Optische Qualität nach refraktiver Hornhautchirurgie

Correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism within its indicated margin by means of refractive corneal surgical procedures such as LASIK and surface ablation (e.g. PRK) is one of the standard procedures in ophthalmology. Now that advances in the fields of surgical techniques and the technical devices employed have further progressed in terms of safety and predictability, research also focuses on optical quality. "Optical quality" is not a clearly defined parameter, but can be captured indirectly by means of directly measured data. One has to start with the anatomical properties of the eye, which determine the optical images on the retinal level. The quality of the retinal image influences the eye's function, i.e. acuity and contrast perception. Finally, there is the subjective perception of the image we receive. "Optical quality" as such is reflected by the patient's evaluation of this image perception. Three phenomena are especially responsible for deterioration of the quality of the retinal image: diffraction, aberrations and dispersion. Some of the methods for measuring optical quality are subjective questionnaires, functional testing procedures for measuring visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, optical measuring procedures for the determination of optical quality, as well as biomicroscopy, aberrometry and corneal topography for assessing anatomical changes.     

Scheimpflug measurement of intraocular lens position after piggyback implantation of foldable intraocular lenses in eyes with high hyperopia

PURPOSE: To investigate the position of 3-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) after piggyback implantation for high hyperopia. SETTING: University Eye Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. METHODS: Eight eyes of 5 highly hyperopic patients had phacoemulsification and implantation of 2 foldable IOLs. In 3 eyes, both IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag. In 5 eyes, 1 IOL was placed in the capsular bag and the second IOL in the ciliary sulcus. Intraocular lens optic tilt and decentration, combined thickness of both IOLs, and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured postoperatively over a period of 18 months using Scheimpflug photography. RESULTS: All eyes with both IOLs in the capsular bag showed interpseudophakic opacification, with a mean increase in combined IOL thickness of 0.4 mm, a decrease in ACD of 0.3 mm, and a corresponding hyperopic shift of 4.00 diopters. Eyes in which the anterior IOL was placed in the ciliary sulcus showed no changes in refraction or combined IOL thickness. In these eyes, the anterior IOL had a higher mean decentration (0.49 mm +/- 0.20 [SD] after 12 months) than the posterior IOL (0.21 +/- 0.13 mm after 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Piggyback IOL implantation with placement of 2 foldable IOLs in the capsular bag can be followed by a hyperopic shift that may be caused in part by displacement of the IOLs. Placement of the anterior IOL in the ciliary sulcus can lead to higher decentration of this IOL.     

International society for clinical electrophysiology of vision (ISCEV)

Announcements

International society for clinical electrophysiology of vision (ISCEV)     

Modern strategies in the prevention of implant-associated infections

The application of medical devices either for temporary or permanent use has become an indispensible part of almost all fields of medicine. However, foreign bodies are associated with a substantial risk of bacterial and fungal infections. Implant-associated infections significantly contribute to the still increasing problem of nosocomial infections. To reduce the incidence of such infections, specific guidelines providing evidence-based recommendations and comprising both technological and nontechnological strategies for prevention have been established. Strict adherence to hygienic rules during insertion or implantation of the device are aspects of particular importance. Besides such basic and indispensable aspects, the development of new materials which could withstand microbial adherence and colonization has become a major topic in recent years. Modification of surface by primarily physico-chemical methods may lead to a change in specific and unspecific interactions with microorganisms and, thus, to a reduction in microbial adherence. Medical devices made out of a material that would be ideally antiadhesive or at least colonization-resistant would be the most suitable candidates to avoid colonization and subsequent infection. However, it appears impossible to create a surface with an absolute 'zero'-adherence due to thermodynamical reasons and due to the fact that a modified material surface is in vivo rapidly covered by plasma and connective tissue proteins. Therefore, another concept for the prevention of implant-associated infections involves the impregnation of devices with various antimicrobial substances such as antibiotics, antiseptics, and/or metals. In fact, already commercially available materials for clinical use such as antimicrobial catheters have been introduced, in part with considerable impact on subsequent infections. However, future studies are warranted to translate the knowledge on the pathogenesis of device-associated infections into applicable prevention strategies.