Pancreatic transplant imaging

Forty-four clinical episodes of suspected (pancreas) transplant rejection in 17 pancreatic transplantation patients were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical impression of acute graft rejection, chronic rejection, or nonrejection in each episode was correlated with the results of 19 nuclear medicine, 12 ultrasound (US), and 44 magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies. US was found to be a moderately sensitive (82%) method of detecting graft rejection. US also was effective in identifying intra- and peripancreatic fluid accumulations. Nuclear medicine imaging was also a sensitive technique (86%) and the only modality that provided physiologic information regarding graft perfusion. MR imaging allowed correct prediction of the presence or absence of graft rejection in 39 of 44 cases (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 76%) and was an effective means of detecting pathologic fluid collections. Nuclear medicine, US, and MR imaging are all believed to be sensitive methods of detecting graft rejection and are complementary adjuncts to the clinical evaluation of pancreatic transplants.     

Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allograft: Is the elevated risk of failure independent of the model for end-stage liver disease score of the recipient?

BACKGROUND: The role of asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients is unknown. There is no clear evidence of its effect on transplanted kidney. METHODS: We studied urine cytokines profile among kidney transplant recipients with bacteriuria found in screening examination. Urine cultures were collected in 269 patients with stable graft function and serum creatinine level <2 mg/dl, during their routine visits. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 levels were measured in urine samples from patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection and patients without bacteriuria (control group). Changes in serum creatinine level in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria and in the control group were observed during 12 months follow up. RESULTS: Urinary tract infection (UTI) was diagnosed in five patients and asymptomatic bacteriuria in 22 patients. Urine IL-6 level was significantly higher in symptomatic UTI group (median 15.71 pg/mg) but there were no differences between group of patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (3.92 pg/mg) and control group (2.54 pg/mg). Urine IL-8 level was higher in symptomatic UTI group (median 146.8 pg/mg) and was also significantly higher in asymptomatic bacteriuria group (33.49 pg/mg) in comparison to control group (2.97 pg/mg; P=0.0002). During 1-year follow up, incidence of UTI was higher in the asymptomatic bacteriuria group than in the control group but graft function was not different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated urine IL-8 level in kidney transplant patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria may reflect impaired immune response to bacterial infection and occult inflammatory process in urinary tract.     

Salvage procedure for unexpected portal vein thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is considered a relative contraindication to living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) due to technical difficulty and ethical considerations. So far, there have been a few reported cases of LDLTx with PVT, most of which were treated by thrombectomy with or without a venous conduit. We report a case of LDLTx in an unexpected recipient with grade 4 diffuse PVT, which was successfully managed using a variceal left gastric vein and a deceased donor iliac vein conduit to create a "de novo portal vein" for splanchnic inflow to the right lobe. The patient experienced an uneventful postoperative course with normal blood flow in the de novo portal vein at 1-year follow up. This report demonstrated that a variceal collateral vein can be used as appropriate alternative inflow for the right lobe in LDLTx cases in which an unexpected PVT is encountered.