Interaction of Heparin With Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APA) From the Sera of Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)

PROBLEM: To determine if heparin may act directly with antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHOD: Patients were seen at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Twenty women with a history of RPL (≥3 miscarriages), positive APA, and an otherwise normal evaluation were treated with heparin in two daily subcutaneous dosages during a successful pregnancy. APA levels were obtained prior to conception and again at 6, 20, and 30 weeks. RESULTS: Heparin reduced APA binding to cardiolipin and phosphatidylserine in a dose-dependent fashion in ELISA. Heparin affinity chromatography absorbed over 80% of the IgG anticardiolipin antibody in serum from women with high levels of APA. Women treated with increasing dosages of heparin during pregnancy had inversely decreasing levels of IgG anticardiolipin antibody. CONCLUSION: Heparin may act by directly binding APA in vivo, thereby decreasing the adverse effects of APA in women with APA associated RPL.     

Is there a place for gastroenterostomy in patients with advanced cancer of the head of the pancreas?

There remains doubt about the need for gastroenterostomy in patients with advanced cancer of the pancreatic head, performed either prophylactically or when passage of food becomes impossible. The records of 142 patients admitted for advanced pancreatic cancer to the Erasmus University Hospital over a period of 11 years were reviewed. We concentrated especially on the pre- and postoperative intake of food in cases involving gastroenterostomy and the morbidity and mortality associated with abdominal surgery in these patients. Of 129 patients without symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction at the time of diagnosis, 31 underwent prophylactic gastroenterostomy. The procedure did not prevent gastric outlet obstruction in 4 patients. Of the remaining 98 patients, 15 developed gastric outlet obstruction. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the interval to the occurrence of a symptomatic obstruction between these two groups, taking into account other covariables. Postoperative complications and mortality regarding a gastroenterostomy were high, ranging from 9% to 41% and 11% to 33%, respectively. Our results do not indicate that prophylactic gastroenterostomy may significantly prevent future gastric outlet obstruction; therefore, as it also increases morbidity, it should not be performed. A gastroenterostomy to relieve symptoms should be considered carefully, as the success rate is low and is accompanied by a considerable incidence of morbidity and mortality.

---

Resumen Persiste la duda sobre la necesidad de practicar gastroenterostomía en pacientes con cáncer avanzado de la cabeza del páncreas, así sea profiláctica o en presencia de obstrucción al paso de los alimentos. Se revisaron las historias de 142 pacientes con cáncer avanzado de la cabeza del páncreas en el Hospital de la Universidad de Erasmo observados en un periodo de 11 años. El estudio se concentré especialmente sobre la ingesta pre y postoperatoria de alimentos en los pacientos con gastroenterostomía y en la morbilidad y mortalidad asociada con la cirugía abdominal. De 129 pacientes libres de síntomas de obstrucción en el momento del diagnóstico, 31 fueron sometidos a gastroenterostomía profiláctica; el procedimiento no logró prevenir la obstrucción gástrica en 4 casos. De los 98 pacientes restantes, 15 desarrollaron obstrucción gástrico. El análisis proporcional de Cox no demostró diferencia significativa en el intervalo transcurrido hasta la aparición de los sintomas entre los dos grupos, tomando en consideración diversas variables. Las tasas de complicaciones y de mortalidad postoperatoria en relación con la gastroenterostomía fueron elevadas, 9–41% y 11–33%, respectivamente. Nuestros resultados no indican que la gastroenterostomía profiláctica pueda prevenir la obstrucción gástrica y, por cuanto incrementa la morbilidad, no debe ser realizada. La gastroenterostomía por razones de sintomatologia debe ser cuidadosamente considerada, puesto que la tasa de éxito es baja y se acompana de considerable morbilidad y mortalidad.

