Outcome and Prognostic Factors After Adrenalectomy for Patients with Distant Adrenal Metastasis

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe a single-institution experience with adrenal metastasectomy and to elucidate factors that may bear prognostic significance.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients with adrenal metastasis who underwent adrenalectomy performed with curative intent between 2000 and 2012. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival from time of adrenalectomy to death or last follow-up. Primary endpoint was death from any cause. Clinical variables were examined for association with survival.

Results

The study included 62 patients with mean age of 60 (±12) years; 55 % (34 of 62) were male, 85 % (53 of 62) presented with isolated adrenal metastasis, and 82 % (51 of 62) had metachronous disease with median disease-free interval (DFI) of 22 months (range, 6–217 months). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common primary comprising 50 % of cases. Median survival for the study population was 30 months (range, 1–145 months) and 5-year survival was 31 %. Patients with NSCLC had significantly shortened survival compared with non-NSCLC with median and 5-year survival of 17 versus 47 months and 27 % versus 38 %, respectively (p = .033). Synchronous metastasis (p = .028) and DFI < 12 months (p = .038) were also associated with worse survival outcome, though male gender (p = .69) and oligometastatic disease (p = .62) were not.

Conclusions

Adrenal metastasectomy resulted in median survival of 30 months and 5-year survival of 31 %. Shorter survival was associated with lung primary, short disease-free interval, and synchronous metastasis, but not with the presence of oligometastatic disease provided that the primary cancer and additional metastatic lesions were adequately controlled and amenable to resection.     

Aortic Bulge: A Possible Predictive Sign of Impending Aortoenteric Fistula

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to introduce the aortic bulge sign, a finding observed retrospectively on computed tomography prior to the acute presentation of aortoenteric fistula, and to determine its interobserver reliability.MethodsFollowing research ethics board approval, all cases of aortoenteric fistula at our institution occurring from 2011–2015 were identified retrospectively. All previous computed tomography images of patients who eventually developed aortoenteric fistula were reviewed by a single observer for the presence of a potentially predictive finding of fistulization, the aortic bulge sign. These previous images were then combined with age and sex matched controls into a case bank. Eight radiology residents and staff were instructed in observing the aortic bulge sign. These observers then reviewed the case bank in a blinded analysis to determine the interobserver reliability of this finding.ResultsFourteen cases of aortoenteric were identified. The average patient age was 70.71 years with a male-to-female ratio of 11:3. Eleven patients had previous computed tomography images available for review. With blinded analysis by multiple observers, the aortic bulge sign was identified with greater than 80% agreement in six of 11 cases (66.67%). Fleiss' kappa was calculated at k = 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.50–0.69), corresponding to moderate-to-substantial interobserver agreement.ConclusionsThe aortic bulge sign has been retrospectively identified as a promising computed tomography finding of eventual aortoenteric fistula prior to acute presentation. Further study is required to determine the diagnostic value of this sign.