Treatment of refractory adult‐onset pityriasis rubra pilaris with TNF‐alpha antagonists: a case series

Background Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory dermatosis with frequent clinical presentation as erythroderma. Conventional systemic treatment is often unsatisfactory and limited by long‐term toxicity. The use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has been reported previously in single cases, but lacking long‐term follow‐up or comparison between different biological agents. Objectives To assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of TNF‐alpha antagonist, infliximab and etanercept, either in monotherapy or in combination therapy of severe, refractory adult‐onset PRP. Methods Seven patients of adult‐onset PRP, six newly diagnosed type‐I and 1 type‐II, which were resistant or ineligible to conventional systemic treatment, received a single course of infliximab or etanercept therapy, alone or in combination with low‐dose acitretin (>0.25 mg/kg/daily). After complete remission and treatment discontinuation, a follow‐up period of 12 months was evaluated for relapses. Results Six patients obtained complete remission after a single course of anti‐TNF‐alpha therapy: mean therapy duration was 19.3 weeks (range 6–48 weeks). All patients obtained significant clearing (>75% of body surface area) of skin lesions at week 12. Two patients with marked keratoderma developed localized disease recurrence during treatment. During follow‐up, only a single patient, affected by type II PRP, had disease relapse. Conclusions Both TNF‐alpha antagonists proved successful for the treatment of refractory, adult‐onset PRP, yielding complete and persistent clinical responses in type‐I PRP. Infliximab was associated with a more rapid onset of action, while treatment duration was comparable with etanercept. PRP type II warranted long‐term therapy and showed relapse after drug discontinuation.     

Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 p24 antigen in U.S. blood donors--an assessment of the efficacy of testing in donor screening. The HIV-Antigen Study Group

BACKGROUND. We performed a multicenter study in 1989 to determine whether screening whole-blood donors for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) p24 antigen would improve transfusion safety by identifying carriers of the virus who are seronegative for HIV-1 antibody. METHODS. More than 500,000 donations were tested at 13 U.S. blood centers with test kits from two manufacturers. Units found repeatedly reactive were retested in a central laboratory; if the results were positive, they were confirmed by a neutralization assay. A subgroup of units was also tested for HIV-1 by the polymerase chain reaction. Selected donors confirmed or not confirmed as having p24 antigen were contacted for follow-up interviews to identify risk factors and undergo retesting for HIV-1 markers. RESULTS. Positive tests for p24 antigen were confirmed by neutralization in five donors (0.001 percent of all donations tested), all of whom were also positive for HIV-1 antibody and HIV-1 by polymerase chain reaction. Three of the antigen-positive donors had other markers of infectious disease that would have resulted in the exclusion of their blood; two had risk factors for HIV-1 that should have led to self-exclusion. Of 220 blood units with repeatedly reactive p24 antigen whose presence could not be confirmed by neutralization (0.04 percent of the donations studied), none were positive for HIV-1 antibody, HIV-1 by polymerase chain reaction (120 units tested), or virus culture (76 units tested)--attesting to the specificity of confirmatory neutralization. CONCLUSIONS. The finding that no donation studied was positive for p24 antigen and negative for HIV-1 antibody suggests that screening donors for p24 antigen with tests of the current level of sensitivity would not add substantially to the safety of the U.S. blood supply.     

Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy of Vasculostatin (Vstat120) Expressing Oncolytic HSV-1

Oncolytic viral (OV) therapy is a promising therapeutic modality for brain tumors. Vasculostatin (Vstat120) is the cleaved and secreted extracellular fragment of brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1), a brain-specific receptor. To date, the therapeutic efficacy of Vstat120 delivery into established tumors has not been investigated. Here we tested the therapeutic efficacy of combining Vstat120 gene delivery in conjunction with OV therapy. We constructed RAMBO (Rapid Antiangiogenesis Mediated By Oncolytic virus), which expresses Vstat120 under the control of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) IE4/5 promoter. Secreted Vstat120 was detected as soon as 4 hours postinfection in vitro and was retained for up to 13 days after OV therapy in subcutaneous tumors. RAMBO-produced Vstat120 efficiently inhibited endothelial cell migration and tube formation in vitro (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0184, respectively) and inhibited angiogenesis (P = 0.007) in vivo. There was a significant suppression of intracranial and subcutaneous glioma growth in mice treated with RAMBO compared to the control virus, HSVQ (P = 0.0021 and P < 0.05, respectively). Statistically significant reduction in tumor vascular volume fraction (VVF) and microvessel density (MVD) was observed in tumors treated with RAMBO. This is the first study to report the antitumor effects of Vstat120 delivery into established tumors and supports the further development of RAMBO as a possible cancer therapy.     

