A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Contrast Baths

Study DesignSystematic review.IntroductionContrast baths are used as an intervention in hand therapy, yet it is unclear which patients, if any, benefit from this intervention.Purpose of the StudyTo examine the nature and quality of the evidence regarding the use of contrast baths using a systematic review process.MethodsOf a total of 28 clinical research articles on contrast baths, from 1938 forward, ten met the inclusion criteria set by the authors.ResultsThese studies addressed the physiological changes of hot and cold on blood flow, intramuscular temperature, subcutaneous temperature, and the influence of room temperature and age. The subjects included normal/healthy volunteers and patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, or foot/ankle injuries. The diversity of conditions, protocols, and outcomes limited the ability to make definitive conclusions on efficacy.ConclusionsThe contrast bath procedure may increase superficial blood flow and skin temperature, though the evidence on the impact on edema is conflicting. No relationship between physiologic effects and functional outcomes has been established.Level of Evidence: 2A     

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on diffuse inflammatory activation of de novo atheromatous lesions: Implications for systemic inflammation

AimsLocal coronary and systemic inflammation is pronounced in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Intracoronary thermography detects local inflammation and C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker of systemic inflammation. We investigated whether or not, in patients with DM, thermal heterogeneity of culprit lesions (CLs) correlates with that of non-culprit lesions (NCLs) and with systemic inflammation.MethodsWe included DM patients who had two angiographically significant lesions and were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We measured the temperature difference (ΔT) between the lesion and proximal vessel wall.ResultsWe included 104 (n = 208 lesions) patients: 32 (n = 64 lesions) had DM and 72 (n = 144 lesions) were non-DM (control group). ΔT was increased in DM in both CLs and NCLs (CLs: DM = 0.12 ± 0.06 °C; no DM = 0.06 ± 0.04 °C; P < 0.01 versus NCLs: DM = 0.13 ± 0.08 °C versus no DM = 0.06 ± 0.05 °C; P < 0.01). Patients with DM had similar ΔT in CLs and NCLs (P = 0.49). A linear correlation was detected between heat production in all lesions and CRP (R = 0.45; P < 0.01), which was attributed to the correlation of ΔT in lesions of patients with DM and CRP (R = 0.32; P < 0.01). In lesions of patients with low CRP, a greater rate of discrepancy was found, as 100% of lesions in patients with DM versus 66.1% of lesions of patients without DM had a high ΔT in one or both lesions (P < 0.01).ConclusionIn patients with DM, local inflammatory activation is diffuse and correlates with systemic inflammation. However, low systemic inflammatory activation does not always predict an increase in local thermal heterogeneity.     

Pregnancy and Renal Transplantation: A Case Report of the Risk of Antibody Induction Against Partner Antigens

Renal transplantation has provided women of childbearing age with increased fertility and the possibility of successful pregnancy outcomes. Approximately 14,000 births among women with transplanted organs have been reported worldwide, but pregnancy complications have been frequent: spontaneous or therapeutic abortion, preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Herein we have described a case of an acute rejection episode in a renal transplant recipient, occurring 6 months after successful delivery, despite the fulfillment of all European best practice guidelines criteria and the maintenance of adequate immunosuppression. Our case demonstrated that even a presumably low-risk patient can face worsening of renal function during or after pregnancy. Acute immune activation is uncommon but may occur in late-onset fashion. Despite adequate levels of maintenance immunosuppression, there is a risk of developing antibodies against the partner or the donor, causing acute renal immune damage.     

Hyperemic Islets: A Possible Explanation for Poor Yields in Human and Porcine Islet Isolation

When studying histological characteristics of human and porcine pancreata in relation to islet isolation, we encountered a remarkably high number of hyperemic islets. The abnormalities observed in these islets ranged from a single dilated vessel through multiple widely dilated vessels to hemorrhages extending into the surrounding exocrine tissue. We determined their possible relevance for outcomes of islet isolation. This study involved a histological examination of 143 porcine pancreata (72 juvenile and 71 adult) and islet isolation from 48 adult pancreata. Human pancreata obtained from 71 multiple organ donors yielded islet isolation in 24 cases. To determine their endocrine content, tissue samples were stained with Aldehyde Fuchsin. The presence of hyperemic islets was scored semiquantitatively with pancreata allotted to categories based on the severity. In humans and pigs we observed hyperemic islets in 48% of pancreata, but only 4.0 ± 2.4% of the islets were hyperemic. In both humans and pigs, significantly higher endocrine content was found in the most severely affected pancreata. When the higher endocrine content was taken into account and isolation results were expressed as ratios of yield and content, we observed significantly lower yields in the most affected pancreata in pigs with a trend toward lower yields in humans. A substantial proportion of human and porcine pancreata contain hyperemic islets. Although the results in humans are preliminary, our data suggest that this phenomenon may contribute to the unpredictable, highly variable islet yields in pigs and humans.     

Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome in Subjects Treated Medically for Acute Pancreatitis: A Follow-Up Study

Aims: To explore the quality of life in patients treated medically during the acute phase of pancreatitis as well as at 2 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital. Patients: 40 patients were studied. The etiology of the pancreatitis was biliary causes in 31 patients and non-biliary causes in 9; mild disease was present in 29 patients and severe disease in 11. 30 patients completed the two surveys at 2 and 12 months after hospital discharge. Methods: The SF-12 and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires were used for the purpose of the study. Results: The two physical and mental component summaries of SF-12, all the domains of EORTC QLQ-C30 (except for physical functioning and cognitive functioning) and some symptom scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 (fatigue, nausea/ vomiting, pain, and constipation) were significantly impaired during the acute phase of pancreatitis. There was a significant improvement in the SF-12 physical component summary, and global health, role functioning, social functioning, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, and financial difficulties (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 2 months after discharge as compared to the basal evaluation. Similar results were found after 12 months except for the mental component score at 12-month evaluation, which was significantly impaired in acute pancreatitis patients in comparison to the norms. The physical functioning of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at basal evaluation was significantly impaired in patients with severe pancreatitis in comparison to patients with mild pancreatitis. Conclusions: Two different patterns can be recognized in the quality of life of patients with acute pancreatitis: physical impairment is immediately present followed by mental impairment which appears progressively in the follow-up period.