Interactions Between Transvenous Nonthoracotomy Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems and Permanent Transvenous Endocardial Pacemakers

Limited information is available regardIng potential adverse Interactions between transvenous nonthoracotomy cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers. We describe our experience with 37 patients who have undergone successful Implantation of both a transvenous defibrillator and pacemaker. The patients’mean age was 64 ± 12,9 years. Thirty-three were male and four were female. The mean LVEF wos 30.8%±11.8%, The indications for pacemaker implantation included sick sinus syndrome in 13 patients, complete heart block in 15 patients, sinus brady-cardia secondary to medications In 8 patients, and neurocardlogenlc syncope In 1 patient. The Indications for Insertion of a defibrillator Included medically refractory VT in 27 patients and sudden cardiac death in 10 patients. Twenty-three patients received an Endotak lead and 14 patients received o Transvene lead. Eighteen patients had a pacemaker prior to an ICD, 14 patients had an ICD prior to a pacemaker, and 4 patients had both devices placed simultaneously. Interaction was evaluated at Implant of the second device and 1–3 days after both devices were placed. Detection of VF/VT was analyzed during asynchronous pacing (DOO/VOO) with maximum pacing output. In addition, in six patients, DFT was determined before and after pacemaker implantation. In 14 patients (38%), device interactions that could not always be optimally corrected were observed. In five patients, the pacemaker was reset to the “noise reversion” mode after high energy ICD discharge, Oversensing of atrial pacemaker stimuli resulted in inappropriate ICD firings in four patients. This wos observed only with a specific device ond could not be prevented by atriol leod repositioning in two of them, but required reprogramming of the pacemaker to the VVImode. An increase in DFT was observed in five patients who had a pacemaker implanted after on ICD. Compared with previously published studies, a greater frequency of tronsvenous ICD and pacemaker Interactions were observed. Considering that almost 50% of the patients already have o pacemaker ot the time of ICD Implant, the ovalloblllty of deflbrlllotors with dual chamber pocing capability will not eliminate the potential for this problem.     

Atrioventricular Interval Optimization in the Right Atrial Appendage and Interatrial Septum Pacing: A Comparison Between Echo and Peak Endocardial Acceleration Measurements

PADELETTI, et al. : Atrioventricular Interval Optimization in the Right Atrial Appendage and Interatrial Septum Pacing: A Comparison Between ECHC and Peak Endocardial Acceleration. Interatrial septum pacing (IASP) reduces interatrial conduction time and consequently may interfere with atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization. We studied 14 patients with an implanted BEST Living system device able to measure peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) signal. The aims of our study were to compare the (1) optimal AVD (OAVD) in right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP) and IASP, and (2) OAVD derived by the PEA signal versus OAVD derived by Echo/Doppler evaluation of the left ventricular filling time (LVFT) and cardiac output (CO). Measurements were performed in DDD VDD modes Eight patients (group A) had RAAP and six patients (group B) had IASP. In group A, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 185 ± 23 ms , 177 ± 19 ms , and 192 ± 23 ms in DDD and 147 ± 19 ms , 135 ± 27 ms , and 146 ± 20 ms in VDD, respectively. OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was significantly longer in DDD mode than in VDD (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001 ). In group B, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 116 ± 19 ms , 113 ± 10 ms , and 130 ± 30ms in DDD and 106 ± 16 ms , 96 ± 15 ms , and 108 ± 26 ms in VDD, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between DDD and VDD. Significant correlations between OAVDs PEA derived and OAVDs LVFT and CO derived were observed (r = 0.71, r = 0.69, respectively ). When new techniques of atrial stimulation, as IASP, are used an OAVD shorter and similar in VDD and DDD has to be considered. The BEST Living system could provide a valid method to ensure, in every moment, the exact required OAVD to maximize atrial contribution to CO.     

Age-related differences in cognition: Lifestyle, health status, coping and sociodemographic factors

This study examines to what extent memory capacity is Influencedby lifestyle, health or sociodemographic factors. The data werederived from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS), a large studycarried out in The Netherlands. For the current study 1,673people aged 24–88 years completed a postal survey on ‘Health,Cognition, and Psychosocial factors’. The dependent variablewas ‘memory capacity’ as measured by the Metamemoryin Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire. The study shows that age,gender and coping abilities play an important role in influencingthe variation in memory capacity. The lifestyle factors of smokingand mental activity also had a significant effect on memorycapacity in certain age-specific subgroups. These results suggeststhat future research should focus on these variables as determinantsof cognitive ageing.