Analysis of LMNB1 Duplications in Autosomal Dominant Leukodystrophy Provides Insights into Duplication Mechanisms and Allele‐Specific Expression

Autosomal dominant leukodystrophy (ADLD) is an adult onset demyelinating disorder that is caused by duplications of the lamin B1 (LMNB1) gene. However, as only a few cases have been analyzed in detail, the mechanisms underlying LMNB1 duplications are unclear. We report the detailed molecular analysis of the largest collection of ADLD families studied, to date. We have identified the minimal duplicated region necessary for the disease, defined all the duplication junctions at the nucleotide level and identified the first inverted LMNB1 duplication. We have demonstrated that the duplications are not recurrent; patients with identical duplications share the same haplotype, likely inherited from a common founder and that the duplications originated from intrachromosomal events. The duplication junction sequences indicated that nonhomologous end joining or replication‐based mechanisms such fork stalling and template switching or microhomology‐mediated break induced repair are likely to be involved. LMNB1 expression was increased in patients’ fibroblasts both at mRNA and protein levels and the three LMNB1 alleles in ADLD patients show equal expression, suggesting that regulatory regions are maintained within the rearranged segment. These results have allowed us to elucidate duplication mechanisms and provide insights into allele‐specific LMNB1 expression levels.     

Timing-Invariant CT Angiography Derived from CT Perfusion Imaging in Acute Stroke: A Diagnostic Performance Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Timing-invariant (or delay-insensitive) CT angiography derived from CT perfusion data may obviate a separate cranial CTA in acute stroke, thus enhancing patient safety by reducing total examination time, radiation dose, and volume of contrast material. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of timing-invariant CTA for detecting intracranial artery occlusion in acute ischemic stroke, to examine whether standard CTA can be omitted.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with suspected ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled and underwent CTA and CTP imaging at admission. Timing-invariant CTA was derived from the CTP data. Five neuroradiologic observers assessed all images for the presence and location of intracranial artery occlusion in a blinded and randomized manner. Sensitivity and specificity of timing-invariant CTA and standard CTA were calculated by using an independent expert panel as the reference standard. Interrater agreement was determined by using κ statistics.RESULTS:We included 108 patients with 47 vessel occlusions. Overall, standard CTA and timing-invariant CTA provided similar high diagnostic accuracy for occlusion detection with a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 90%–100%) and a specificity of 100% (99%–100%) for standard CTA and a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 100%–100%) for timing-invariant CTA. For proximal large-vessel occlusions, defined as occlusions of the ICA, basilar artery, and M1, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 100%–100%) for both techniques. Interrater agreement was good for both techniques (mean κ value, 0.75 and 0.76).CONCLUSIONS:Timing-invariant CTA derived from CTP data provides diagnostic accuracy similar to that of standard CTA for the detection of artery occlusions in acute stroke.

Stroke imaging research currently focuses on prediction of patient outcome and identifying patients who are suitable for neurointerventional treatment.^1,2 For these purposes, advanced stroke imaging protocols typically add CT perfusion imaging or diffusion-weighted MR imaging to the traditional work-up, consisting of noncontrast CT and CT angiography.^2,3 Noncontrast CT is used to differentiate hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke and to assess early signs of ischemia. CTA is used to localize arterial occlusions and to identify proximal large-vessel occlusions that may be suitable for endovascular treatment. CT perfusion imaging and DWI are used to assess the extent and severity of hypoperfusion and particularly increase the sensitivity of imaging in the early stages of ischemic stroke.⁴ The practical advantages of CT perfusion imaging are that it is widely available and does not delay treatment decisions because it is fast and most patients already undergo CT scanning.³Currently, CTA can be derived from CT perfusion data. Such an approach allows the enhancement of patient safety by reducing the total scanning time, radiation dose, and amount of contrast material needed.⁵ In CT perfusion imaging, multiple scans after intravenous injection of contrast material are obtained with time, generating a 4D dataset, which is used to derive cerebral perfusion maps such as the cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and arrival times. When imaging is performed on a CT scanner with large spatial coverage, however, this 4D data can also be used to provide CT angiographic information, referred to as 4D-CTA or dynamic CTA. Previous studies have assessed whether 4D-CTA can be used for detection of vascular occlusion in a stroke setting but found that image quality was moderate and diagnostic performance for stroke assessment was limited because large-vessel occlusions may be missed.^5–8 Recently, a different approach to obtain CTA from CT perfusion source data was presented that combines the whole 4D-CTA dataset into 1 high-quality 3D-CTA dataset by displaying maximum contrast enhancement with time.⁵ This technique is referred to as “timing-invariant CTA” because it is insensitive to delayed contrast arrival and was shown to provide similar-to-superior image quality compared with standard CTA.⁵The aim of our study was to test the diagnostic performance of timing-invariant CTA for stroke evaluation, to assess whether standard CTA can be omitted when CT perfusion imaging has been performed.     

Transseptal endocardial left ventricular pacing: an alternative technique for coronary sinus lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement for transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a failure rate at implant and short-term follow-up between 10% and 15%. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of transseptal endocardial LV pacing in patients in whom transvenous CS lead placement had failed. METHODS: An atrial transseptal LV lead placement was attempted in 10 patients (six females, age 69.4 +/- 9.6 years), in whom CS lead placement for CRT had failed. After transseptal puncture and septal dilatation from the femoral route, the left atrium was cannulated with a combination of catheters and guide wires from the left or right subclavian vein. After advancement of this guide catheter into the LV, a standard bipolar screw-in lead could be implanted in the posterolateral wall. All patients were maintained on anticoagulant therapy with warfarin after implant. RESULTS: An LV lead could be successfully implanted in nine of the 10 patients. The stimulation threshold was 0.78 +/- 0.24 V, and the R-wave amplitude was 14.2 +/- 9.7 mV. At 2 months' follow-up, the stimulation threshold was 1.48 +/- 0.35 V with a 0.064 +/- 0.027 ms pulse width. There was no phrenic nerve stimulation observed in any of the patients. There were no thromboembolic complications at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LV transseptal endocardial lead implantation from the pectoral area is a feasible approach in patients with a failed CS approach and in whom epicardial surgical lead placement is not an option. Longer follow-up is warranted to determine the risk of thromboembolic complications.