逆行肝切除治疗难切性肝癌244例报道

目的　逆行肝切除是治疗难切性肝癌的有效方法 ,本文报道了 2 44例临床经验。方法　常规肝切除方法切除困难的 2 44例巨大、显露困难或下腔静脉受累的肝癌采用逆行切肝法结合血管外科技术予以切除 (A组 ) ,同期临床特征类似的 31例肝癌采用常规切肝法切除 ,作为对照 (B组 )。结果　两组均无手术死亡 ,A组与B组相比 ,术中出血量较少 ( 12 90± 998ml比 2 2 86± 136 3ml)、术后胸水发生率 ( 2 6 /2 44比 10 /31)、腹水发生率 ( 72 /2 44比 19/31)、中度到重度黄疸率 ( 14 /2 44比 5 /31)、手术区积液率 ( 17/2 44比 7/31)、膈下感染率 ( 3/2 44比 1/31)、胆漏发生率 ( 2 /2 44比 1/31)、切口感染率 ( 3/2 44比 1/31)以及ALT恢复时间 ( 13.8± 5 .1天比 18.9± 8.9天 )均较低 ,差别具有统计学意义 (P <0 .0 1)。结论　对于难切性肝癌而言 ,逆行肝切除是安全有效的手术方法。     

包括腔静脉旁部的肝右尾叶及全尾叶切除

目的 探讨并总结包括腔静脉旁部肝尾叶切除的方法和经验。方法 分别采用右后途径和左侧途径行右尾叶和全尾叶切除；前者附加部分右后叶切除，后者可为单独全尾叶切除或附加左外叶或左半肝切除。结果 成功施行包括腔静脉旁部的肝尾叶切除13例，其中右尾叶切除7例，全尾叶切除6例；全组无手术死亡，术中、术后均无严重病发症发生；术后平均失血量为896.15ml，平均肝门阻断时间为25.40min，术后平均住院12.38天。结论 虽然解剖关系复杂，切除包括腔静脉旁部的肝尾叶安全可行。     

胆囊腺瘤-腺癌中的DNA含量和基因表达

目的 研究胆囊腺瘤从增殖到恶变中腺上皮细胞的增殖变化和基因表达。方法PCR-RFLP法测定APC、ras基因突变,ABC免疫化学组织染色法测定p53蛋白表达。用TJTY-300全自动图像分析仪测定胆囊上皮细胞核异型性和DNA含量。结果 上皮细胞核异型性和DNA含量在胆囊腺瘤-腺癌过程中逐渐增加。胆囊腺瘤中异倍体比例与腺瘤的大小有明显的关系,直径≥1cm异倍体显著增加(P<0.05)。在胆囊腺瘤-腺癌过程中可检测到APC基因和RAS基因突变。P53蛋白在这一过程中不表达。结论 胆囊腺瘤-腺癌的过程是胆囊癌发生中一条重要的途径。当胆囊腺瘤直径≥1cm时具有明显的癌变潜能。其分子改变机制与胆囊上皮不典型增生-原位癌途径不同。     

Predictors of cervical coinfection with multiple human papillomavirus types.

Women infected with multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) types seem to be at higher risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, although there is controversy about whether coinfections are associated with lower or higher grades of dysplasia. There is no established risk factor profile for infection with multiple HPV types. We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of 2,075 Brazilian women to identify determinants of HPV coinfection. Cervical specimens were collected for cytology and HPV DNA detection. Data on baseline and time-dependent putative risk factors were obtained by interview. Baseline predictors of HPV coinfection included younger age, greater number of recent sexual partners, a history of condyloma but not of other sexually transmitted diseases, and younger age at first sexual intercourse. In repeated measures analyses, there was a weak positive association between the number of sexual partners in the time interval between two study visits and the risk of coinfection. Our results suggest that the risk factor profile for HPV coinfection among HPV-infected women shares several similarities with risk factors for any HPV infection.     

Psychosocial Support for Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

Women with advanced breast cancer frequently experience psychologic distress as a result of their illness and its treatment. This distress may be manifest as depression, anxiety, symptoms of the stress-response syndrome, difficulty coping and social isolation. Six randomized trials of psychosocial interventions have been conducted in metastatic breast cancer. Five of these evaluated group psychosocial support – supportive-expressive therapy in three studies, cognitive-behavioral in one, and a combination of cognitive-behavioral and supportive therapy in another. All of these studies identified psychological benefits, notably improvement in mood, pain control and coping, although benefits were small in one study that provided the control group with a home cognitive-behavioral study program. One study identified an unexpected survival benefit associated with a group intervention – three subsequent studies have failed to replicate this result. Survival results of one additional ongoing study are pending.Studies in early breast cancer, and in patients with a spectrum of other cancers, have demonstrated benefits of individual psychological interventions, educational interventions and relaxation/self-hypnosis/imagery interventions, however, these have not been adequately evaluated in metastatic breast cancer.Based on these results, it is recommended that psychosocial support be offered to women with advanced breast cancer. Current research does not provide sufficient information to determine the optimal type of intervention to be used, or the optimal timing and duration of such interventions. Furthermore, it is not clear which patients benefit the most from psychosocial intervention and whether there are some patients who do not require psychosocial intervention. Research to address these issues is recommended.