Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Providing patients with an audiotape of their medical consultation has been a relatively common practice in oncology clinics for some years. However, broader generalisability of the technique has yet to be examined. AIMS: To investigate the efficacy of providing patients with an audiotape of their consultation in a general practice setting. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial: 95 experimental participants, 85 controls. SETTING: Routine surgeries run by two general practitioners (GPs) in two different health centres. METHOD: All patients attending GP appointments were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up by telephone 7-10 days later. RESULTS: More than half (61%) of the patients who received a tape listened to it. Among listeners, 64% rated the tape useful or very useful; 24% noticed information not heard in the consultation. Half of listeners (46%) said that their understanding of the consultation improved after listening to the tape. Half of the listeners (48%) shared the tape with others, of whom 71% found sharing helpful or very helpful. However, 21% of those who shared the information with others found this unhelpful or very unhelpful, suggesting that patients may need to be briefed on the potential risks of sharing. At follow-up a week later, it emerged that being given a tape had no effect on adherence with GPs' advice, nor on anxiety about conditions. CONCLUSION: Providing patients with an audiotape of their GP consultation was positively rated by many patients. Although there were no detectable clinical effects at follow-up, the technique merits further evaluation in general practice.     

Does Supplementary Prenatal Nursing and Home Visitation Support Improve Resource Use in a Universal Health Care System? A Randomized Controlled Trial in Canada

ABSTRACT: Background: The addition of supplementary prenatal support may improve the health and well‐being of high‐risk women and families. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to examine the impact of supplementary prenatal care on resource use among a community‐based population of pregnant women. Methods: Pregnant women from three urban maternity clinics were randomized (a) to current standard of physician care, (b) to current standard of care plus consultation with a nurse, or (c) to (b) plus consultation with a home visitor. Participants were 1,352 women who received 3 telephone interviews. The primary outcome was resource use (e.g., attended prenatal classes, used nutritional counseling). Results: Overall, those in the nurse intervention group were more likely to attend an “Early Bird” prenatal class and parenting classes, and to use nutrition counseling and agencies that assist with child care. Women provided with extra nursing and home visitation supports were more likely to use a written resource guide, nutrition counseling, and agencies that assist with child care. Among women at higher risk (e.g., language barriers, young maternal age, low income), the nurse intervention significantly increased use of early prenatal classes, whereas the nurse and home visitor intervention significantly increased use of the written resource guide and nutrition counseling. The intervention substantially increased the amount of information received on numerous pregnancy‐related topics but had little impact on resource use for mental health and poverty‐related needs. Among those with added support, resource use among low‐risk women was generally greater than among high‐risk women. Conclusions: Additional support provided by nurses, or nurses and home visitors, can successfully address informational needs and increase the likelihood that women will use existing community‐based resources. This finding was true even for high‐risk women, although this intervention did not reduce the difference in resource use between high‐ and low‐risk women. (BIRTH 33:3 September 2006)     

Calcium mass transfer in peritoneal dialysis patients using 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate.

Standard peritoneal dialysate has a relatively high calcium concentration of 3.5 mEq/l. Peritoneal dialysis patients thus gain calcium from the dialysate which contributes to the risk of hypercalcemia. Dialysate with 2.5 mEq/l calcium is now available. Theoretically, using dialysate with this calcium content, calcium transfer should be negative (from the patient into the dialysate) when the patient is hypercalcemic, and positive when the patient is normocalcemic or hypercalcemic. Thus, 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate may allow larger doses of calcium carbonate to be prescribed. We compared calcium mass transfer (CMT) in 17 stable peritoneal dialysis patients using 3.5 and 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate. A solution of 2.05 l, 1.5 g/dl dextrose was dwelled for 4 hours. Calcium was measured in the drained dialysate and serum (total and ionized). Mean CMT was 0.7 +/- 0.5 mEq/exchange using 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate and -0.9 +/- 0.9 mEq/exchange using 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate (p less than 0.0001). At the time of the CMT studies, the mean serum ionized calcium levels were identical for the two groups (2.6 mEq/l). CMT correlated inversely with serum total calcium, serum ionized calcium, and drained dialysate volume. During hypercalcemia calcium transfer was from the dialysate to the patient when 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used, but from the patient to the dialysate when 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used. We conclude that 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate is effective in removing calcium and will be helpful in preventing hypercalcemia when large doses of oral calcium compounds are prescribed as a phosphate binder.     

Effects of Pravastatin on Plasma Lipid Concentrations in Poloxamer 407-Induced Hyperlipidemic Rats

A new animal model of hyperlipidemia is being developed using the nonionic surfactant poloxamer 407 (P-407). We investigated the impact of pravastatin on P-407-induced hyperlipidemia. Twenty rats received P-407 300 mg intraperitoneally to induce hyperlipidemia, and 20 control rats received saline injection. Pravastatin was administered orally to an equal number of rats in both groups using three different regimens. A fourth group did not receive pravastatin. At 24 hours after injection, total cholesterol levels in two of the pravastatin groups were 28% and 34% lower than those in animals that did not receive pravastatin (p≤0.01). At 48 hours, triglyceride levels were significantly lower in all pravastatin groups (21–44%) versus animals not receiving pravastatin. Pravastatin diminished the effects of P-407 on lipoproteins. This new animal model may be useful in screening for investigational antihyperlipidemic agents.     

Infratentorial subdural empyema: clinical and computerized tomography findings. Report of three cases

Infratentorial subdural empyemas are rare. The authors report three cases encountered between 1979 and 1988, representing a 3% incidence among all subdural empyemas. The common source was an ear infection. Clinical presentation encompassed a systemic febrile illness, headaches, and a stiff neck. Only one patient had an inconspicuous focal neurological deficit that suggested a cerebral location. Initial diagnosis was acute meningitis in each case. A lumbar puncture was ordered in all three cases but was actually performed in two without developing tonsillar herniation. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis confirmed the diagnosis of meningitis in one but was normal in the other. Computerized tomography allowed a precise diagnosis and localization of the pathology. All three patients received aggressive antibiotic therapy plus suboccipital craniectomy and aspiration of pus; catheter drainage was performed in two. Cultures were positive in one case and negative in the others. Two patients were cured without sequelae; the third patient was moribund at surgery and died. Although it is known that subdural empyemas may localize in the posterior fossa, only one previous report was found. Infratentorial subdural empyema may sometimes be an unrecognized companion of acute meningitis and is cured with antibiotic therapy alone.     

Confidants' feedback and traumatic life events

One hundred six undergraduate (83 women and 23 men) completed surveys concerning their most traumatic life event, the feedback they received following their disclosure of the event to others, and how they felt after the disclosure. Results indicated that the better they felt after disclosure, the less disturbed they were by thoughts of the event at the time of the study. In addition, the more personal the trauma was, the worse they felt after their disclosure, and the more disturbed they were about the trauma. However, no significant relation existed between the positivity (e.g., supportiveness) of their confidant's feedback and their present degree of disturbance. Implications for understanding the complex relation between confiding traumatic events and resolving feelings surrounding those events were discussed.