Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and colonic infarction: a risk factor appraisal

OBJECTIVE: Colonic infarction is a recognized complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. The clinical difficulty in establishing the diagnosis combined with the patient's poor physiological status is usually associated with a fatal outcome. We assessed our experience with this problem to identify a possible risk factor profile for these patients. METHOD: Patients records were identified from the operative logs, intensive care unit, Hospital Inpatient Enquiry system and vascular unit databases over a 6-year period. RESULTS: A total of 405 patients underwent AAA repair during this period; 140 as emergency ruptures. Nine patients were identified from the databases with known colonic infarction (2.2%). One was a woman. The mean age was 70 years. Seven patients had emergency ruptures (5%). Twenty independent risk factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Significant risk factors identified by using a multivariate analysis included the nature of the presenting patient, preoperative hypotension, prolonged cross-clamp time, intra-operative ischaemia and postoperative acidosis. Confirmatory diagnosis was made by colonoscopy in eight patients. One patient survived following the salvage surgery. The mean duration of survival was 10.5 days. The overall mortality was 89% of patients. CONCLUSION: In our unit infrarenal AAA repair has a 2.2% rate of colonic infarction. A definitive diagnosis is best made by colonoscopy. A risk factor profile for the development of colonic infarction may be constructed on the basis of specific clinical parameters. Earlier intervention on the basis of this profile may ultimately reduce the current excessive mortality.     

The effect of perioperative beta-blockade on the pulmonary function of patients undergoing major arterial surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Concern about the potential detrimental side-effects of beta-blockade on pulmonary function often dissuades against their perioperative use in patients undergoing major arterial surgery (especially in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)). In this study we aimed to establish prospectively the clinical relevance of these concerns. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and individual informed consent, the pulmonary function of twenty patients (mean age 68.7 years (range 43-82), 11 males) scheduled to undergo non-emergency major vascular surgery was studied by recording symptoms and spirometry before and after institution of effective beta-blockade. Fifteen patients (75%) had significant smoking histories (mean pack years/patient=50), while 12 (60%) had COPD. RESULTS: All patients tolerated effective beta-blockade satisfactorily without developing either subjective deterioration in symptoms or significant change on spirometry. The mean change in FEV1 following adequate beta-blockade was 0.05+/-0.24 liters (95% CI -0.06 to +1.61), p=0.35, giving a mean percentage change of 3.18%+/-11.66 (95% CI -2.26 to 8.62). CONCLUSIONS: Previously held concerns about worsening pulmonary function through the short-term use of beta-blockers should not dissuade their perioperative usage in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Furthermore, the accuracy of pulmonary function tests in preoperative assessment and risk stratification also appears unaffected by this therapy.