Influence of Age on the Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer for Men and the Development of Second Primary Cancers

Background

Low incidence of breast cancer in men (BCM) (<?1% of all breast cancers) has led to a paucity of outcome data. This study evaluated the impact of age on BCM outcomes.

Methods

For this study, BCM patients treated between 2000 and 2011 were stratified by age (≤?65 or?>?65 years). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Competing-risk methods analyzed time to second primary cancers (SPCs), with any-cause death treated as a competing risk.

Results

The study identified 152 BCM patients with a median age of 64 years (range 19–96 years). The median body mass index (BMI) was 28 kg/m². Men age 65 years or younger (n?=?78, 51%) were more overweight/obese than men older than 65 years (n?=?74, 49%) (89% vs 74%, respectively; P?=?0.008). Both groups had similar nodal metastases rates (P?=?0.4), estrogen receptor positivity (P?=?1), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)neu overexpression (P?=?0.6). Men 65 years of age or younger were more likely to receive chemotherapy (P?=?0.002). The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (range 0.1–14.4 years). The 5-year OS was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80–93%), whereas the 5-year BCSS was 95% (95% CI 91–99%). The BCM patients 65 years of age and younger had better OS (P?=?0.003) but not BCSS (P?=?0.8). The 5-year cumulative incidence of SPC was 8.4% (95% CI 3.4–13.4%). The prior SPC rate was higher for men older than 65 years (n?=?20, 31%) than for those age 65 years or younger (n?=?7, 11%) (P?=?0.008). This did not account for differences in life years at risk. No difference was observed in SPC cumulative incidence stratified by age (P?=?0.3).

Conclusions

Men 65 years of age or younger received more chemotherapy and had improved OS, but not BCSS, compared with men older than 65 years. For all BCM, SPC is a risk, and appropriate screening may be warranted.

     

Clinical Trials for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a non-obligatory precursor to invasive breast carcinoma, with a variable natural history and biological potential for progression to invasive disease. Over the past 30 years, clinical trials have applied the therapeutic principles used for invasive carcinoma to treat DCIS (surgery, with or without breast radiotherapy, and post-operative endocrine therapy), with excellent survival outcomes, and in-breast recurrence rates that range from 0.5 to 1% annually. However, half of such recurrences are again in-situ lesions, and intensive therapy is likely not necessary for all patients. Current clinical research is focused on a better characterization of the potential of individual lesions to progress to invasive disease, and to identify women who would do well with lesser treatment. Three ongoing trials in the United States and Europe randomize women to active surveillance (with or without endocrine therapy) versus usual treatment with surgery and radiotherapy. The use of pre-operative endocrine therapy has been evaluated in a recently completed trial of letrozole use in postmenopausal women with DCIS; and in on-going trials of tamoxifen, used either orally, or as a 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel formulation for application to the breast skin. This review summaries the major past and current clinical trials of DCIS, and the likely trajectories of DCIS management in the near future.     

What Is the Impact of Advancing Age on the Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background

The global demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing, underscoring its moniker as the “operation of the century.” However, debate still exists as to whether the elderly who undergo the operation achieve the same outcomes as those younger. In this study, we sought to investigate the association between older age and the risks and benefits of THA.

Managing Anxiety and Depression During Treatment

Here, we review the prevalence and treatment of anxiety and depression among patients with breast cancer. Cancer‐related symptoms include similarities to responses to traumatic stress. Well‐developed screening devices for identifying and tracking psychiatric comorbidity are discussed. Basic principles of psychopharmacology, and individual and group psychotherapy are presented. Finally, effects of effective treatment of anxiety and depression on quality of life and overall survival are reviewed.