The role of the tissue adhesive fibrin seal (FS) in esophageal anastomoses

Following Surgical Removal Of Esophageal Tumors, Leakage And Medistinitis Is A Frequent And Often Fatal Complication. A New Method Has Been Developed To Seal Suture Lines In The Esophagus With Preparations Containing Fibrinogen, Cold Insoluble Globulin, Factor Xiii, Antiplasmin, Platelet Growth Factor, Thrombin, And Calcium Chloride. In Experimental Animals Operated On By Standard Methods, Esophageal Leakage Developed In 50% Of The Animals And Death In 40%. By Contrast, In Treated Animals, Esophageal Leak And Death Developed In Only 20%. More Adhesions Were Found In Treated Animals Than In Control Animals.     

A century of progress in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome)

One of the earliest references to heredity in colorectal cancer dates to Aldred Warthin's now-famous recollection of his seamstress' distress regarding cancer excess in her family history. her predication of an early demise secondary to cancer of the female organs, colon, or stomach proved true. The slow, arduous investigation that ensued followed a tortuous route of nearly eight decades before the implications of such family histories were widely acknowledged through the degisnation of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or Lynch Syndrome Variants I and II. The story of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is one of chance meetings, the selfless sharing of information, perseverance in the face of adversity, meticulous scientific documentation, and ultimate vindication by a scientific process that yielded molecular genetic evidence through the identification of the culprit mutations (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS2, and hMSH6). Our purpose is to provide a brief outline of the course charted by the study of the genetics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. This should be of particular interest to the readers of this Journal as we celebrate 100 years of dedication to the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus through the efforts of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.     

Genome Sequencing of an Extended Series of NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Neonatal Infections in a Nepali Hospital Characterizes the Extent of Community- versus Hospital-Associated Transmission in an Endemic Setting

NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains represent major clinical and infection control challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Determining whether transmission occurs at a gene, plasmid, or bacterial strain level and within hospital and/or the community has implications for monitoring and controlling spread. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is the highest-resolution typing method available for transmission epidemiology. We sequenced carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates from 26 individuals involved in several infection case clusters in a Nepali neonatal unit and 68 other clinical Gram-negative isolates from a similar time frame, using Illumina and PacBio technologies. Within-outbreak chromosomal and closed-plasmid structures were generated and used as data set-specific references. Three temporally separated case clusters were caused by a single NDM K. pneumoniae strain with a conserved set of four plasmids, one being a 304,526-bp plasmid carrying bla_NDM-1. The plasmids contained a large number of antimicrobial/heavy metal resistance and plasmid maintenance genes, which may have explained their persistence. No obvious environmental/human reservoir was found. There was no evidence of transmission of outbreak plasmids to other Gram-negative clinical isolates, although bla_NDM variants were present in other isolates in different genetic contexts. WGS can effectively define complex antimicrobial resistance epidemiology. Wider sampling frames are required to contextualize outbreaks. Infection control may be effective in terminating outbreaks caused by particular strains, even in areas with widespread resistance, although this study could not demonstrate evidence supporting specific interventions. Larger, detailed studies are needed to characterize resistance genes, vectors, and host strains involved in disease, to enable effective intervention.     

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (<1 cm) tubular adenomas with no high-grade dysplasia can have a follow-up evaluation in 5-10 years, whereas people with hyperplastic polyps only should have a 10-year follow-up evaluation, as for average-risk people. There have been recent studies that have reported a significant number of missed cancers by colonoscopy. However, high-quality baseline colonoscopy with excellent patient preparation and adequate withdrawal time should minimize this and reduce clinicians concerns. These guidelines were developed jointly by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society to provide a broader consensus and thereby increase the use of the recommendations by endoscopists. The adoption of these guidelines nationally can have a dramatic impact on shifting available resources from intensive surveillance to screening. It has been shown that the first screening colonoscopy and polypectomy produces the greatest effects on reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps.