Motivation to Consent and Adhere to the FORT Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this qualitative study was to identify the motivational factors that influence cancer survivors to participate and adhere to the fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) FORT randomized controlled trial (RCT). Fifteen women diagnosed with breast and gynecological cancer who took part in the FORT RCT were interviewed about their experience to consent and adhere to the trial. The transcribed interviews were content analyzed within a relational autonomy framework. The analysis revealed that the participants’ motivation to consent and adhere to the FORT RCT was structured around thirteen subthemes grouped into four overarching themes: (1) Personal Influential Factors; (2) Societal Motivations; (3) Structural Influences; and (4) Gains in Emotional Support. The unique structures of the trial such as the group format, the friendships formed with other participants in their group and with the group leaders, and the right timing of the trial within their cancer survivorship trajectory all contributed to their motivation to consent and adhere to the FORT RCT. While their initial motivation to participate was mostly altruistic, it was their personal gains obtained over the course of the trial that contributed to their adherence. Potential gains in emotional and social support from psycho-oncology trials should be capitalized when approaching future participants as a mean to improve on motivations to consent and adhere.     

Combining Analysis of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) and PD-L1 Refined the Prognostication of Breast Cancer Subtypes

BackgroundPD-L1 has been used as a biomarker to select patients for treatment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we assessed the clinicopathological features of breast cancers that are associated with PD-L1 expression, as well as its relationship with other immune components and its prognostic significance.ResultsTotally 1752 cases were included in this cohort. PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (PD-L1-IC) expression and in tumor cells (PD-L1-TC) expression were identified in 34.2% and 10.1% of cases, respectively, and they showed a positive correlation with higher tumor grade, morphological apocrine features, presence of necrosis, and higher stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL). PD-L1-IC and PD-L1-TC expression correlated positively with each other, and both of them were negatively associated with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and positively associated with Ki67, HER2, EGFR, p63, and p-cadherin. In survival analysis, PD-L1-IC expression was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in HER2-overexpressed (HER2-OE) cancers and high–grade luminal B cancers. In triple–negative breast cancers (TNBC) and HER2–OE cancers, compared with sTIL low PD-L1-IC negative cases, sTIL high cases showed significantly better DFS independent of PD-L1-IC status. sTIL low PD-L1-IC positive cases also demonstrated a better DFS in HER2–OE cancers. In high–grade luminal B cancers, sTIL high PD-L1-IC positive cases showed the best BCSS.ConclusionThe data suggested that the combining analysis of sTIL and PD-L1-IC expression refined the prognostication of breast cancer subtypes. Cases with high TIL and PD-LI-IC expression appear to be more immune active.     

High WT1 gene expression before haematopoietic stem cell transplant in children with acute myeloid leukaemia predicts poor event-free survival

WT1 gene expression has been proposed as a useful marker of minimal residual disease in leukaemia. Its utility in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has not been studied. We studied the prognostic value of WT1 expression in peripheral blood prior to HSCT in 36 children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Samples were obtained 2 weeks pre-transplant to determine the level of WT1 expression. WT1 expression was normalized using K562 cells as a control and a relative value of 0·5 was chosen as the cut-off point between high and low WT1 expression. The median level of pre-transplant WT1 expression in the 36 patients was 0·09 (range 0·0001–11·0), with 11patients having WT1 ≥  0·5 and 25, WT1  <   0·5. After HSCT, 76% of patients with high pre-transplant WT1 expression relapsed, in contrast to 0% of the patients with low WT1 expression. Those with high WT1 expression had significantly lower 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (18%, 95% CI 0–40%) as compared to those with low WT1 expression (68%, 95% CI 50–86%, P  = 0·007). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant WT1 level is the only significant prognostic factor for the difference in EFS. Our finding suggests that elevated WT1 gene expression before HSCT in paediatric AML predicts relapse and poor long-term EFS. A larger prospective study is warranted to compare the value of high WT1 expression and other markers of minimal residue disease in predicting clinical outcomes after HSCT.