How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures

Background

Both our teams were the first to implement pediatric robotic surgery in France. The aim of this study was to define the key points we brought to light so other pediatric teams that want to set up a robotic surgery program will benefit.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of all children who underwent robotic surgery between Nov 2007 and June 2011 in both departments, including patient data, installation and changes, operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative complications, and postoperative outcome. The department’s internal organization, the organization within the hospital complex, and cost were evaluated.

Results

A total of 96 procedures were evaluated. There were 38 girls and 56 boys with average age at surgery of 7.6 years (range, 0.7–18 years) and average weight of 26 kg (range, 6–77 kg). Thirty-six patients had general surgery, 57 patients urologic surgery, and 1 thoracic surgery. Overall average operative time was 189 min (range, 70–550 min), and average hospital stay was 6.4 days (range, 2–24 days). The procedures of 3 patients were converted. Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 0.5–43 months). Robotic surgical procedure had an extra cost of €1934 compared to conventional open surgery.

Conclusions

Our experience was similar to the findings described in the literature for feasibility, security, and patient outcomes; we had an overall operative success rate of 97 %. Three main actors are concerned in the implementation of a robotic pediatric surgery program: surgeons and anesthetists, nurses, and the administration. The surgeon is at the starting point with motivation for minimally invasive surgery without laparoscopic constraints. We found that it was possible to implement a long-lasting robotic surgery program with comparable quality of care.     

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Use of Motor Evoked Potentials in the Evaluation of Surgically Induced Spinal Cord Ischemia

Abstract

We evaluated transcranial magnetic stimulation producing motor evoked potentials (TMS MEP) as a method to detect spinal cord ischemia during surgery for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Four groups of swine were subjected to different types of surgically-induced ischemia. TMS MEP and neurological function were assessed at baseline, immediately after the ischemic insult and after four hours of reperfusion/post-ligation. Cross-clamping of the aorta in groups A & B resulted in the disappearance and subsequent reappearance of TMS MEP with significantly prolonged latencies in most animals and variable neurological function. Ligation of intercostal arteries produced no changes in TMS MEP or neurological function (group C). However, after ligation of intercostal and lumbar arteries, group D demonstrated no reappearance of TMS MEP and severe neurological deficits. TMS MEP can provide rapid detection of global spinal cord ischemia and can also predict local devascularization injury. (J Spinal Cord Med 1997; 20:395-401)     

Root damage induced by intraosseous anesthesia–An in vitro investigation

Objectives: The principle of the intraosseous anesthesia (IOA) relies on the perforation of the cortical plate of the bone for direct application of the local anesthetic solution into the underlying cancellous structures. During this procedure, IOA needles might accidentally come in contact with the tooth roots. The aim of the current in vitro study was to examine the consequences of this ‘worst case scenario’ comparing five commercially available IOA systems. Material and Methods: Extracted human roots were randomly perforated using five different IOA systems with a drilling time ≤5s. To simulate normal in vivo conditions, the roots were kept humid during the drilling procedure. Data was statistically evaluated using F-test (SPSS16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and the significance level was set at p≤0.05. Results: All examined systems resulted in root perforation. Drill fractures occurred in either none 0% (Quicksleeper®, Anesto®, Intraflow®, Stabident®) or 100% (X-Tip®) of the applications. Excessive heat generation, as evident by combustion odor as well as metal and tooth discoloration, appeared in 30% (Quicksleeper®), 40% (Anesto®), 60% (Intraflow®), 90% (Stabident®) and 100% (X-Tip®) of all perforations. Conclusion: Within the limits of in-vitro studies, the results show a potential for irreversible root damage that might be inflicted by an improper use of IOA systems. Key words:Intraosseous anesthesia, complication, root damage.