The combination of prazosin and verapamil in the treatment of essential hypertension

An exaggerated fall in blood pressure has been reported with the combination of an alpha 1-blocker and a calcium antagonist. This study investigated, in a placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial, the clinical usefulness of the combination of prazosin (2 mg b.i.d.) and verapamil (160 mg b.i.d.). Therapeutic efficacy was monitored at regular outpatient visits: average supine and erect blood pressures were, respectively, 175/99 and 176/103 mm Hg with placebo, 160/91 and 164/96 mm Hg with single drug treatment, and 152/84 and 152/89 mm Hg with combination therapy. This significant and clinically useful reduction in blood pressure had an overall magnitude of approximately 28/18 mm Hg (supine) and 29/19 mm Hg (erect). Further measurements were made during a series of intensive study days, and the most important additional finding was a pharmacokinetic interaction that resulted in increased peak concentrations and bioavailability of prazosin. In conclusion, the combination of prazosin and verapamil proved effective in the treatment of 12 patients with essential hypertension who had been poorly responsive to conventional treatment with a beta-blocker and thiazide diuretic.     

An analysis for blood manganese used to assess environmental exposure

In this graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometric method for measuring manganese in whole blood, we use a pyrolytic platform to minimize interference by sample matrix. For optimal sample ashing we denature the sample within the furnace with nitric acid and use oxygen as the purge gas at low temperatures. The mean manganese concentration found in blood from 15 unexposed city dwellers was 215 (2 SD 135) nmol/L. By comparison, the range of manganese concentrations in blood sampled from a group of Australian aborigines living near a surface manganese ore deposit on Groote Eylandt, Northern Territory, was much higher (median 405 nmol/L, range 175 to 990 nmol/L).     

Brain mechanisms in the control of food intake—30 years on

Do brain systems exist which control not only increases or decreases in food intake, but also bring about specific changes in the size and distribution of meals consumed, alter the selection of particular macronutrients and adjust feeding responses to the perceived pleasantness (hedonic value) of the food? A cautious yes can be given to each of these questions. Moreover, since most experimental work has been carried out on the brains of animals, we can also ask how well these animal data relate to the human condition; given the methodological issues involved in making such inferences, the answer is remarkably well.     

A Comparison Between Recipients Receiving Matched Kidney and Those Receiving Mismatched Kidney from the Same Cadaver Donor

The optimal allocation of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation with reference to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match and sharing these organs to a distant center remains controversial. The current analysis was performed using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for cadaveric kidney transplants (Tx) between 1988 and 1997. The graft survivals of zero-mismatch (matched) kidneys with the mate (mismatched) kidneys were compared. There were 2385 donors and 4770 Tx. Significant differences in recipient demographics between matched and mismatched Tx were: fewer African-American race (AA) in the matched group (9.0% vs. 21.9%), higher number of previous Tx (25.5% vs. 14.8%) and elevated mean cold ischemia time (24.0 vs. 22.2 h). Post-Tx dialysis requirements were similar (22.8% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.62) and matched kidneys had to travel more distance (920 vs. 232 miles). Using a Cox model, the matched group had a decreased relative hazard of graft failure of 23.0% (p = 0.0002) or 35% (p < 0.0001) with and without censoring for death. There was significantly better graft survival in the matched recipients in all pairs except AA (matched) and non-AA (mismatched). For older donors (> or = 50 years, n = 1508), the matched grafts survival was marginally significant (p =0.05). Matched kidneys have improved survival compared with the mismatched kidneys despite the longer distance traveled. The benefit of mismatched transplants was predominantly seen in non-AA.