IDEAL PAIN RELIEF FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

In a previous report the effectiveness of intraperitoneal bupivacaine in reducing pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy was demonstrated. Other methods of pain relief are commonly used but none has been compared following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In two further studies we have compared the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine against wound infiltration with bupivacaine, and against intraperitoneal bupivacaine with the addition of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Two consecutive studies were performed. In the first, patients in group 1 were given 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine into the peritoneal cavity; patients in group 2 were given 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected into the trocar wounds. In the second study, patients in group 1 were given 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine into the peritoneal cavity; patients in group 2 were given 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine into the peritoneal cavity and a diclofenac suppository (100 mg) one hour before surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed with a visual analogue pain scale. There was no difference in pain scores in the two groups in either study. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine is as effective as wound infiltration. The addition of an NSAID makes no difference in the reduction of postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Ecstasy cannot be assumed to be 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDMA)

LINKED ARTICLES

This is a rebuttal by the authors (Green et al., pp. 1523–1536 of this issue) to a commentary by Parrott, pp. 1518–1520 of this issue. To view the article by Green et al. visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01819.x. To view the commentary by Parrott visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01941.xWe thank Prof Parrott (Parrott 2012) for his interest in our review (Green et al., 2012). Our main aim was to discuss the problems that arise in interpreting data obtained when administering 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) to experimental animals in terms of possible clinical consequences and vice versa, not to disparage the evidence that Ecstasy is neurotoxic in humans. We presented evidence that the pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and primates are fundamentally different from the pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans. Because the plasma half-life of the drug in rats is 10 times shorter than in humans, the acute adverse events in rats may be minimal compared with those in humans, and this includes body temperature and endocrine changes. Conversely, the rapid metabolism of the drug in rats to form neurotoxic metabolites may result in more severe long-term effects in that species than those that may occur in humans.We had no intention of suggesting that there was no evidence for some recreational Ecstasy users presenting with evidence of 5-HT neurotoxicity, albeit it is clear from the literature that some of this evidence remains open to several interpretations. What we did claim was that pure 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) taken alone was unlikely to cause 5-HT neurotoxicity in man. Here we must emphasize the term MDMA, as it is crucial to our discussion. Parrott, in contrast, uses the term ‘Ecstasy/MDMA’ several times when discussing neurotoxicity (Parrott, 2012). This association of Ecstasy with MDMA is one of the major problems of translation that we addressed. The Ecstasy tablet that most recreational users buy and ingest is not necessarily MDMA. Indeed, in many cases, it clearly is not. The tablet is often adulterated with other compounds, and one investigation identified no less than 14 substances other than MDMA in Ecstasy tablets, which users nevertheless presumably believed contained only MDMA (Vogels et al., 2009). Many of the adulterants identified were also psychoactive and included compounds structurally related to MDMA such as 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine and 2-methylamino-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)butane, which have poorly researched pharmacology and toxicology. In addition, most recreational users of Ecstasy also knowingly ingest other psychoactive compounds such as alcohol and cannabis. Alcohol, for example, alters the pharmacokinetics of MDMA (Hamida et al., 2009). While, as Parrott states, clinical studies have attempted to allow for these confounding factors in any examination of the physical and psychological effects of MDMA in humans, such analysis is always limited not only by the other compounds the evaluators are unaware of, but also drugs perhaps not even considered to be relevant by the user and therefore not disclosed. It is unlikely that coffee and ‘energy drinks’ such as Red Bull are always disclosed, but there is now good preclinical evidence that caffeine, which incidentally has also been found as an adulterant in Ecstasy tablets, enhances both the hyperthermia and neurotoxicity induced in rats by MDMA (Camarasa et al., 2006; Vanattou-Saïfoudine et al., 2010). And this brings us to the crux of the