Mandibular displacement in Angle Class II, Division 2 malocclusion

The effect of the treatment of Angle Class II, Division 2 malocclusion was studied in 22 children by x-ray cephalometry and by recording the relation between the retruded and the intercuspal mandibular positions. The treatment was performed in three phases. In the first phase the upper incisors were proclined, and the deep bite was corrected with an upper removable plate. In the second phase the distal occlusion was corrected with an activator. The result was retained in the third phase with a second activator designed for retention. The relation between the retruded (RCP) and the intercuspal (ICP) mandibular positions was recorded with wax bites and dental casts mounted in a modified gnathothesiometer. The anteroposterior distance between RCP and ICP was large before the start of the treatment. The distance was unchanged after proclination of the upper incisors and correction of the deep bite but decreased after correction of the distal occlusion and increased again somewhat during the retention phase. The proclination of the upper incisors and the correction of the deep bite (phase one of the treatment) did not result in mandibular anterior positioning. This fact and the results of the recordings of the relation between RCP and ICP were interpreted as evidence that the mandible is not posteriorly displaced in Class II, Division 2 malocclusion.     

Challenges in geriatric oral health research methodology concerning caregivers of cognitively impaired elderly adults

Little is known about oral health care behaviors of community-dwelling, cognitively impaired elderly (CIE) persons. Few studies have been conducted regarding the actual provision of oral care for CIE persons or the attitudes and concerns about oral health among their caregivers. The CIE person's ability to perform self-care decreases over time, and the role of the caregiver in daily oral care becomes increasingly important. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the attitudes toward oral health and identify related concerns among caregivers who care for community-dwelling CIE persons. Caregivers were surveyed by means of a self-administered, mailed questionnaire. To maintain confidentiality, an intermediary was used for recruitment and data collection. Overall, 148 caregivers were invited by an intermediary to participate in the survey; only 21 (14%) consented to participate and returned the questionnaire. This paper discusses some of the numerous methodological challenges identified when an attempt was made to survey caregivers' attitudes toward and barriers to providing oral care for a dependent CIE.     

Urban/Rural Differences in Prosthetic Dental Service Rates

There have been few reports of relative rates of provision of dental health services in rural and urban settings, a comparative measure of access to care in these populations. One part of a statewide survey of active North Carolina general dentists (n=959, response rate=47%) was designed to quantify provision of prosthetic services. To determine contrasting rural and urban rates, responses were analyzed according to dentists'self-report of practice city size using analysis of covariance with percent of insured patients in the practice as the covariate. Mean per-patient-visit rates for crowns, fixed partial dentures, removable partial dentures, and extractions, as well as the distributions of treatment following tooth extraction, differed by city size, with practitioners in the smallest cities reporting treatment distributions reflecting more frequent loss of teeth and less frequent replacement. These differences in patterns of prosthetic care echo the limited existing information describing oral health status, provider supply, and receipt of care, all of which suggest that differential levels of access to care exist and lead to differences in oral health outcomes.     

lnter-rater reliability of an oral assessment guide for elderly patients residing in a rehabilitation ward

The aim of this study was to test the inter-rater reliability of a revised oral assessment guide (ROAG) for patients residing in a geriatric rehabilitation ward. A consecutive sample of 140 patients was recruited for the study. Oral assessments were performed for 133 newly admitted patients by one registered nurse (RN) during a period of six months. A dental hygienist (DH) carried out 103 oral assessments during the same half-year. For 66 patients, the RN and the DH performed independent assessments. There was an agreement between the RN and the DH in the majority of the independent assessments, except for tongue and teeth/dentures. The percentage agreement exceeded 80 percent. Inter-rater agreement measured by Cohen's Kappa coefficient ranged from moderate to very good and percentage agreement had a range of 58 to 91 percent. The agreement was highest in assessment of voice and swallowing (91%). Assessments of teeth and dentures seemed to be most difficult for the RN to evaluate. ROAG was found to be a clinically useful assessment tool. Additional education and training is needed to improve the reliability of the oral assessments and should include continuous support from a dental hygienist as well as a pictorial manual on how to use the ROAG.