---

Résumé Réaliser une gastroentérostomie de faÇon prophylactique ou seulement lorsque l'alimentation devient impossible chez un patient ayant un cancer de la tÊte du pancréas reste une question sans réponse. Les dossiers de 142 patients ayant un cancer avancé de la tÊte du pancréas, observés à l'HÔpital Universitaire Erasmus en l'espace de 11 ans, ont été revus. Nous avons noté la possibilité d'alimentation en périodes préet postopératoire ainsi que la morbidité et mortalité en rapport avec la chirurgie chez ces patients. Des 129 patients n'ayant pas de symptÔmes d'obstruction postpylorique au moment du diagnostic, 31 ont eu une gastroentérostomie à titre prophylactique. Cette intervention n'a pu prévenir l'obstruction chez 4 de ces patients. Des 98 autres patients, 15 ont développé une obstruction postpylorique. Une analyse multifactorielle selon le modèle de Cox n'a pu démontrer de différence significative entre les deux groupes pour l'intervalle entre le moment du diagnostic et la survenue de l'obstruction. Le taux de complications et de décès postopératoires après gastroentérostomie était élevée, variant respectivement entre 9% et 41% et 11% et 33%. Nos résultats indiquent que la gastroentérostomie à titre prophylactique ne prévient pas la survenue d'une obstruction postpylorique mais qu'elle accroÎt la morbidité. Dans ces conditions, la gastroentérostomie ne devrait Être réalisée qu'en cas d'obstruction symptomatique, mais en sachant qu'elle n'est pas toujours couronnée de succès et que les taux de mortalité et de morbidité ne sont pas nuls.

     

Ethanol Feeding Causes Inactivation of Both State 1 and State 2 Rat Hepatic Asialoglycoprotein Receptors

Previous studies have shown that ethanol feeding in rats causes inactivation and redistribution of ˜50% of the total asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGPRs) in hepatocytes (Tworek et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271:2531, 1996), and that two equal populations of hepatic ASGPRs mediate ligand uptake and processing via two functionally different pathways (Weigel in Glycoconjugates: Composition, Structure and Function , Marcel Dekker, 1992, p. 421). The purpose of this study was to determine if ethanol feeding causes preferential inactivation of only one of these two ASGPR populations, which have been designated state 1 and state 2 ASGPRs. The state 2, but not state 1, ASGPRs are inactivated in isolated hepatocytes by a variety of drugs and inhibitors. State 2 ASGPRs can also be inactivated in permeable cells by ATP treatment and then reactivated by treatment with fatty acyl coenzyme As. In the present study, permeable cell assays for state 2 ASGPR inactivation and reactivation were used to assess whether hepatocytes from ethanol-fed rats contain inactive state 2 ASGPRs. The results show that preferential inactivation of one ASGPR population does not occur after ethanol feeding. That inactive ASGPRs could not be reactivated by treatment with palmitoyl-coenzyme A to a greater extent in ethanol-fed versus control cells indicates there is not a larger pool of inactivated state 2 ASGPRs in treated cells. We conclude that ethanol feeding causes equal inactivation of both state 1 and state 2 ASGPRs. Ethanol feeding may represent the first treatment found to inactivate state 1 ASGPRs.     

Analysis of Implantation in Assisted Reproduction Through the Use of Serial Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Measurements

Purpose: Our purpose was to examine implantation of singleton pregnancies achieved following various assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) through the appearance and rising titers of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. Methods: A total of 114 singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination was analyzed. Patients were divided into five groups according to the type of ovarian stimulation protocol [gonadotropin stimulation with/without the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), long protocol, or flare-up technique] and to the day of embryo transfer (day 2 or day 3 after oocyte retrieval). Serial serum hCG levels were measured between 10 and 25 days after fertilization and log-transformed. Linear regression analyses were performed and extrapolated to hCG = 10 mIU/ml (hCG ₁₀ ), which was used as an estimate of detectable implantation. The slopes of the regression lines were used to estimate the rising speed of hCG. Results: There were no significant differences in the days of hCG in maternal serum to reach 10 mIU/ml (implantation) or in the slopes of the regression lines for all five studied groups. Conclusions: The appearance of hCG in maternal serum was used to assess the time of clinically detectable implantation. Furthermore, because hCG production is a marker of trophoblastic activity, its serum doubling time was used as an indicator of embryo quality. Results showed that in various ART protocols with and without GnRHa, there were no significant differences in implantation time or embryo quality. Embryo development in early pregnancy follows a preprogrammed-timing schedule and depends mainly on the embryonic age of the health, successfully implanted conceptus.