problem and weakness of all the clinical data cited by Parrott (2012). A basic tenet of all good clinical pharmacology is accurate knowledge of the doses administered, frequency of administration and any confounding factors such as other drugs being consumed. None of these data are available with any precision in the clinical studies quoted. Of course one has some indication as to dose (although as Vogels et al., (2009) reported, the dose contained in illicitly obtained tablets is highly variable) and frequency of drug ingestion, but this information is generally obtained from the user whose recall is likely to be limited or who decides to obfuscate. Crucially, the information can never take into account the problem of drug tablet adulteration. The fact that hair or urine samples detect MDMA merely shows the user has consumed the drug, not how much or when or what other drugs were taken concurrently.We never suggested that MDMA exposure was not going to be associated with physical or psychological change. However such changes are not necessarily associated with long-term neurotoxic damage. We have shown that long-term behavioural effects can occur in rats both with and without 5-HT neurotoxicity (Fone et al., 2002; Bull et al., 2003; Rodsiri et al., 2011). It is interesting that Parrott approvingly quotes the Verheyden et al. (2003) study in support of his contention that neurotoxic damage has occurred. Because this study noted that the majority of persons reporting chronic psychiatric problems reported ‘improved mental health’ after quitting the drug, this surely allows us to conclude that the drug had produced subacute changes rather than any that could be associated with long-term neurotoxic damage.A further limitation to any clinical study is that one cannot perform prospective studies with the aim of investigating whether long-term neurotoxic events occur, so weaknesses arise with regard to any psychological abnormalities observed. Are persons with high risk of psychiatric problems more likely to misuse the drug, or does the drug induce changes in high-risk individuals? If high risk also happened to be associated with 5-HT abnormalities in the brains, then any conclusion that MDMA has induced neurotoxicity is spurious.We most certainly did not suggest that MDMA acted as a neurotoxin only under conditions of severe hyperthermia as is stated by Parrot in his sixth paragraph (Parrott, 2012). We have been involved in many studies on the effects of MDMA on body temperature in rats (see Docherty and Green, 2010) including one that demonstrated that neurotoxicity can occur in the absence of hyperthermia (O''Shea et al., 1998) and another that showed that hyperthermia worsens neurotoxic damage (Green et al., 2004). In our review, what we did propose was that because of the very different pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and humans, it is probable that humans would suffer serious or fatal adverse events at plasma levels below those likely to be required to induce 5-HT neurotoxicity.We emphasize again that we are not denying the clinical observations reviewed by Parrott, but conclude that the effects seen cannot be ascribed solely to the effects of MDMA, as he seems to be proposing. We also repeat our contention that MDMA in combination with other drugs may induce neurotoxicity and this could be said to be supported by the clinical studies quoted by Parrott.Finally, we can but assume that Parrott concurs with our principal conclusion that ‘the doses currently being used to investigate the possible therapeutic benefits of MDMA are unlikely to produce any severe acute or importantly any long-term neurotoxic damage in the human brain’ as he used such a dose (100 mg or approximately 1.4 mg·kg ⁻¹) in one of his recent studies in human volunteers (Parrott et al., 2011).     

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves angiogenesis and bone formation in critical sized diaphyseal defects

Besides the use of autologous bone grafting several osteoconductive and osteoinductive methods have been reported to improve bone healing. However, persistent non‐union occurs in a considerable number of cases and compromised angiogenesis is suspected to impede bone regeneration. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) improves angiogenesis. This study evaluates the effects of HBO on bone defects treated with autologous bone grafting in a bone defect model in rabbits. Twenty‐four New‐Zealand White Rabbits were subjected to a unilateral critical sized diaphyseal radius bone defect and treated with autologous cancellous bone transplantation. The study groups were exposed to an additional HBO treatment regimen. Bone regeneration was evaluated radiologically and histologically at 3 and 6 weeks, angiogenesis was assessed by immunohistochemistry at three and six weeks. The additional administration of HBO resulted in a significantly increased new bone formation and angiogenesis compared to the sole treatment with autologous bone grafting. These results were apparent after three and six weeks of treatment. The addition of HBO therapy to autologous bone grafts leads to significantly improved bone regeneration. The increase in angiogenesis observed could play a crucial role for the results observed. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:513–520, 2015.