奥利司他对肥胖青少年体重和机体组分的影响——随机对照试验

背景：儿童和青少年超重和肥胖正迅速增加。在该人群，单纯行为疗法减肥及维持体重下降的效果有限，但是对药物治疗尚未进行广泛的研究。 目的：确定奥利州他（Orlistat）在青少年体重治疗方面的效果及其安个性。 设计、地点和病例：于美国和加拿大32个中心、539例肥胖青少年（12—16岁；体重指数[body mass index，BMI]在第95百分化之上≥2单位）进行的多ln0、54剧（2000年8月至2002年10月）随机双盲研究。 干预：给予奥利司他（n=357）或安慰剂（n=182）120mg，每口3次，持续1年；加适度低热卡饮食（脂肪占30％）、运动和行为治疗。 主要观察指标：BMI变化；二级指标包括腰围和髋用、体重下降、脂质测量以及机体对口服葡萄糖的血糖和胰岛素反心。 结果：至12周时，两组BMI均有下降；此后，奥利司他组体重维持稳定而安慰剂组则超过基线。研究结束时，奥利司他组BMI下降0．55。而安慰剂组则增加0．31（P=0．001）。与安慰剂组的15．7％相比，奥利司他组26．5％的病例BMI下降≥5％（P=0．005）；BMI下降≥10％者分别为4．5％和13．3％（P=0．002）。在研究结束时，奥利司他组体重增加0．53kg，安慰剂组增加3．14kg（P〈0．001）。双能X线吸收测量娃示，这种差异可用脂肪体再的变化解释。奥利司他组腰围下降，安慰剂组腰围上升（-1．33cm比＋0．12cm；P〈0．05）。奥利司他组发生轻至中度胃肠道不良事件者为9％-50％，安慰剂组为1％～13％。 结论：与安慰剂比较，奥利司他与饮食、运动和行为改善联合可显著改善肥胖青少年体重的治疗。在这个青少年人群，连续使用奥利司他1年并无重要安全问题，尽管奥利司他组胃肠道不良事件较为常见。     

Outpatient Initiation of Insulin: A Nurse Practitioner Protocol

Noninsulin dependent diabetes (type II diabetes) is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Clients can generally be controlled by diet and exercise or a combination of diet, exercise, and oral hypoglycemic agents. When this therapy is not effective in controlling the hyperglycemia, the health care provider must choose to initiate insulin therapy. Outpatient initiation of insulin is an alternative to hospitalization in the type II diabetic client. Clinical guidelines for the initiation of insulin on an outpatient basis and management of the diabetic client are presented.     

Challenges in geriatric oral health research methodology concerning caregivers of cognitively impaired elderly adults

Little is known about oral health care behaviors of community-dwelling, cognitively impaired elderly (CIE) persons. Few studies have been conducted regarding the actual provision of oral care for CIE persons or the attitudes and concerns about oral health among their caregivers. The CIE person's ability to perform self-care decreases over time, and the role of the caregiver in daily oral care becomes increasingly important. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the attitudes toward oral health and identify related concerns among caregivers who care for community-dwelling CIE persons. Caregivers were surveyed by means of a self-administered, mailed questionnaire. To maintain confidentiality, an intermediary was used for recruitment and data collection. Overall, 148 caregivers were invited by an intermediary to participate in the survey; only 21 (14%) consented to participate and returned the questionnaire. This paper discusses some of the numerous methodological challenges identified when an attempt was made to survey caregivers' attitudes toward and barriers to providing oral care for a dependent CIE.