Managing Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study of Multidisciplinary Teams With Specialist Heart Failure Nurses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of health care clinicians working in multidisciplinary teams that include specialist heart failure nurses when caring for the management of heart failure patients.

METHODS

We used a qualitative in-depth interview study nested in a broader ethnographic study of unplanned admissions in heart failure patients (HoldFAST). We interviewed 24 clinicians across primary, secondary, and community care in 3 locations in the Midlands, South Central, and South West of England.

RESULTS

Within a framework of the role and contribution of the heart failure specialist nurse, our study identified 2 thematic areas that the clinicians agreed still represent particular challenges when working with heart failure patients. The first was communication with patients, in particular explaining the diagnosis and helping patients to understand the condition. The participants recognized that such communication was most effective when they had a long-term relationship with patients and families and that the specialist nurse played an important part in achieving this relationship. The second was communication within the team. Multidisciplinary input was especially needed because of the complexity of many patients and issues around medications, and the participants believed the specialist nurse may facilitate team communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the role of specialist heart failure nurses in delivering education tailored to patients and facilitating better liaison among all clinicians, particularly when dealing with the management of comorbidities and drug regimens. The way in which specialist nurses were able to be caseworkers for their patients was perceived as a method of ensuring coordination and continuity of care.     

Luteal phase deficiency: characterization of reproductive hormones over the menstrual cycle

The recurrent deficiency of progesterone (P) secretion by the corpus luteum has been associated with infertility and habitual abortion and given the clinical diagnosis of luteal phase deficiency (LPD). There is evidence that both follicular and luteal phase abnormalities can result in LPD cycles. In this study we have examined reproductive hormone levels and preovulatory follicular size in women with LPD (n = 10). For the purposes of this study, LPD was determined by an endometrial biopsy in the studied cycle that was more than 2 days out of phase. These biopsies were performed in women with infertility or habitual abortion who exhibited an out of phase biopsy in a prior cycle. The control group consisted of 28 normal women. Daily serum levels of the following hormones were determined in each subject: LH and FSH [immuno- and bioactive (LH-immuno and LH-bio)], P, estradiol (E2), and inhibin. The LPD women exhibited significant decreases in integrated luteal phase levels of inhibin [10,615 +/- 898 vs. 13,560 +/- 662 (U/L).days; P less than 0.02] and E2 [5,015 +/- 275 vs. 6,435 +/- 393 (pmol/L).days (1366 vs. 1753 (pg/mL).days); P less than 0.05] in addition to the expected decrease in P [280 +/- 23 vs. 420 +/- 23 (nmol/L).days (88 vs. 132 (ng/mL).days); P less than 0.01]. On days 6-11 after the LH surge (day 0), there was a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease in mean LH-bio levels in LPD compared with those in normal women (146 +/- 26 vs. 212 +/- 24 micrograms/L). The midcycle LH surge was deficient in LPD when both LH-immuno [482 +/- 30 vs. 672 +/- 43 (micrograms/L).days; P less than 0.01] and LH-bio [1711 +/- 179 vs. 2248 +/- 226 (micrograms/L).days; P less than 0.05] levels were compared with normal values. When comparing the follicular phase in LPD with that in normal women, similar follicle size, peak and integrated E2 levels, and mean LH and FSH (immuno and bio) levels were found. The only follicular phase abnormality noted in this study was decreased mean levels of serum inhibin in the early and midfollicular phases (221 +/- 19 vs. 308 +/- 25 U/L; P less than 0.01). In this group of women with LPD, low levels of inhibin in the follicular phase were consistent with the concept of a defect in function of the preovulatory follicle, possibly as a result of previously described defects in gonadotropin secretion in this condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

How do people with knee pain from osteoarthritis respond to a brief video delivering empowering education about the condition and its management?

ObjectiveTo evaluate responses by people with knee osteoarthritis to a brief educational video about their condition that aimed to empower and motivate effective self-management. The video content addressed psychosocial contributors to pain and barriers to behaviour change.MethodsA mixed methods design, including a survey and semi-structured interviews, was used to collect data from 118 people (46–83 years, 78% female) with knee osteoarthritis.ResultsQuantitative data analysis showed the video was rated positively on 0–6 scales for enjoyability (mean 5.0), helpfulness (4.9), relevance (5.0) and believability (5.4). The majority would recommend the video (89%), learned new information (78%) and/or reported intentions to change behaviour (78%). A minority disliked aspects of the video (23%). The thematic analyses identified three main themes: Reactions to the video, including emotions; Learning from the video, including new knowledge and empowerment, but also unmet information needs or disagreement; and Intentions, including behaviour changes, cognitive changes and help seeking.ConclusionEducation about knee osteoarthritis with a focus on empowerment is well received by people with the condition, although some discordant views emerged.Practice implicationsThe educational video about knee osteoarthritis can be recommended to promote effective self-management and counteract potential drawbacks associated with biomedical-based education.     

