Eosinophilic granuloma of the bone: Ultrasonographic imaging

Eosinophilic granuloma is a rare disease of unknown aetiology that affects the bones. Two cases of eosinophilic granuloma are presented. Ultrasonographic, CT and histopathological findings are described. Ultrasonographic‐guided core‐needle biopsy was performed. Treatment was initiated by installing steroid suspension into the lesions, which resulted in complete healing of the bone in both cases.     

Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty

Sixty-five total knee arthroplasties were evaluated by the Knee Society Radiological Evaluation System which was developed to encourage uniform reporting of the results of total knee arthroplasty. All patients were examined by three independent experienced radiologists 8.9 years after surgery (range, 3-16 years) to analyze the interobserver variability. For measurement of angles, high interobserver correlation was calculated for the prosthetic component angles and the femorotibial shaft angle. The comparison of the means indicated no significant differences except for the femorotibial shaft angle. For measurement of radiolucent lines, interobserver correlation was low for all components. The differences of the means were significantly different for all components. The results of interobserver variability of the patellar evaluation revealed high interobserver correlation for the patellar angle and for patellar subluxation and dislocation evaluation. For assessment of patellar mediolateral and superoinferior displacement, a low interobserver correlation was found. For radiographic assessment of total knee arthroplasty, the measurement of angles, including alpha, beta, femorotibial shaft angle, sagittal femoral and tibial component angle, patellar angle, and patellar subluxation and dislocation evaluation are recommended. The method of assessing radiolucent lines should be reconsidered.     

Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in general surgical patients under different conditions of anaesthesia

The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil were studied in 56 surgical patients after an intravenous bolus of 2 μg kg^-1, in association with neurolept analgesia or volatile anaesthetics (halothane, enflurane and isoflurane). Plasma concentrations of sufentanil were measured by radioimmunoassay. The kinetics of sufentanil were comparable under neurolept analgesia and under anaesthesia with halothane, enflurane or isoflurane. The overall mean elimination half-life was 182 min, Vd⁸⁵ 169 1 and the plasma clearance 910 ml min^-1. Except for the isoflurane subgroup, there was no significant correlation between half-life, the volume of distribution or clearance with age (24–77 years) or body weight (45–95 kg).     

Assessment of gestational age: a simplified scoring system

Because of the disadvantages of the Dubowitz score in very ill preterms, an alternative score based on 7 morphological items was designed, and the results are compared to those of the Dubowitz score in 229 newborns. This scoring system proved to be reliable and easy to perform; standard deviation was +/- 10.2 days versus 9.7 days for the Dubowitz score.     

Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias

In some clinical trials, treatment allocation on a patient level is not feasible, and whole groups or clusters of patients are allocated to the same treatment. If, for example, a clinical trial is investigating the efficacy of various patient coaching methods and randomization is done on a patient level, then patients who are receiving different methods may come into contact with each other and influence each other. This would create contamination of the treatment effects. Such bias might be prevented by randomization on the coaches level. The patients of a coach constitute a cluster and all the subjects in that cluster receive the same treatment. Disadvantages of this approach may be reduced statistical efficiency and recruitment bias, as the treatment that a subject will receive is known in advance. Pseudo cluster randomization avoids this, because in pseudo cluster randomization, not everybody in a certain cluster receives the same treatment, just the majority. There are two groups of clusters: in one group the majority of subjects receive treatment A, while a limited number receive treatment B. In the other group of clusters the proportions are reversed. The statistical properties of this method are described. When contamination is present, the method appears to be more efficient than randomization on a patient level or on a cluster level.