Empirical treatment of lower urinary tract infections in the face of spreading multidrug resistance: in vitro study on the effectiveness of nitroxoline

The spread of antimicrobial resistance challenges the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Among others, nitrofurantoin is recommended for first-line treatment, but acceptance among clinicians is limited due to chronic nitrofurantoin-induced lung toxicity and insufficient coverage of Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli. Nitroxoline appears to be an alternative to nitrofurantoin owing to its favourable safety profile, however data on its current in vitro susceptibility are sparse. In this study, susceptibility to nitroxoline was tested against 3012 urinary clinical isolates (including multidrug-resistant bacteria and Candida spp.) by disk diffusion test and/or broth microdilution. At least 91% of all Gram-negatives (n?=?2000), Gram-positives (n?=?403) and yeasts (n?=?132) had inhibition zone diameters for nitroxoline ≥18?mm. Except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, nitroxoline MIC₉₀ values were ≤16?mg/L and were 2- to >16-fold lower compared with nitrofurantoin. In extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), MIC₉₀ values of nitroxoline were two-fold higher compared with non-ESBL-producing enterobacteria and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). The in vitro efficacies of nitroxoline and nitrofurantoin against ATCC strains of E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Proteus mirabilis were compared by time–kill curves in Mueller–Hinton broth and artificial urine. Nitroxoline was non-inferior against E. coli, P. mirabilis and E. faecalis in artificial urine. In conclusion, nitroxoline showed a broad antimicrobial spectrum, with inhibition zone diameters and MICs of nitroxoline well below the EUCAST breakpoint for E. coli for most organisms, and thus may also be a target for therapy of uncomplicated UTIs.     

Effects of high-dose baclofen on cue reactivity in alcohol dependence: A randomized,placebo-controlled pharmaco-fMRI study

Increased functional brain response towards alcohol-associated stimuli is a neural hallmark of alcohol dependence and a promising target for pharmacotherapy. For the first time, we assessed the effects of individually titrated high-dose baclofen on cue reactivity and functional connectivity in alcohol-dependent (AD) patients in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).We investigated 23 recently detoxified AD patients and 23 matched healthy controls (HC) with a cue reactivity functional magnetic resonance imaging task. Patients were further scanned at baseline without medication and during treatment with high-dose baclofen/placebo (30–270 mg/d). Analyses were conducted for alcohol cue-elicited brain response, alcohol cue-modulated and stimulus-independent functional connectivity with left ventral tegmental area (VTA) as seed region.At baseline, AD patients (N?=?23) showed increased cue-elicited brain activation in the ventral striatum (VS) compared to HC (N?=?23), which was decreased at the second scanning session compared to baseline. Patients receiving baclofen (N?=?10) showed a significant stronger decrease in cue-elicited brain activation in left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), bilateral amygdala and left VTA than patients receiving placebo (N?=?13). Treatment with baclofen further led to a decrease in alcohol cue-modulated functional connectivity between left VTA and left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as well as left medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Regarding clinical outcome, significantly more patients of the baclofen group remained abstinent during the high-dose period.Baclofen specifically decreased cue-elicited brain responses in areas known to be involved in the processing of salient (appetitive and aversive) stimuli. Treatment with high-dose baclofen seems to provide a pharmacological relief of this neural “warning signal” evoked by alcohol-related cues, thereby possibly supporting patients in remaining abstinent.Trial Registration Identifier of the main trial [BACLAD study] at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01266655.     

Effects of squalene on expression of LDLR in HepG2 cells and its mechanism北大核心CSCD

Aim To investigate the effect of squalene on LDLR expression in HepG2 cells and its mechanism of down-regulated cholesterol. Methods The proliferation of HepG2 cells exposed to squalene at different concentrations was measured by MTT assay. The effect of squalene on the expression of LDLR in HepG2 cells was measured by flow cytometry and fluorescence mi-croscopy. The effect of different concentrations of squalene on the interaction between SCAP and Insig2, two key protein molecules of SREBP pathway, was assayed by FRET technology. Results MTT results showed that squalene had inhibitory effect on the proliferation of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy results showed that squalene enhanced LDLR expression in HepG2 cells compared with the control group. The results of FRET technology revealed that compared with model control group, the YFP fluorescence value in Squalene group dramatically declined, and the YFP fluorescence value of each drug group decreased with the range of 5-25 |xmol L1 squalene concentration. Conclusions Squalene may promote the expression of LDLR in HepG2 cells through inhibiting the interaction between SCAP and Insig2 proteins in SREBP pathway, which may confirm that squalene is a potential novel drug for the down-regulation of cholesterol level. © 2018 Publication Centre of Anhui Medical University. All rights reserved.     

I Am Quite Mellow But I Wouldn't Say Everyone Else Is”: How UK Students Compare Their Drinking Behavior to Their Peers'

Background: Excessive drinking is commonplace at UK Universities. Individuals may misperceive how much they drink compared to others and are less likely to think that they will suffer adverse consequences. Young people often distance themselves and their friends from ‘problem drinkers’. Objectives: The aim of the study was to explore how student drinkers compared their own drinking behaviors to the drinking behaviors of others. Methods: An online survey was completed by 416 students aged 18–30 (68.5% female). They were asked ‘how do you think your drinking compares with other people like you?' and ‘how do you think your behavior when you drink compares with other people like you?’ Answers were subjected to thematic analysis. Results: The first main theme was about ‘identification as a ‘good’ drinker’. Participants suggested their own behavior when drinking was similar to their sober behavior. Further, they viewed themselves as more able to maintain a balance between staying in control and having fun while drinking. The second main theme was about ‘distancing from being a ‘bad’ drinker. Participants distanced themselves from negative prototypical drinkers, such compulsive or anti-social drinkers. They also attributed their own drinking behaviors to situational factors, but described other people as intentionally violent or aggressive. Conclusions/Importance: These findings may explain the failure of some health messages to change drinking behaviors. If drinkers perceive that their behavior when they drink is better than other people's then they may discount intervention messages. Targeting these biases could be incorporated into future interventions.