Alternative delivery system for controlled drugs in the surgical intensive care unit

Faced with a serious shortage of qualified nurses for critically ill patients, methods to reduce the time required to deliver care without sacrificing quality are needed. A non-electronic device designed as a patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) was evaluated as a nurse-controlled device (NCA). Twenty-five intubated patients received morphine sulfate (MS) with the nurse-controlled device (NCA) and 12 by standard IV push policy. The average nursing time for narcotic dosing with the standard policy was 5 minutes/unit dose. A total of 1,183 NCA doses were given over 77 patient days. The average doses per patient day were 15 (2-38). The average nursing time was 22 seconds/NCA dose. The NCA saved 85 nursing minutes/patient day. Annual nursing labor costs were reduced by $77,000.00 with NCA. Total costs for standard IV push narcotic use were $36.43/patient day versus $35.45/patient day for NCA. Using this protocol, the NCA system saved $8,500.00 annually. By increasing the duration of PCA use to 72 hours, the annual savings would become $49,500.00. These data indicate that a simple NCA can deliver controlled drugs rapidly and safely, save valuable nursing time, and decrease the cost of ICU care.     

Partial tolerance in rat renal allograft recipients following multiple blood transfusions and concomitant cyclosporine

Multiple prior administrations of donor-strain blood while under limited cyclosporine cover, consistently induce extensive rat renal allograft survival and transplantation tolerance. Yet it was hypothesized that some chronic rejection mechanisms were nevertheless operative since consistent but nonprogressive minor renal dysfunction was observed long-term. A histopathologic study on these putative tolerant rats was undertaken to test this hypothesis. Twenty long-term LEW recipients of BN renal allografts receiving the blood-CsA regimen were examined histopathologically at day 100 post-transplant. Sixteen control LEW recipients receiving only a BN renal allograft were studied acutely at day 7 posttransplant. The control recipients demonstrated a range of lesions consistent with previous studies on acute renal allograft rejection in the rat. However, tolerant recipients demonstrated mild-to-moderate lesions consistent with chronic mechanisms of rejection including the following: moderate focal interstitial mononuclear inflammatory cellular infiltration, with periglomerular and perivascular accumulation; occasional arteriolar luminal obliteration and glomerular atrophy; focal areas of moderate interstitial fibrosis; mild interstitial hemorrhage; mild-to-moderate tubular atrophy; and focal tubular necrosis. Previously our laboratory has documented that tissue-specific renal basement membrane antigens may be responsible for inciting this pattern of focal chronic interstitial inflammation. However, from the present histopathologic studies, it would appear likely that chronic rejection mechanisms in these recipients, which were defined as tolerant by immunologic criteria, involve both tissue-specific and MHC determinants. Therefore, induction of transplantation tolerance in these indefinite survivors is partial or incomplete.     

Management of superficial G2 (pTa and pT1) bladder cancer

A total of 143 patients with superficial G2 (pTa, pT1) bladder cancer (48 G2pTa; 95 G2pT1) presenting between 1970 through 1987 were reviewed. Of 48 patients with G2pTa followed for up to eighteen years, G3 recurrence developed only in 1 (2.0%), and invasive cancer (greater than pT2) developed only in 2 (4.2%). They both received radiotherapy and have responded completely. There have been no cancer-related deaths. In contrast, in the 95 patients in whom the basement membrane had been breached (pT1), higher grade tumor (G3) developed in 11 (11.5%), and 15 (16%) had recurrences with invasion of muscle (greater than pT2). Among these there were 7 (7.3%) cancer-related deaths.     

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2005; Vol.14, No.3, 158–166

The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2005; Vol.14, No.3, 158–166. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.