The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision

OBJECTIVES: Examine the cause of local recurrence (LR) and patient survival (S) following abdominoperineal resection (APR) and anterior resection (AR) for rectal carcinoma and the effect of introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) on APR. METHODS: A total of 608 patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer in Leeds from 1986 to 1997. CRM status and follow-up data of local recurrence and patient survival were available for 561 patients, of whom 190 underwent APR (32.4%) and 371 AR (63.3%). Also, a retrospective study of pathologic images of 93 specimens of rectal carcinoma. RESULTS: Patients undergoing APR had a higher LR and lower survival (LR, 22.3% versus 13.5%, P = 0.002; S, 52.3% versus 65.8%, P = 0.003) than AR. LR free rates were lower in the APR group and cancer specific survival was lowered (LR, 66% versus 77%, log rank P = 0.03; S, 48% versus 59%, log rank P = 0.02). Morphometry: total area of surgically removed tissue outside the muscularis propria was smaller in APR specimens (n = 27) than AR specimens (n = 66) (P < 0.0001). Linear dimensions of transverse slices of tissue containing tumor, median posterior, and lateral measurements were smaller (P < 0.05) in the APR than the AR group. APR specimens with histologically positive CRM (n = 11) had a smaller area of tissue outside the muscularis propria (P = 0.04) compared with the CRM-negative APR specimens (n = 16). Incidence of CRM involvement in the APR group (41%) was higher than in the AR group (12%) (P = 0.006) in the 1997 to 2000 cohort. Similar results (36% and 22%) were found in the 1986 to 1997 cohort (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated by APR have a higher rate of CRM involvement, a higher LR, and poorer prognosis than AR. The frequency of CRM involvement for APR has not diminished with TME. CRM involvement in the APR specimens is related to the removal of less tissue at the level of the tumor in an APR. Where possible, a more radical operation should be considered for all low rectal cancer tumors.     

Total enteral nutrition versus total parenteral nutrition after major torso injury: attenuation of hepatic protein reprioritization

Reprioritization of hepatic protein synthesis, a process involving accelerated production of acute-phase proteins at the expense of constitutive proteins, accompanies major trauma. The impact of isocaloric, isonitrogenous total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on hepatic reprioritization was investigated in a prospective, randomized trial. Of the 59 patients with an abdominal trauma index (ATI) greater than 15 but not more than 40, 45 evaluable patients were followed. Results from 36 (18 TEN, 18 TPN) evaluable patients revealed that mean serum levels of acute-phase proteins increased, whereas mean serum levels increased to a greater extent in the TPN group. The maximal increase from baseline for the acute-phase response in both groups occurred at postinjury day 5 and was significantly higher for alpha 1-antitrypsin (alpha 1AT, p = 0.03) and orosomucoid (p = 0.02) in the TPN group. Nonacute-phase proteins reached a nadir at day 10 in the TPN group and increased in the TEN group; significant differences between TEN and TPN groups appeared for albumin (p = 0.004) and retinol-binding protein (RBP, p = 0.03); alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2M) approached significance at day 10 (p = 0.07). When change from baseline values was compared, day 10 increases in alpha 2M were significantly higher (p = 0.04) in the TEN group. These data suggest that postinjury TEN attenuates reprioritization of hepatic protein synthesis in patients sustaining major trauma.     

Neuropsychological Deficits in Alcoholics: Facts and Fancies

Five facts and complementary “fancies” have been examined. Brain damage is found in alcoholics but whether alcohol directly causes the damage is not clear at this time. Cortical and subcortical atrophy is found in 50%-70% of unselected alcoholics coming for treatment but a substantial minority of alcoholics do not have such changes. Brain changes in alcoholics are associated significantly with neuropsychological deficits but the magnitude of the correlations leaves much of the variance unexplained. Neuropsychological deficits in alcoholics (who do not have “mental deterioration”) are relatively specific and in most instances functions can be recovered but there are some suggestions of more permanent, if limited, deficits. While specific neuropsychological deficits in alcoholics have been recurrently established, their relationship to therapeutic strategies and therapeutic outcome remains to be explored. Finally, it is abundantly clear that implicit and explicit criteria for patient selection in neuropsychological studies are major, if not critical, variables in work in this field.