Calbindin D-28k distribution in odontoblasts underneath tertiary dentine in human carious teeth

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the calbindin D-28k immunoreactivity in carious teeth to know whether this protein may have a function in tertiary dentine formation. METHODS: Human extracted teeth with or without carious lesions were immersion-fixed with Zamboni fixative, demineralized in 4.13% EDTA solution (pH 7.4), frozen-sectioned, and processed for calbindin immunoreactivity and hematoxylin-eosin stain. The intensity of the immunostaining was evaluated by quantitative densitometry. RESULTS: In intact teeth, numerous odontoblasts were aligned underneath the secondary dentine and their cell bodies showed the immunoreactivity. In carious teeth, tertiary dentine had poor- or rich tubular patterns under the carious lesion. Underneath the tubule-poor tertiary dentine, distinct odontoblasts could not be seen at the central site. However, some cells with a flat appearance were located at this site and were immunonegative for calbindin D-28k. On the other hand, columnar odontoblasts were seen at the peripheral site, and their cell bodies and processes showed strong immunoreactivity. Underneath the tubule-rich tertiary dentine, columnar odontoblasts were abundantly distributed, and the strong immunoreactivity was observed in their cell bodies and processes. The immunoreactivity in odontoblasts underneath the tertiary dentine with poor or rich tubular pattern was more intense than that for the secondary dentine in intact teeth (P<0.05). On the other hand, the intensity of the immunoreactivity in odontoblasts was similar underneath the secondary dentine in intact and carious teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that calbidin D-28k was actively synthesised by odontoblasts under the carious lesion. These findings may suggest that this protein plays an important role in the tertiary dentine formation.     

Recalibration improves inter-examiner reliability of TMD examination

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether recalibration of examiners would improve the reliability of gathering clinical findings and related diagnoses of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in accordance with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two clinicians independently examined a total of 48 symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects according to the RDC/TMD on two occasions: examination 1 (E1). Aarhus, Denmark (n=24; 18 female, ages 18-59 years); examination 2 (E2). Malm?, Sweden (n=24; 18 female, ages 18-86 years). The clinicians were calibrated in the use of the RDC/TMD Axis-I examination on the day before E1. Six months later, they were recalibrated on the day before E2. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to examine the inter-examiner reliability of the two clinicians on the two occasions (E1, E2). RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficients of vertical range of jaw motion differed little between E1 and E2. At E2, all other examination components consistently improved in reliability relative to E1. Similar improvements were seen for the frequently occurring RDC/TMD clinical diagnoses: Ia. Myofascial pain [ICC = 0.83 (E1) and 1.00 (E2)], IIa. Disk displacement with reduction [ICC = 0.26 (E1) and 0.64 (E2)], and IIIa. Arthralgia [ICC = 0.16 (E1) and 0.73 (E2)]. CONCLUSION: Recalibration considerably improved inter-examiner reliability for assessing RDC/TMD clinical variables and diagnoses, which are critically dependent on reliable assessment of clinical signs; improvement was most marked when initial inter-examiner reliability was low. Final inter-examiner reliabilities after recalibration were all associated with acceptable to excellent levels.     

Comparison of preoperative pain and medication use in emergency patients presenting with irreversible pulpitis or teeth with necrotic pulps

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study compared differences in preoperative pain and medication use in patients with moderate to severe pain who sought emergency endodontic care for teeth with irreversible pulpitis and for symptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 323 patients seeking emergency endodontic treatment completed questionnaires regarding their biographical information, pain, pain history, and medications. Teeth were tested for vitality, mobility, percussion, and palpation pain. Lymphadenopathy was also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with irreversible pulpitis waited significantly (P <.05) longer before seeking emergency care (9 days vs 4 days) than patients with symptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps. No differences (P >.05) were found between the groups in terms of analgesic or antibiotic use and pain relief from preoperative narcotic medications. Nonnarcotic analgesics were reported to significantly reduce pain more often in patients with symptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps. There were sex differences in the group of patients with irreversible pulpitis: More women than men were taking analgesic medications and, in the group having symptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps, more men than women reported pain relief from their analgesic medications. CONCLUSION: Patients with irreversible pulpitis wait longer to seek emergency treatment. A majority (81%-83%) of emergency patients with moderate to severe pain will have taken some type of medication(s) to help control their pain, and more women than men with irreversible pulpitis will take an analgesic. By taking their preoperative medication(s), this group of patients will get relief 62% to 65% of the time; furthermore, more men than women with symptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps will experience pain relief.     

