Evaluating Components of Dental Utilization among Adults with Diabetes and Matched Controls via Hurdle Models

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: About one-third of adults with diabetes have severe oral complications. However, limited previous research has investigated dental care utilization associated with diabetes. This project had two purposes: to develop a methodology to estimate dental utilization using claims data and to use this methodology to compare utilization of dental care between adults with and without diabetes. METHODS: Data included secondary enrollment and demographic data from Washington Dental Service (WDS) and Group Health Cooperative (GH), clinical data from GH, and dental-utilization data from WDS claims during 2002-2006. Dental and medical records from WDS and GH were linked for enrolees continuously and dually insured during the study. We employed hurdle models in a quasi-experimental setting to assess differences between adults with and without diabetes in 5-year cumulative utilization of dental services. Propensity score matching adjusted for differences in baseline covariates between the two groups. RESULTS: We found that adults with diabetes had lower odds of visiting a dentist (OR=0.74, p < 0.001). Among those with a dental visit, diabetes patients had lower odds of receiving prophylaxes (OR=0.77), fillings (OR=0.80) and crowns (OR=0.84) (p < 0.005 for all) and higher odds of receiving periodontal maintenance (OR=1.24), non-surgical periodontal procedures (OR=1.30), extractions (OR=1.38) and removable prosthetics (OR=1.36) (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes are less likely to use dental services. Those who do are less likely to use preventive care and more likely to receive periodontal care and tooth-extractions. Future research should address the possible effectiveness of additional prevention in reducing subsequent severe oral disease in patients with diabetes.     

Experience developing national evidence-based clinical guidelines for childhood pneumonia in a low-income setting - making the GRADE?

Background  

The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines has gained wide acceptance in high-income countries and reputable international organizations. Whereas this approach may be a desirable standard, challenges remain in low-income settings with limited capacity and resources for evidence synthesis and guideline development. We present our experience using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for the recent revision of the Kenyan pediatric clinical guidelines focusing on antibiotic treatment of pneumonia.     

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis,treatment with steroid and impact on renal outcomes

Background: The use and timing of steroids in the management of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) remains debatable. Aims: To determine the incidence and aetiology of ATIN in our unit, and to examine trends in the use of steroids and their impact on renal outcomes. Methods: Patients with a histological diagnosis of ATIN over a 9‐year period were identified and divided into steroid‐treated (StG) and steroid‐naïve groups (SnG). Mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined. Results: Forty‐nine patients had ATIN as their main diagnosis, 67% of cases were drug‐induced, and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were the second commonest implicated drug category. Majority (75%) of patients received steroids, and eGFR improved to a significantly greater degree in these steroid‐treated patients (3.4‐fold improvement vs 2.0‐fold in SnG; P < 0.05, unpaired t‐test). Despite comparable eGFR at presentation (StG: 11.7; SnG: 15.4), steroid‐treated patients were less likely to receive dialysis, although not significantly so (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.06–1.15, P = 0.066, chi‐squared test). However, there was no significant relation between the degree of eGFR improvement and delay in starting steroids (Pearson r = ?0.25, P > 0.45), and no difference in eGFR at the time of last follow‐up (StG: 33 ± 3; SnG: 32 ± 7; P > 0.9, unpaired t‐test). Conclusion: StG patients had a greater degree of improvement in renal function, but with no correlation between degree of improvement in eGFR and delay in starting steroids, and similar eGFR values at final follow‐up. PPI were the second commonest drug category among drug‐induced cases.