Estimating gene penetrance from family data

Family data are useful for estimating disease risk in carriers of specific genotypes of a given gene (penetrance). Penetrance is frequently estimated assuming that relatives' phenotypes are independent, given their genotypes for the gene of interest. This assumption is unrealistic when multiple shared risk factors contribute to disease risk. In this setting, the phenotypes of relatives are correlated even after adjustment for the genotypes of any one gene (residual correlation). Many methods have been proposed to address this problem, but their performance has not been evaluated systematically. In simulations we generated genotypes for a rare (frequency 0.35%) allele of moderate penetrance, and a common (frequency 15%) allele of low penetrance, and then generated correlated disease survival times using the Clayton‐Oakes copula model. We ascertained families using both population and clinic designs. We then compared the estimates of several methods to the optimal ones obtained from the model used to generate the data. We found that penetrance estimates for common low‐risk genotypes were more robust to model misspecification than those for rare, moderate‐risk genotypes. For the latter, penetrance estimates obtained ignoring residual disease correlation had large biases. Also biased were estimates based only on families that segregate the risk allele. In contrast, a method for accommodating phenotype correlation by assuming the presence of genetic heterogeneity performed nearly optimally, even when the survival data were coded as binary outcomes. We conclude that penetrance estimates that accommodate residual phenotype correlation (even only approximately) outperform those that ignore it, and that coding censored survival outcomes as binary does not substantially increase the mean‐square errror of the estimates, provided the censoring is not extensive. Genet. Epidemiol. 34: 373–381, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Lymphoceles: imaging characteristics and percutaneous management

Twenty-five patients who had lymphoceles underwent sectional imaging and interventional radiologic procedures. Viewed using sonography, lymphoceles were hypoechoic to anechoic, occasionally with internal septa and debris. Low numbers (occasionally negative values) were observed using computed tomography (CT); these numbers strongly suggest the diagnosis of lymphocele. Calcification was observed on CT images of one patient. Diagnostic aspiration revealed tan to yellow fluid containing many lymphocytes; pathognomonic fat globules were observed in four cases. Malignant cells were found in two collections, an unusual occurrence. Therapeutic needle aspiration and short-term catheter drainage were usually unsuccessful (only one of five patients [20%] was cured). Long-term (1-5-week) catheter drainage cured 11 of 14 patients (78.6%). Sclerosing agents may have been beneficial for lymphocele obliteration in three of four patients. For most patients, lymphoceles may be diagnosed and treated successfully using radiologic means.     

Markers of HIV infection in the Concorde trial. Concorde Co-ordinating Committee

The Concorde trial compared immediate (Imm) with deferred (Def) AZT monotherapy in asymptomatic HIV-positive participants. Haematological and immunological markers and weight were measured throughout, and correlated with clinical endpoints. Markers associated with disease progression (CD4 lymphocyte count and percentage, platelets, p24 antigen and beta 2 microglobulin favoured Imm: those associated with toxicity (haemoglobin, neutrophils and white cell count) favoured Def. CD8 and total lymphocyte count did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate analysis, the combination of baseline CD4, p24 antigen and beta 2m was the best baseline predictor of disease. Including change in CD4 and beta 2m at 12 weeks, or changes over follow- up in these markers significantly improved the fit. Markers were also incorporated into the definition of 'clinical' endpoints. Hazard ratio estimates from end-points that included CD4 < 50 and CD4 < 25 were closest to those for AIDS or death alone, but added very few extra events. Use of other landmark CD4 counts (100 or greater) or relative decreases in counts (25% or more) increased the number of events, but overestimated the effect of immediate AZT. Although AZT had a beneficial effect on the surrogate markers of efficacy evaluated, these changes did not predict clinical outcome, nor could the markers be usefully incorporated into an endpoint definition.      