Contraceptive efficacy of a depot progestin and androgen combination in men

WHO studies provided proof of concept for hormonal male contraception using a prototype androgen-alone regimen. Combined testosterone plus progestin regimens offer more practical promise, but no contraceptive efficacy studies have been completed. The objective of this study was to establish the proof of principle for depot hormonal androgen/progestin combination as a male contraceptive. We performed a contraceptive efficacy study of 55 healthy men in stable fertile relationships seeking a change in contraceptive method. Testosterone (four 200-mg implants, every 4 or 6 months) and 300 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, im, every 3 months were administered. Once sperm output was suppressed (<1 million/ml for 2 consecutive months), men entered a 12-month contraceptive efficacy period, ceasing other contraception. The main outcome measure was contraceptive failure (pregnancy) rate. No pregnancies occurred in 426 person-months (35.5 person-years; 95% confidence limits for contraceptive failure rate, 0-8%/annum), superior to the first year failure rate of condoms, the only reversible male method. Sperm density fell rapidly, so 94% of men entered the efficacy phase by 3 months, with only 2 of 55 (3.6%) men not sufficiently suppressed to enter efficacy. A few men treated with testosterone implants at 6-month intervals demonstrated androgen deficiency symptoms and/or escape of gonadotropin and spermatogenic suppression between months 5 and 6; after a protocol amendment, all men receiving testosterone implants at 4-month intervals avoided androgen deficiency or loss of gonadotropin and sperm output suppression. Recovery was complete (median, 3.6 months to sperm reappearance and 5.0 months to 20 million sperm/ml) in all but one man with an incidental testicular disorder. Discontinuations were for protocol-related reasons (n = 15) or altered personal circumstances (n = 12), but there were no serious adverse effects related to drug exposure. The first male contraceptive efficacy study using a prototype depot androgen/progestin combination demonstrates high contraceptive efficacy with satisfactory short-term safety and recovery of spermatogenesis. Further studies of purpose-developed products are required to extend the overall safety and efficacy experience with depot androgen/progestin combinations, the most promising approach to hormonal male contraception.     

Evaluation of the impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation intervention: a single centre pre–post study from Ethiopia

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy - Background The role of pharmacists in medication reconciliation (MedRec) is highly acknowledged in many developed nations. However, the impact of this...     

Optimal sampling of antipsychotic medicines: a pharmacometric approach for clinical practice

Aim

To determine optimal sampling strategies to allow the calculation of clinical pharmacokinetic parameters for selected antipsychotic medicines using a pharmacometric approach.

Methods

This study utilized previous population pharmacokinetic parameters of the antipsychotic medicines aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone (including 9-OH risperidone) and ziprasidone. d-optimality was utilized to identify time points which accurately predicted the pharmacokinetic parameters (and expected error) of each drug at steady-state. A standard two stage population approach (STS) with MAP-Bayesian estimation was used to compare area under the concentration–time curves (AUC) generated from sparse optimal time points and rich extensive data. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was used to simulate 1000 patients with population variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Forward stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the most predictive time points of the AUC for each drug at steady-state.

Results

Three optimal sampling times were identified for each antipsychotic medicine. For aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, risperidone, 9-OH risperidone, quetiapine and ziprasidone the CV% of the apparent clearance using optimal sampling strategies were 19.5, 8.6, 9.5, 13.5, 12.9, 10.0, 16.0 and 10.7, respectively. Using the MCS and linear regression approach to predict AUC, the recommended sampling windows were 16.5–17.5 h, 10–11 h, 23–24 h, 19–20 h, 16.5–17.5 h, 22.5–23.5 h, 5–6 h and 5.5–6.5 h, respectively.

Conclusion

This analysis provides important sampling information for future population pharmacokinetic studies and clinical studies investigating the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic medicines.