Serum mepivacaine concentrations after intraoral injection in young children

The authors measured plasma concentrations of mepivacaine in 36 children from the ages of 2 to 5 years who received dental care under light general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 2 percent mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:20,000 levonordefrin or 3 percent mepivacaine hydrochloride without vasoconstrictor. The volume of anesthetic injected depended on the planned procedures for each patient. Blood samples (3 mL) were drawn from an intravenous line before and 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after mepivacaine injection. The serum was collected and analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography. Mean serum concentrations, normalized to a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight, reached a peak of 0.67 +/- 0.42 microgram/mL (mean +/- SD) after 3 percent mepivacaine and 0.63 +/- 0.21 microgram/mL after 2 percent mepivacaine with levonordefrin. Levonordefrin had no significant effect on the plasma concentrations. However, because of the higher concentration of mepivacaine in the 3 percent formulation, it was potentially 1.5 times as toxic (P < 0.002) on a volume basis. Statistical analysis also suggested that the maximum recommended dose of 3 mg/lb could result in potentially toxic blood concentrations in a small percentage of pediatric patients. The authors conclude that 3 percent mepivacaine should not be used when relatively large volumes of local anesthetic must be administered to small children and recommend that the maximum dose of mepivacaine not exceed 5 mg/kg.     

Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical trial examined the effect on teeth and implants when rigidly or non-rigidly connected in a cross-arch model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients received 2 implants, 1 on each side of the mandible, and were restored with 3-unit fixed partial dentures connected either rigidly or non-rigidly to an abutment tooth. Patients were followed for at least 5 years post-restoration. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis revealed no significant difference in crestal bone loss at implants (rigid versus non-rigid methods). An overall significant difference (P < .001) was found comparing methods for teeth. Paired t tests revealed no significant differences in crestal bone levels for implants or teeth at the 5-year recall. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox proportional hazards model showed no differences between attachment methods with regard to success based on survival and bone loss criteria. During the 5-year recall period, 1 implant (rigid side) was removed. Four implants developed bone loss greater than 2 mm during the course of this trial. One tooth on the rigid side and 2 teeth on the non-rigid side had greater than 2 mm of crestal bone loss and were removed secondary to fractures. In all, 5 abutment teeth were removed, all of which had been treated with root canal therapy and fractured at the interface of the post within the tooth. There was no clear relationship of tooth fracture to attachment. Repeated-measures analysis of mobility values revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study, and paired t tests revealed no statistically significant differences between implants for mobility. Repeated-measures analysis and paired t tests for probing depth revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study. There were no significant differences in soft tissue indices for either attachment method. The percentage of patients who had measurable intrusion was 66% for the non-rigid group, and 44% for the rigid group; 25% of the non-rigid teeth had greater than 0.5 mm intrusion, compared with 12.5% for the rigid group. For the 2 time periods evaluated, there was no significant increase in intrusion over time. The non-rigid-side implant required more nonscheduled visits to treat problems than the rigid implant and the teeth. Discussion: Most patients were treated successfully with rigid or non-rigid attachment of implants to teeth. CONCLUSION: The high incidence of intrusion and non-scheduled patient visits suggest that alternative treatments without connecting implants to teeth may be indicated.     

A 5 yr clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars

An examination of 5616 endodontically treated and retreated maxillary first and second molars was made in an attempt to determine the percentage of MB2 canals that could be located routinely, and evaluate if there were any significant differences between initial treatments and retreatments. The teeth examined were 3578 first molars and 2038 second molars treated consecutively over a 5-yr period by six endodontists. Overall the MB2 canal was found in 2133 (60%) first molars, and 712 (35%) second molars. The incidence of a MB2 canal in first molar retreatments was 66% compared to a 58% incidence in initial treatments. Whereas in second molars the retreatment incidence was 40% compared to 34% in initial treatments. The significant difference in the incidence of a MB2 canal between initial treatments and retreatments suggests that failure to find and treat existing MB2 canals will decrease the long-term prognosis.     

Advocacy training in US advanced pediatric dentistry training programs

PURPOSE: This study: (1) assessed pediatric dentistry residency program directors' attitudes toward and involvement in advocacy training; and (2) identified types and extent of advocacy training in U.S. pediatric dentistry programs. METHODS: Between October 2005 and February 2006, all 66 pediatric dentistry residency program directors were invited to complete a 62-item online questionnaire. The survey investigated: (1) directors' attitudes toward advocacy training; (2) nature of advocacy training offered during residency; (3) extent of resident involvement in different settings; and (4) directors' involvement in advocacy. RESULTS: Forty-two program directors responded (64%). Overall, respondents agreed that advocacy by pediatric dentists for children beyond the dental office was important and that residency programs should provide advocacy training. Most programs did not routinely offer advocacy opportunities in nonclinical settings. Over half of programs required community outreach clinic rotations for all residents. One third offered didactic curriculum in the legislative process. Over 50% of program directors reported personal involvement in legislative oral health lobbying within 3 years, but fewer than a third were involved with professional political action committees (PACs). CONCLUSIONS: Advocacy is seen as on important in pediatric dentistry but variation in attitudes of program directors and program offerings exists in US training programs.