Erysipelas-like inflammation following breast surgery.

Impaired lymph drainage is an inevitable consequence of any form of surgery that disrupts lymphatics, resulting in a degree of lymphoedema that may vary from subtle to dramatic and although classically involving an entire limb, may be more localised, confined to only a small area such as a skin flap. Infection is a well-recognised complication of lymphoedema. However, not all inflammatory episodes occurring in the setting of lymphatic dysfunction can be clearly attributed to infection as this article demonstrates. Five patients presented over a 5-year period with distinctive erysipelas-like inflammation affecting the breast which occurred several weeks following reduction mammaplasty in four patients and breast reconstruction in one patient. No clinical response was obtained with standard antibiotics. This inflammatory problem may represent a previously unreported complication of breast surgery with an incidence of 4% following reduction mammaplasty. Recent research supports the notion that this type of episode is most likely to be due to a non-infective inflammatory process related to lymphatic dysfunction induced by surgery.     

Adrenergic and dopaminergic control of the canine paw microcirculation

Basal isolated canine paw blood flow was equally distributed between arteriovenous anastomosis (AVA) and capillary circulations. Norepinephrine decreased AVA flow by 92% and capillary flow by 41%. Dopamine significantly reduced AVA flow by 94% compared to baseline with a 37% reduction in capillary flow. However, with alpha-adrenergic blockade dopamine decreased AVA flow 66% while capillary flow increased 42%. Isoproterenol increased capillary flow almost twofold and appeared to decrease AVA flow, although the latter was statistically insignificant. Differential effects of adrenergic and dopaminergic agonists on canine paw AVA and capillary blood flow suggest the existence of independent regulation of these components of the microcirculation.     

High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults

Background contextBack problems (BPs), with their cost and disability, are a substantial burden for individuals, employers, and society.PurposeThis systematic review of controlled trials evaluates the effectiveness of interventions to prevent BP episodes in working age adults.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE/EMBASE through May 2007, and COCHRANE/Trials Registry through August 22, 2008 using search terms of back pain, back injuries or sciatica, linked to prevention, control, workplace interventions, or ergonomics and searched article bibliographies.Study selectionFor systematic review inclusion, articles had to describe prospective controlled trials of interventions to prevent BPs in working-age adults, with intervention assignment either to individual participants or preexisting groups. Of 185 articles identified as potentially relevant, 20 trials (11%) met inclusion criteria.Data extractionResearchers extracted relevant information from controlled trials and graded methodological quality. Because of heterogeneity of trials, meta-analysis was not performed.ResultsOnly exercise was found effective for preventing self-reported BPs in seven of eight trials (effect size 0.39 to >0.69). Other interventions were not found to reduce either incidence or severity of BP episodes compared with controls. Negative trials included five trials of education, four of lumbar supports, two of shoe inserts, and four of reduced lifting programs.ConclusionsTwenty high-quality controlled trials found strong, consistent evidence to guide prevention of BP episodes in working-age adults. Trials found exercise interventions effective and other interventions not effective, including stress management, shoe inserts, back supports, ergonomic/back education, and reduced lifting programs. The varied successful exercise approaches suggest possible benefits beyond their intended physiologic goals.Level of evidenceSystematic review Level I evidence.     

Tendon Graft—Ulna Fixation in Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Stabilisation; Biomechanical Comparison of Three Graft-Bone Fixation Methods

A common distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) stabilisation procedure uses a tendon graft running from the lip of the radial sigmoid notch to the ulnar fovea and through a bony tunnel to the ulnar shaft, before being wrapped round the distal ulna and sutured to itself. Such graft fixation can be challenging and requires a considerable tendon length. The graft length could be reduced by fixing the graft to the ulna using a bone anchor or interference screw. The aim of this study was to compare the strength of three distal ulna graft fixation methods (tendon wrapping and suturing, bone anchor and interference screw). Four human cadaveric ulnae were used. A tendon strip was run through a tunnel in the distal ulna and secured by: (1) wrapping round the shaft and suturing it to itself, (2) a bone anchor and (3) an interference screw in the bone tunnel. Load to failure was determined using a custom-made apparatus and an Instron machine. Maximum failure load was highest for the bone anchor fixation (99.3 ± 23.7 N) followed by the suturing (96.2 ± 12.1 N), and the interference screw fixation (46.9 ± 5.6 N). There was no significant difference between the tendon suturing and bone anchor methods, but the tendon suturing was statistically significantly higher compared to the interference screw (P = 0.028). In performing anatomical stabilisation of the DRUJ fixation of the tendon graft to the distal ulna with a bone anchor provides the most secure fixation. This may make the stabilisation technique less demanding and require a smaller tendon graft.