Cytologische Studien an Tumorzellen des Mäuse-Ascites

Ohne ZusammenfassungMit 5 Textabbildungen (38 Einzelbilder).     

WONCA研究论文摘要汇编——基层抑郁症风险患者的连续性服务

背景目前已开展了对重性精神病患者进提供连续性服务的研究。目的探讨基层对有抑郁症风险患者提供连续性服务的水平,并与对心力衰竭患者的服务水平进行对比。方法采用抑郁症风险患者与心力衰竭患者对比的探索性研究。采用患者问卷评估服务的持续性,包含如下内容:(1)联系的服务提供者数(个人连续性);(2)诊所内服务提供者之间的合作(团队连续性)(6个项目,分数1~5分);(3)诊所外全科医师与服务提供者之间的合作(跨界连续性)(4个项目,分数1~5分)。结果大多数抑郁症风险患者在过去1年中寻遍整个服务提供界联系了几个服务提供者,曾遇到过高水平团队连续性服务及低水平跨界连续性服务。在诊所中可接触到的不同服务提供者要明显多于心力衰竭患者服务提供者(P<0.01)。抑郁症风险患者的服务提供者之间的合作更好一些,每项平均得分4.3分,心力衰竭患者得分为4.0分(P=0.03)。然而,跨界连续性服务方面正好相反:抑郁症风险患者每项平均得分3.5分,心力衰竭患者得分为4.0分(P=0.01)。结论抑郁症风险患者与心力衰竭患者之间的探索性对比显示:体验服务连续性方面的差距不大。对此还应行进一步分析。     

Prior use of anticoagulation is associated with a better survival in COVID-19

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events. The role of anticoagulation (AC) prior...     

Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis and Felty's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether promoter polymorphisms associated with variation in interleukin-10 (IL-10) production are relevant to the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Felty's syndrome (FS). METHODS: DNA was obtained from 44 FS patients, 117 RA patients and 295 controls. The promoter region between -533 and - 1120 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and polymorphisms detected by restriction enzyme digest or sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in allele or haplotype frequencies between the groups. CONCLUSION: There is no association between FS or RA and these recently identified IL-10 promoter polymorphisms. Other genetic or environmental factors could explain the alterations in IL-10 levels seen in these conditions.      

Old and new cardiovascular risk factors: from unresolved issues to new opportunities

With the aim of identifying areas that may deserve some further thinking the present review deliberately points out controversial issues in cardiovascular research and risk assessment. In the first part of the review general aspects are addressed regarding the evaluation of risk factors. A first point of concern is the frequent practice of combining different vascular events and effects in different vascular beds into a single endpoint. Furthermore, verification of vascular events in clinical reality may be surprisingly inaccurate. Problems in risk assessment also arise from overlapping properties (shared pathophysiological pathways) of traditional risk factors like hypertension, obesity and diabetes. In the second part of the review unresolved issues concerning selected established and emerging risk factors are discussed. The difficulty of establishing causality in cardiovascular disease is addressed, using modification of LDL cholesterol and accumulating evidence for pleiotropic effects of the LDL cholesterol-lowering statins as an example. As an alternative or supplement to the notion of LDL-related cardiovascular risk it is proposed to distinguish between statin-sensitive and statin-insensitive cardiovascular risk. Finally the future prospects of selected new and emerging risk factors like CRP, homocysteine, asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), oxLDL, and isoprostanes are evaluated. In summary, imprecise terminology and varying definitions of "cardiovascular risk" may lead to a considerable blurring of our current risk estimates, which may also explain some presently controversial issues. With several new risk factors and substantial changes in lifestyle and treatment patterns on the horizon major changes in the hierarchy of risk factors may be inevitable.