Is colonic electrical activity a similar phenomena to small-bowel electrical activity?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate colonic spike bursts regarding 1) their migration behavior, 2) their pressure correlates, and 3) comparing colonic short spike bursts with spike bursts from migrating myoelectric complex from the small bowel. METHODS: Rectosigmoid electromyography and manometry were recorded simultaneously in seven normal volunteers and electromyography alone in five others during two hours of fasting and for two hours after one 2,100-kJ meal. One patient with an ileostomy was also studied by the same method to record the migrating myoelectric complex from the terminal ileum during fasting. RESULTS: Three kinds of spike bursts were observed in the pelvic colon: rhythmic short spike bursts, migrating long spike bursts, and nonmigrating long spike bursts. The meal significantly increased the number of migrating and nonmigrating long spike bursts (from 25 to 38.7 percent of the recording time; P <0.01). These bursts of potentials showed a peak 15 minutes after the meal, which may be caused by the gastrocolic reflex. Migrating long spike bursts started anywhere along the rectosigmoid and migrated from there aborad 82 percent of the time and orad or in both directions in 10 or 7 percent of the time, respectively. They originated pressure waves 99 percent of the time. Short spike bursts were more frequent before the meal (15.1 percent before and 9.6 percent after the meal), but the difference was not significant; they neither propagated nor initiated pressure waves detected by the miniballoon. CONCLUSIONS: Migrating long spike bursts were the only potentials that migrated, sometimes for short distances. Short spike bursts are a different phenomenon from the small-bowel migrating myoelectric complex because they do not migrate; they can occur during the postprandial period and never originated intraluminal pressure waves.Supported by a grant from the Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica, Proc. DBI-22086.Presented at the meeting of the Portuguese Congress of Gastrenterology, Vila Moura, Portugal, June 2 to 5, 1993.     

Experiments on the nature of the signal that induces spinal neuroplastic changes following a peripheral lesion.

This study aimed at identifying the signal(s) that elicit myositis-induced neuroplastic changes in background activity and responsiveness of spinal neurones. It is based on previous data suggesting that in dorsal horn neurones, responsiveness to peripheral input on one hand and background activity on the other are probably controlled by different mechanisms. In anaesthetized rats, myositis was induced in the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle and the activity of single dorsal horn neurones was recorded in segment L3. Impulse traffic and axoplasmatic transport in dorsal roots L4 and L5 were selectively blocked by lignocaine or vinblastine for various time periods relative to the induction of the myositis. The results show that the main triggering signal for the myositis-induced changes in both responsiveness and background activity is the altered impulse activity in primary afferent fibres. In contrast, 'no axonally transported chemical signal controlling the discharge behaviour of dorsal horn neurones was found. However, the time course of the electrical signals that cause the myositis-induced changes in background activity and responsiveness is different. For changes in responsiveness, a rather narrow time window of 2 h directly after induction of the myositis existed, during which the impulses from the inflamed muscle must reach the spinal cord. Accordingly, to prevent the increase in responsiveness, the electrical input had to be blocked during the first 2 h; a block of the same duration at another time had no effect. The change in background activity seems to be due to a continuous input from the inflamed muscle which adds up over the hours. Therefore, with regard to background activity, blocking the electrical signals is effective at any time, but only a block of long duration has a significant effect.     

A clinical trial on the prevention of catheter-related sepsis using a new hub model.

BACKGROUND: Catheter hub contamination is being increasingly recognized as a source of catheter-related sepsis. The authors have investigated the efficacy of a new hub design in preventing endoluminal catheter contamination and catheter-related sepsis arising at the hub. METHODS: Adult surgical and intensive care patients requiring a subclavian catheter for at least 1 week were randomly assigned to receive catheters with standard connectors (control group, n=73) or equipped with a new hub model (new hub group, n=78). Skin, catheter tip, and hub cultures were performed at the time the catheter was withdrawn because therapy was terminated or because of suspicion of sepsis, in which case peripheral blood cultures were taken. RESULTS: Of the 151 patients included, 15 (10%) developed catheter-related sepsis. Catheters were more often withdrawn because suspicion of infection in the control group (42 vs. 19%, p<0.005). Catheter sepsis rate was higher in the control group (16 vs. 4%, p<0.01) because of the low rate of catheter sepsis arising at the hub observed in the new hub group (1 vs. 11%, p<0.01). The prevalence of culture-positive catheter hubs without associated bacteremia (colonization) was higher in the control group (18 vs. 5%, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A new catheter hub has proved to be useful in preventing endoluminal bacterial colonization and catheter-related sepsis in subclavian lines inserted for a mean of 2 weeks.