Perioperative bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves on long-term oral anticoagulants (from the REGIMEN Registry)

Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves require long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). During the temporary interruption of OAT, bridging anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended. This prespecified subgroup analysis from REGIMEN-a large, prospective, multicenter registry-compared UFH (n = 73) and LMWH (n = 172) as bridging anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves on long-term OAT. Patient demographics and co-morbidities were generally similar between groups. There were more bileaflet valves in the LMWH group (67.4% vs 43.8%, p = 0.0005), but no differences in valve positions between groups. The LMWH group was less likely to undergo major surgery (33.7% vs 58.9%, p = 0.0002) and cardiothoracic surgery (7.6% vs 19.2%, p = 0.008), and to receive intraprocedural anticoagulants or thrombolytics (4.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.007). Major adverse event rates (5.5% vs 10.3%, p = 0.23) and major bleeds (4.2% vs 8.8%, p = 0.17) were similar in the LMWH and UFH groups, respectively; 1 arterial thromboembolic event occurred in each group. More LMWH-bridged patients were treated as outpatients or discharged from the hospital in <24 hours (68.6% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis found no significant differences in major bleeds and major composite adverse events when adjusting for cardiothoracic or major surgery between groups. In conclusion, for patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves on long-term OAT, mostly outpatient-based LMWH bridging therapy appears to be feasible for selected procedures, is as safe as UFH, and is associated with a low arterial thromboembolic rate.     

Ten-year survival and factors associated with increased mortality in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure in Thailand

INTRODUCTIONData on the long-term outcomes of Asian patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure is scarce. The objectives of this study were to determine short-term, intermediate-term and long-term survival among patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure in Thailand, and to identify factors independently associated with increased mortality.METHODSPatients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of heart failure were enrolled in the Thai Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Registry (ADHERE) from 18 hospitals located across Thailand during 2006. Medical record data was collected according to ADHERE protocol. Mortality data was collected from death certificates on file at the Thailand Bureau of Registration Administration.RESULTSA total of 1,451 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 63.7 ± 14.4 years, and 49.7% were male. One-year, five-year and ten-year mortality rates in Thai patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure were 28.0%, 58.2% and 73.3%, respectively. Independent predictors of increased mortality were identified. There were more cardiovascular-related deaths than non-cardiovascular-related deaths (54.6% vs. 45.4%, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe ten-year mortality rate in Thai patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure was 73.3%. Many factors were found to be independently associated with increased mortality, including left ventricular ejection fraction.     

Prevalent inhibitors in haemophilia B subjects enrolled in the Universal Data Collection database

Several risk factors for inhibitors have recently been described for haemophilia A. It has been assumed that similar risk factors are also relevant for haemophilia B, but there is limited data to confirm this notion. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors associated with inhibitors in haemophilia B. The database of the Universal Data Collection (UDC) project of the Centers for Disease Control for the years 1998–2011 was queried to determine the prevalence of inhibitors in haemophilia B subjects. In addition, disease severity, race/ethnicity, age, factor exposure and prophylaxis usage were evaluated to determine their impact on inhibitor prevalence. Of the 3785 male subjects with haemophilia B enrolled in the UDC database, 75 (2%) were determined to have an inhibitor at some point during the study period. Severe disease (OR 13.1, 95% CI 6.2–27.7), black race (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.1), and age <11 years (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5–4.0) were found to be significantly associated with having an inhibitor. There was insufficient data to determine if type of factor used and prophylaxis were associated with inhibitors. Inhibitors in haemophilia B are much less prevalent than haemophilia A, especially in patients with mild disease. Similar factors associated with inhibitors in haemophilia A also seem to be present for haemophilia B. The information collected by this large surveillance project did not permit evaluation of potential risk factors related to treatment approaches and exposures, and additional studies will be required.