Sampling Males Who Inject Drugs in Haiphong,Vietnam: Comparison of Time-Location and Respondent-Driven Sampling Methods

Accurate measurements of HIV prevalence and associated risk factors among hidden and high-risk groups are vital for program planning and implementation. However, only two sampling methods are purported to provide representative estimates for populations without sampling frames: time-location sampling (TLS) and respondent-driven sampling (RDS). Each method is subject to potential biases and questionable reliability. In this paper, we evaluate surveys designed to estimate HIV prevalence and associated risk factors among people who inject drugs (PWID) sampled through TLS versus RDS. In 2012, males aged ≥16 years who reported injecting drugs in the previous month and living in Haiphong, Vietnam, were sampled using TLS or RDS. Data from each survey were analyzed to compare HIV prevalence, related risk factors, socio-demographic characteristics, refusal estimates, and time and expenditures for field implementation. TLS (n = 432) and RDS (n = 415) produced similarly high estimates for HIV prevalence. Significantly lower proportions of PWID sampled through RDS received methadone treatment or met an outreach worker. Refusal estimates were lower for TLS than for RDS. Total expenditures per sample collected and number of person-days of staff effort were higher for TLS than for RDS. Both survey methods were successful in recruiting a diverse sample of PWID in Haiphong. In Vietnam, surveys of PWID are conducted throughout the country; although the refusal estimate was calculated to be much higher for RDS than TLS, RDS in Haiphong appeared to sample PWID with less exposure to services and required fewer financial and staff resources compared with TLS.     

An efficient access to β-ketosulfones via β-sulfonylvinylamines: metal–organic framework catalysis for the direct C–S coupling of sodium sulfinates with oxime acetates

A copper-based framework Cu₂(OBA)₂(BPY) was synthesized and used as a recyclable heterogeneous catalyst for the synthesis of β-sulfonylvinylamines from sodium sulfinates and oxime acetates via direct C–S coupling reaction. The transformation was remarkably affected by the solvent, and chlorobenzene emerged as the best option. This Cu-MOF displayed higher activity than numerous conventional homogeneous and MOF-based catalysts. The catalyst was reutilized many times in the synthesis of β-sulfonylvinylamines without considerably deteriorating in catalytic efficiency. These β-sulfonylvinylamines were readily converted to the corresponding β-ketosulfones via a hydrolysis step with aqueous HCl solution. To the best of our knowledge, this direct C–S coupling reaction to achieve β-sulfonylvinylamines was not previously conducted with a heterogeneous catalyst.

Cu₂(OBA)₂(BPY) was used as catalyst for the synthesis of β-sulfonylvinylamines from sodium sulfinates and oxime acetates. These β-sulfonylvinylamines were readily converted to corresponding β-ketosulfones via a hydrolysis step.     

Impact of the sleep apnea management group clinic on positive airway pressure adherence

Sleep and Breathing - Positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence is critical for managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We postulate that group-based Sleep Apnea Management (SAM) clinic,...     

Nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus in community skilled nursing facility patients

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCNS) are increasing nosocomial pathogens in acute care hospital patients. However, there is little information on the epidemiology of MRCNS in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). We report a pilot survey of the prevalence of MRCNS colonization in SNF patients. METHODS: Anterior nasal swabs were plated on oxacillin salt screening agar for selection of MRCNS. Suspected MRCNS were confirmed by coagulase and catalase tests and standard disc-diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility tests. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of MRCNS was 40% for in-house continuing SNF patients, 49% for newly admitted patients, and 60% for SNF nursing personnel. The prevalence was 13% in a "control" group of nonmedical personnel. Forty-six percent of MRCNS were resistant to ciprofloxacin. The frequency of colonization with MRCNS increased over time. After an average 17 months of facility stay, 32% of noncarriers acquired MRCNS. High frequency of colonization was associated with greater disability. CONCLUSION: Colonization with MRCNS is common among SNF patients, who can serve as a reservoir for transfer of such strains to acute care hospitals. Careful infection control practice, including judicious use of antibiotics with frequent handwashing, will remain critical policies for limiting spread of such strains.