Arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method: A preliminary report

BackgroundIn this report, we describe our preliminary clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method.MethodFrom August 2009 to December 2011, arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion using this method was performed in 16 consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled. Fifteen shoulders were treated with two-anchor sutures and one was treated with three-anchor sutures. Twelve patients received metallic anchor screws and four patients received bioanchor screws. The assessments were performed using the Rowe score, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the shoulder range of motion (ROM) deficit.ResultsWith an average follow-up period of 22.9 months, all shoulder scores improved after surgery (p < 0.001). The average ROM deficit of the operated shoulders was not significant as compared with the healthy side in forward elevation (p > 0.05), but was significant in external rotation (p < 0.05). All of the 16 shoulders remained stable (100%) after the arthroscopic repair surgery. All patients returned to their preinjury levels of daily activity without recurrent problems.ConclusionIn patients with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability, arthroscopic Bankart repair with the two portal method can provide good results. It can be an alternative method of treating patients with Bankart lesion without associated major glenoid defect or rotator cuff lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior instability.     

Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

OBJECTIVES: Poor outcomes have been reported with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Unsupported endografts with active fixation may offer certain advantages in this situation. We compared EVAR results using the Ancure (Guidant) endograft in patients with and without hostile neck anatomy. METHODS: Records of EVAR patients from October 1999 to July 2002 at a tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed from a division database. Patients with elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair during the same period were reviewed to determine those unsuitable for EVAR. Hostile neck anatomy, assessed by computer tomography (CT) scans and angiograms, was defined as one or more of the following: (1) neck length 3 mm, (3) >2-mm reverse taper within 1 cm below the renal arteries, (4) neck thrombus > or =50% of circumference, and (5) angulation > or =60 degrees within 3 cm below renals. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two patients underwent EVAR with an average follow-up of 18 months. Patients in Phase II trials (n = 41), repaired with other graft types (n = 48), or without complete anatomic records (n = 27) were excluded. Demographics and co-morbidities were similar in the 115 good-neck (GN) and 91 bad-neck (BN) patients except for age (mean, 72.9 years GN vs 75.7 BN; P = 0.13), gender (11% female GN vs 22% BN; P =.04); neck length (mean, 21.8 mm GN vs 14.4 mm BN: P <.001), and angulation (mean, 22 degrees GN vs 40 degrees BN; (P <.001). Perioperative mortality (0 GN vs 1.1% BN), late mortality (5.2% GN vs 4.4% BN), all endoleaks (19.1% GN vs 17.6% BN), proximal endoleaks (0.8% GN vs 2.1% BN), and graft migration (0 for both groups) did not reach statistical significance. Neck anatomy precluded EVAR in 106 of 165 (64%) patients with open AAA. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupported endografts with active fixation can yield excellent results in treating many medically compromised patients with hostile neck anatomy. Nonetheless, an unsuitable neck remains the most frequent cause for open abdominal AAA.     

Prophylacticiv ondansetron reduces nausea, vomiting and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of ondansetron on nausea and vomiting following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control. METHODS: Seventy women (n = 35 in each group) undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study. At the end of surgery, all patients received epidural morphine 3 mg for postoperative pain relief. Before morphine injection, the ondansetron group received iv ondansetron 4 mg, whereas the placebo group received iv saline. RESULTS: Patients in the ondansetron group reported a lower frequency of total postoperative nausea and vomiting (22%) and lower frequency of rescue antiemetic request (12%) than those in the placebo group (52% and 39%, respectively; P < 0.05). In addition, ondansetron was associated with a reduced incidence of pruritus following epidural morphine (28% vs 58%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that iv ondansetron 4 mg is effective in the prevention of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control.     

Can the Internal Iliac Artery Be Safely Covered during Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic and Iliac Artery Aneurysms?

Aneurysmal involvement of the common iliac (CIA) or the internal iliac arteries (IIA) have been relative contraindications for safe endovascular aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Our goal was to review our experience in dealing with this problem by performing permanent coverage of one or both IIA during endoluminal repair of aneurysms of the aortoiliac region and to develop a safe, durable strategy. Of the 228 consecutive patients who had endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic (AAA) and iliac artery (IAA) aneurysms between 4/1999 and 4/2001 at our institution, 49 patients underwent coverage and/or coil embolization of one or both IIA during repair because of complex aortoiliac anatomy. These patients were evaluated prospectively for short-term adverse outcome. These results showed that CIA or IIA aneurysms can be managed safely during endoluminal repair of AAA. The IIA can be covered or embolized with minimum adverse consequences in patients who have inadequate CIA for deployment of the aortic or iliac endograft. Unilateral IIA occlusion is well tolerated. We advocate that whenever bilateral IIA occlusion is necessary during endovascular aneurysm repair, one of the IIAs should be revascularized if it is not aneurysmal.     

The prophylactic effect of tropisetron on epidural morphine-related nausea and vomiting: a comparison of dexamethasone with saline

Tropisetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 receptor antagonist that is primarily used in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We evaluated the prophylactic effect of tropisetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone and saline served as controls. One-hundred twenty women (n = 40 in each of three groups) undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study. At the end of surgery, Group 1 received IV tropisetron 5 mg, whereas Groups 2 and 3 received dexamethasone 5 mg and saline, respectively. We found that tropisetron did not significantly reduce the occurrence of nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone, however, reduced the total incidence of nausea and vomiting from 59% to 21% (P < 0.01) and the percentage of patients requiring rescue antiemetic from 38% to 13% (P < 0.05). We conclude that IV tropisetron 5 mg did not prevent the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. IV dexamethasone 5 mg was effective for this purpose. IMPLICATIONS: We compared the prophylactic IV administration of tropisetron 5 mg to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with epidural morphine with dexamethasone 5 mg and saline in women undergoing hysterectomy. We found that tropisetron 5 mg did not significantly reduce the occurrence of PONV associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone 5 mg was effective for this purpose.     

Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of human inducible nitric oxide synthase in porcine vein grafts inhibits intimal hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether adenoviral inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene transfer could inhibit intimal hyperplasia (IH) in porcine internal jugular veins interposed into the carotid artery circulation. METHODS: Porcine internal jugular veins were transduced passively with 1 x 10(11) particles of an adenoviral vector carrying either the human iNOS (AdiNOS) or beta-galactosidase (AdlacZ) cDNA for 30 minutes and then interposed into the carotid artery circulation. Segments of each vein graft were maintained in an ex vivo organ culture to measure nitrite accumulation, a marker of nitric oxide synthesis. The grafts were analyzed immunohistochemically for the presence of neutrophils, macrophages, and leukocytes by staining for myeloperoxidase, ED1, and CD45, respectively, at 3 (n = 4) and 7 (n = 4) days. Morphometric analyses and cellular proliferation (Ki67 staining) were assessed at 3 (n = 4), 7 (n = 4), and 21 days (n = 8). RESULTS: AdlacZ-treated vein grafts demonstrated high levels of beta-galactosidase expression at 3 days with a gradual decline thereafter. Nitrite production from AdiNOS-treated vein grafts was approximately fivefold greater than AdlacZ-treated grafts (P =.00001). AdiNOS or AdlacZ treatment was associated with minimal graft inflammation. Cellular proliferation rates were significantly reduced in AdiNOS-treated grafts as compared with controls at both 3 (41%, P =.000004) and 7 days (32%, P =.0001) after bypass. This early antiproliferative effect was most pronounced at the distal anastomosis (65%, P =.0005). The iNOS gene transfer reduced the intimal/medial area ratio in vein grafts at 7 (36%, P =.009) and 21 days (30%, P =.007) versus controls. This inhibition of IH was again more prominent in the distal segments of the grafts (P =.01). CONCLUSION: Adenovirus-mediated iNOS gene transfer to porcine internal jugular vein grafts effectively reduced cellular proliferation and IH. Although iNOS gene transfer reduced IH throughout the entire vein graft, the most pronounced effect was measured at the distal anastomosis. These results suggest potential for iNOS-based genetic modification of vein grafts to prolong graft patency.     

Hospitalized osteoporotic vertebral fracture increases the risk of stroke: A population‐based cohort study

The association between osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases has been demonstrated. Higher cardiovascular risk has also been correlated with vertebral fractures. However, the association between osteoporotic vertebral fracture and the possibly higher risk of stroke remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk, and type of stroke in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture were identified (n = 380) and 10 age‐ and sex‐matched controls per case (comparison group, n = 3795) were chosen from a nationwide representative cohort of 999,997 people from 1998 to 2005. Both groups were followed‐up for stroke events for 3 years, matched by propensity scores with adjustments for covariates such as comorbidities (ie, hypertension, diabetes, arrhythmia, or coronary heart diseases) and exposure to medications (ie, aspirin, lipid lowering drug, or nitrates), and assessed by Kaplan‐Meier and Cox regression analyses. The incidence rate of stroke in the osteoporotic vertebral fracture group (37.5 per 1000 person‐years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.5–51.2) was significantly higher than in the comparison group (14.0 per 1000 person‐years; 95% CI, 12.0–16.4, p < 0.001). Stroke was more likely to occur in the osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients than in the normal controls (crude hazard ratio [HR] 2.68, 95% CI 1.89–3.79, p < 0.001; adjusted HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.90–3.86, p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture have a higher risk of stroke (ie, both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and require stroke prevention strategies. © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Dextromethorphan as an Adjunct in Opioid-Dependent Patients Undergoing Methadone Maintenance Treatment

Background:

Low-dose dextromethorphan (DM) might have anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic effects mechanistically remote from an NMDA receptor. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled 12 week study, we investigated whether add-on dextromethorphan reduced cytokine levels and benefitted opioid-dependent patients undergoing methadone maintenance therapy (MMT).

Methods:

Patients were randomly assigned to a group: DM60 (60mg/day dextromethorphan; n = 65), DM120 (120mg/day dextromethorphan; n = 65), or placebo (n = 66). Primary outcomes were the methadone dose required, plasma morphine level, and retention in treatment. Plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, transforming growth factor–β1, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels were examined during weeks 0, 1, 4, 8, and 12. Multiple linear regressions with generalized estimating equation methods were used to examine the therapeutic effect.

Results:

After 12 weeks, the DM60 group had significantly longer treatment retention and lower plasma morphine levels than did the placebo group. Plasma TNF-α was significantly decreased in the DM60 group compared to the placebo group. However, changes in plasma cytokine levels, BDNF levels, and the methadone dose required in the three groups were not significantly different.

Conclusions:

We provide evidence—decreased concomitant heroin use—of low-dose add-on DM’s efficacy for treating opioid-dependent patients undergoing MMT.