Laryngopharyngeal reflux and Helicobacter pylori

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) occurs when gastric contents pass the upper esophageal sphincter, causing symptoms such as hoarseness, sore throat, coughing, excess throat mucus, and globus. The pattern of reflux is different in LPR and gastroesophageal reflux. LPR usually occurs during the daytime in the upright position whereas gastroesophageal reflux disease more often occurs in the supine position at night-time or during sleep. Ambulatory 24-h double pH-probe monitoring is the gold standard diagnostic tool for LPR. Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitor on a long-term basis is the mainstay of treatment. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is found in many sites including laryngeal mucosa and interarytenoid region. In this paper, we aim to present the relationship between LPR and H. pylori and review the current literature.     

May maternal anti-mullerian hormone levels predict adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia?

Background: Prediction of preeclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes with biomarkers has been proposed previously. Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) is a growth factor, which is primarily responsible of the regression of the mullerian duct, but also used to predict ovarian reserve and decreases with age similar to the fertility.

Aim: To evaluate the predictive role of maternal anti-mullerian hormone (mAMH) in adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia.

Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted at current high-risk pregnancy department in a tertiary research hospital and 45 cases with preeclampsia classified as study group and 42 as control group. Data collected and evaluated were; age, body mass index (BMI), marriage duration (MD), gestational weeks (GW), gravidity, parity, mode of delivery, birth weight, newborn Apgar score, newborn gender, maternal complication, perinatal outcome, some laboratory parameters and mAMH. The association between mAMH levels and maternal and fetal outcomes were evaluated.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of age, BMI, MD, gravidity, parity and newborn gender (p?>?0.05). GW, vaginal delivery, birth weight, newborn Apgar score, were statistically significantly lower in preeclamptic patients when compared with non-preeclamptic patients (p?<?0.001). Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were statistically significantly higher in the study group (p?<?0.001). The laboratory values [alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid and fibrinogen) were statistically significantly lower in the control group (p?<?0.001). The mAMH level was significantly lower in the preeclamptic group (p: 0.035). There was no correlation between mAMH levels and demographic and clinical parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.590 and the cut-off value was 0.365?ng/ml with sensitivity of 67.4% and specificity of 47.1% for mAMH. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically insignificance between mAMH and maternal complication and perinatal outcome (p: 0.149).

Conclusion: According to this study, mAMH level was lower in preeclamptic patients than in normal pregnants, and is found to be a discriminative factor with low sensitivity and specificity. There was no relationship between mAMH and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Further randomized controlled studies with more participants are needed to evaluate the accurate effects of mAMH levels on preeclampsia and should increase the power of mAMH levels in predicting the preeclampsia.