The dentists' relationships and the therapists' dilemmas

In order to highlight similarities and differences in the responses and ethical decisions of therapists from different professional trainings and differing cultural backgrounds, three experienced practitioners were each invited to write a commentary on their ethical stance in response to a clinical situation provided by the Editors in the Case Notes which are presented below.     

Intake of aspirin prior to metamizole does not completely prevent high on treatment platelet reactivity

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology - Metamizole can sterically inhibit aspirin (ASA) from binding to cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1). It is recommended that ASA should be taken 30 min prior to...     

Structurating Expanded Genetic Carrier Screening: A Longitudinal Analysis of Online News Coverage

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) is a genetic test that is designed to assess the risk of a healthy person passing down a genetic disorder, such as spinal muscular atrophy, to future children. ECS screens for up to several hundred disorders in one test, expanding on traditional carrier screening tests that target one or a few genetic disorders. However, little is known about how this health technology is being presented to the public in media coverage. Accordingly, this study is a qualitative content analysis of online news and information of ECS over a 6-year period, beginning in 2010 when the technology was publicly available. Results indicate that major coverage themes were consistent across the years included, although content within those themes changed over time. Using structuration theory to guide analysis, results reveal that online news and information from 2010 to 2015 structurated ECS as a health technology innovation, an opportunity for business and investment, and a tool for family planning. Results are discussed in terms of implications for future research, for health journalism practice, and for clinical interactions.     

Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups

The Kessler 10 (K10) and embedded Kessler 6 (K6) was developed to screen for non‐specific psychological distress and serious mental illness in mental health surveys of English‐speaking populations, but has been adopted in Western and non‐Western countries as a screening and outcome measure in primary care and mental health settings. This review examines whether the original K6/K10's validity for culturally diverse populations was established, and whether the cultural equivalence, and sensitivity to change of translated or culturally adapted K6/K10s, has been demonstrated with culturally diverse client groups. Evidence for the original K6/K10's validity for culturally diverse populations is limited. Questions about the conceptual and linguistic equivalence of translated/adapted K6/K10s arise from reports of changes in item connotation and differential item functioning. Evidence for structural equivalence is inconsistent, as is support for criterion equivalence, with the majority of studies compromising on accuracy in case prediction. Research demonstrating sensitivity to change with culturally diverse groups is lacking. Inconsistent evidence for the K6/K10's cultural appropriateness in clinical settings, and a lack of clinical norms for either majority or culturally diverse groups, indicate the importance of further research into the psychological distress construct with culturally diverse clients, and the need for caution in interpreting K6/K10 scores. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.