High-dose atorvastatin therapy in severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Lipid targets can be difficult to attain in familial hypercholesterolaemia. To compare atorvastatin with simvastatin- fenofibrate and simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy, we studied 54 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia over periods of 2-6 months on each therapeutic regimen. The atorvastatin regimen reduced total cholesterol by 41.2 +/- 11.2%, LDL by 45.6 +/- 15.5%, triglycerides by 33.8 +/- 24.8%, and increased HDL by 2.3 +/- 37.0%. Simvastatin- fenofibrate therapy achieved reductions of 33.9 +/- 8.5% in cholesterol, 42.0 +/- 12.2% in LDL, 34.7 +/- 38.3% for triglycerides, and a 25.4 +/- 55.1% increase in HDL. Simvastatin-cholestyramine gave a reduction of 31.3 +/- 11.8% in cholesterol, 36.0 +/- 14.4% in LDL, 13.7 +/- 36.3% in triglycerides, and a 1.1 +/- 30.3% rise in HDL. The atorvastatin regimen was marginally but not significantly better than simvastatin-fenofibrate in improving the LDL:HDL ratio, LDL:apoB and and apolipoprotein B:A1 ratios. Eleven patients (20.4%) had side- effects: two discontinued atorvastatin due to side-effects; two patients had rashes; six had myalgia and two had diarrhoea. Gastrointestinal side-effects were described in 16 (30.1%) patients on simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy and four cases of myalgia (11.2%) were seen with simvastatin-fenofibrate. In nine patients on atorvastatin (20.4%) a 30% or greater fall in HDL was observed, compared to five patients with resin therapy (9.2%) and two with fibrate therapy (5.5%). There were no significant differences in liver or muscle biochemistry between the regimens, but atorvastatin did raise transaminase and creatine kinase concentrations significantly compared to pre-treatment values (p = 0.001). Atorvastatin significantly improves the lipid profile in most patients compared with other regimens. It has a comparable incidence of side-effects to combination therapy regimens.      

Characterization of the epitope recognized by a monoclonal antibody highly specific for blood group M antigen

The mouse monoclonal antibody M2A1 of IgG1 class, which is highly specific for blood group M antigen, was obtained and characterized by means of hemagglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting, and inhibition assays. The use of modified M glycoprotein preparations for inhibition tests and of variant McN and Henshaw red cell membranes for immunoblotting showed that M2A1 recognized an epitope including the NH2-terminal serine and sialic acid residues of glycophorin A, whereas the fifth glycine residue was not involved. The reactivity of the antibody with M antigen was distinctly dependent on ionic strength and pH; the optimum was at pH 8 to 9. The alpha-amino group of terminal serine residue was not necessary for the reaction with M2A1 antibody, and the results obtained suggested that the positive charge of this group contributed to decreasing antigen-antibody reactions at pH below 8. The reaction of the antibody with blood group N antigen was not detectable in any of the assays used.     

Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications

BACKGROUND: The knowledge explosion in health care coupled with recent evidence-based practice initiatives has increased both the need for and the production of reviews of past research. The proliferation of such reviews has contributed to inconsistency in methods and terminology. Differing methods for integrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and qualitative reviews have been proposed, yet are not clearly differentiated in published reports. Although there are common features to these methods, each method has a distinct purpose, sampling frame, definition, and type of analysis. APPROACH: The literature on research review methods was analyzed and synthesized. Specific attention was directed toward the issues specific to combining primary nursing research studies. RESULTS: The defining characteristics of different research review methods, the common stages of all research reviews, and criteria for evaluating quality are described. DISCUSSION: Greater clarity regarding research review methods has the potential to enhance methodological rigor and subsequently the applicability of findings of all review methods to practice and policy.     

Head-Up Tilt Test in Patients with High Pretest Likelihood of Neurally Mediated Syncope: An Approximation to the "Real Sensitivity" of this Testing

This study was designed to examine the "true sensitivity" of a specific head-up tilt (HUT) testing protocol using clinical findings. The HUT protocol used 45 minutes at 60 degrees for the baseline portion and intermittent boluses of 2, 4, and 6 micrograms of isoproterenol in the second phase. Eighty-eight patients (40 men and 48 women; mean age of 33.8 +/- 16 years) with recurrent syncope and high pretest likelihood of neurally mediated syncope were included. The following were considerated as high pretest likelihood criteria: (1) at least two syncopal episodes; (2) no structural heart disease and normal baseline ECG; (3) age < 65 years; (4) a typical history of neurally mediated syncope, triggering factors plus premonitory signs; and (5) short duration of symptoms and fast recovery without neurological sequelae. Fifty-four patients (61%) had a positive tilt test (34/88 baseline [39%] and 20/50 with isoproterenol [40%]). The shorter time interval between the last syncopal episode and baseline HUT test was the only predictor for a positive response (P < 0.003). Conversely, this time interval was not predictor of positive responses during isoproterenol-tilt testing. In conclusion: (1) we claim a "sensitivity" for this combined protocol of 61%; and (2) our results indicate that patients with syncope of unknown origin must be tilted nearest as possible to the last syncope to increase the positive responses of HUT test.