Eligible Veterans'' Choice Between VA-covered and Non-VA-covered Dental Care

Veterans who were eligible for dental care in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities at no monetary cost responded to a mailed questionnaire. Seventy-one percent were aware that they were actually eligible for VA dental care. However, only 48 percent reported the VA as their only or primary source of dental care. Eligibility status, perceived quality of VA dental care, use of VA medical care, perception that one's income meets expenses, and perceived need for dental care were significant correlates of using the VA as one's current source of dental care. Level of formal education, perception that one's income meets expenses, transportation pattern, geographic distance from a VA facility, and eligibility status were significant correlates of using the VA as one's current medical care source. Research on VA utilization offers the opportunity to study issues of access to, and use of, a large public health care system whose patients largely receive care at no monetary cost. Veterans' use of VA dental and medical care is apparently influenced by a wide variety of factors, ranging from barriers to access to non-VA systems, to characteristics of the VA delivery system itself, to need for treatment.     

Prevention of Secondary Insults in Neurointensive Care of Traumatic Brain Injury

Background: Secondary insults/complications have a major impact on the prognosis after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim was to study the occurrence and prognostic value of secondary insults occurring in TBI patients, during standardized neurointensive care (NIC) dedicated to avoiding secondary insults. Material and Methods: 154 patients, 17-79 years, with acute head trauma and pathologic CT, treated during a 2-year period at the NIC unit were studied. The occurrence of defined secondary insults (standard and severe) was recorded during the 1st week of NIC from bedside surveillance charts containing one value per hour and parameter (intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, systolic blood pressure, PaO₂, temperature, and blood glucose). The data set was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with favorable outcome as the response variable. Both admission variables (Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score [GCS M], CT class, Injury Severity Score [ISS], age, and gender) and secondary insult variables were included as explanatory variables. Results: In total, 1,570 insults were identified (320 severe). In the univariate analysis, the sum of all insults, blood glucose, GCS M, CT class, and ISS showed significant effects on outcome (p < 0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, GCS M was the only significant explanatory variable. Conclusions: The occurrence of secondary insults in the NIC unit was not negligible, despite the fact that major efforts were made to avoid them. The sum score of all insult categories and high blood glucose had a statistically significant effect on favorable outcome in the univariate analysis, but secondary insults did not add any prognostic information to the neurologic grade in the multivariate analysis. This finding indicates that the insults that occurred were related to the degree of primary injury/neurologic grade.     

Modified orthodontic treatment goals in a patient with multiple complicating factors

This paper reviews orthodontic care in patients who are in non-traditional categories. Specific orthodontic management of a patient who had severe hemophilia, seropositivity for anti-HIV Ab, and Hepatitis B surface antigen is reviewed. The Importance of defining acceptable treatment goals in these patients is of paramount Importance.