3.4) kg/m2 vs. (23.1±2.9) kg/m2; (100.2±6.6) cm vs. (95.6±8. 1) cm; t=-3.3, -3. 65, -4.38, -4. 17 and -3.18, respectively, all P＜0.01]. The TPV was higher in obesity groupthan in normal group [ (40.8± 23.5 ) ml vs. (20. 1 ± 6.1 ) ml, t = - 2.82, P＜ 0. 002] and obviously higher in central obesity group than in non-central obesity group [(42.8±25.6)ml vs. (26. 9±11.2)ml, t= -3. 93, P＜0. 001]. The ratio of E2/TT and HOMA-IR were higher in central obesity group [(9. 06±4.36) and (2.81 ±2. 80)] than in non-central obesity group [(7. 38±3. 11) and (1. 55±0.76), t= -2.02 and -4.24, both P＜0. 05]. Inversely, the TT and SHBG were lower in central obesity group than in non-central obesity group [(4.54 ± 1.54) nmol/L vs. (5.20 ± 1.54) nmol/L,(45.8± 17.24) nmol/L vs. (59.6 ± 26.09) nmol/L, t = 2.16 and 2.79, both P＜ 0. 05]. Logistic regression analysis showed that waist circumference was a major factor affecting TPV (x2= 19.52, P=0. 000). The annual growth rate of TPV was significantly higher in obesity group and central obesity group than in health control group [(7. 14±8. 09)ml vs. (1. 49±5.14)ml, (7. 96±13.81)mlvs. (1. 35±5.36)ml, t=-2.19 and -3.28, both P＜0. 05]; The PSAD was significantly lower in central obesity group than in health control group [(0. 048±0. 036) vs. (0. 090±0. 093), t=2.02, P＜0. 05], and lower in obesity group than in health control group [(0. 052 ±0. 039) vs. (0. 091 ±0. 080), t= 3. 13, P＜0. 01]. Conclusions The occurrence of BPH is closely related to obesity,especially central obesity. Its mechanism may be related to sex hormone imbalance and the GH/IGF-1 axis disorders in obese patients.     

肾上腺静脉插管取血在原发性醛固酮增多症分型诊断中的意义

目的　探讨肾上腺静脉插管检查在原发性醛固酮增多症 (原醛 )分型诊断中的应用价值。方法　临床 14例明确为原醛患者 ( 11例腺瘤及 3例增生 )经肾上腺静脉插管检查 ,取双侧肾上腺静脉以及肾静脉水平下的下腔静脉采血 ,测各点醛固酮和皮质醇水平 ,并将结果与影像学检查及术后病理结果进行比较。结果　腺瘤患者插管结果与影像学检查及术后病理结果无统计学差异 ,符合率为 81 82 % ( 9/ 11) ,3例增生患者插管结果与影像学检查结果均相符。结论　肾上腺静脉插管检查在原醛的分型诊断中有较好的准确性 ,是影像学检查有疑问时可选择的良好方法。