Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: oral and craniofacial phenotypes

Objective:  Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare early-onset accelerated senescence syndrome. In HGPS, a recently identified de novo dominant mutation of the lamin A gene ( LMNA ) produces abnormal lamin A, resulting in compromised nuclear membrane integrity. Clinical features include sclerotic skin, cardiovascular and bone abnormalities, and marked growth retardation. Craniofacial features include 'bird-like' facies, alopecia, craniofacial disproportion, and dental crowding. Our prospective study describes dental, oral soft tissue, and craniofacial bone features in HGPS.
Methods:  Fifteen patients with confirmed p.G608G LMNA mutation (1–17 years, seven males, eight females) received comprehensive oral evaluations. Anomalies of oral soft tissue, gnathic bones, and dentition were identified.
Results:  Radiographic findings included hypodontia ( n  = 7), dysmorphic teeth ( n  = 5), steep mandibular angles ( n  = 11), and thin basal bone ( n  = 11). Soft tissue findings included ogival palatal arch ( n  = 8), median sagittal palatal fissure ( n  = 7), and ankyloglossia ( n  = 7). Calculated dental ages (9 months to 11 years 2 months) were significantly lower than chronological ages (1 year 6 months to 17 years 8 months) ( P  = 0.002). Eleven children manifested a shorter mandibular body, anterior/posterior cranial base and ramus, but a larger gonial angle, compared to age/gender/race norms.
Conclusion:  Novel oral-craniofacial phenotypes and quantification of previously reported features are presented. Our findings expand the HGPS phenotype and provide additional insight into the complex pathogenesis of HGPS.     

Ecstasy cannot be assumed to be 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDMA)

LINKED ARTICLES

This is a rebuttal by the authors (Green et al., pp. 1523–1536 of this issue) to a commentary by Parrott, pp. 1518–1520 of this issue. To view the article by Green et al. visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01819.x. To view the commentary by Parrott visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01941.xWe thank Prof Parrott (Parrott 2012) for his interest in our review (Green et al., 2012). Our main aim was to discuss the problems that arise in interpreting data obtained when administering 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) to experimental animals in terms of possible clinical consequences and vice versa, not to disparage the evidence that Ecstasy is neurotoxic in humans. We presented evidence that the pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and primates are fundamentally different from the pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans. Because the plasma half-life of the drug in rats is 10 times shorter than in humans, the acute adverse events in rats may be minimal compared with those in humans, and this includes body temperature and endocrine changes. Conversely, the rapid metabolism of the drug in rats to form neurotoxic metabolites may result in more severe long-term effects in that species than those that may occur in humans.We had no intention of suggesting that there was no evidence for some recreational Ecstasy users presenting with evidence of 5-HT neurotoxicity, albeit it is clear from the literature that some of this evidence remains open to several interpretations. What we did claim was that pure 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) taken alone was unlikely to cause 5-HT neurotoxicity in man. Here we must emphasize the term MDMA, as it is crucial to our discussion. Parrott, in contrast, uses the term ‘Ecstasy/MDMA’ several times when discussing neurotoxicity (Parrott, 2012). This association of Ecstasy with MDMA is one of the major problems of translation that we addressed. The Ecstasy tablet that most recreational users buy and ingest is not necessarily MDMA. Indeed, in many cases, it clearly is not. The tablet is often adulterated with other compounds, and one investigation identified no less than 14 substances other than MDMA in Ecstasy tablets, which users nevertheless presumably believed contained only MDMA (Vogels et al., 2009). Many of the adulterants identified were also psychoactive and included compounds structurally related to MDMA such as 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine and 2-methylamino-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)butane, which have poorly researched pharmacology and toxicology. In addition, most recreational users of Ecstasy also knowingly ingest other psychoactive compounds such as alcohol and cannabis. Alcohol, for example, alters the pharmacokinetics of MDMA (Hamida et al., 2009). While, as Parrott states, clinical studies have attempted to allow for these confounding factors in any examination of the physical and psychological effects of MDMA in humans, such analysis is always limited not only by the other compounds the evaluators are unaware of, but also drugs perhaps not even considered to be relevant by the user and therefore not disclosed. It is unlikely that coffee and ‘energy drinks’ such as Red Bull are always disclosed, but there is now good preclinical evidence that caffeine, which incidentally has also been found as an adulterant in Ecstasy tablets, enhances both the hyperthermia and neurotoxicity induced in rats by MDMA (Camarasa et al., 2006; Vanattou-Saïfoudine et al., 2010). And this brings us to the crux of the problem and weakness of all the clinical data cited by Parrott (2012). A basic tenet of all good clinical pharmacology is accurate knowledge of the doses administered, frequency of administration and any confounding factors such as other drugs being consumed. None of these data are available with any precision in the clinical studies quoted. Of course one has some indication as to dose (although as Vogels et al., (2009) reported, the dose contained in illicitly obtained tablets is highly variable) and frequency of drug ingestion, but this information is generally obtained from the user whose recall is likely to be limited or who decides to obfuscate. Crucially, the information can never take into account the problem of drug tablet adulteration. The fact that hair or urine samples detect MDMA merely shows the user has consumed the drug, not how much or when or what other drugs were taken concurrently.We never suggested that MDMA exposure was not going to be associated with physical or psychological change. However such changes are not necessarily associated with long-term neurotoxic damage. We have shown that long-term behavioural effects can occur in rats both with and without 5-HT neurotoxicity (Fone et al., 2002; Bull et al., 2003; Rodsiri et al., 2011). It is interesting that Parrott approvingly quotes the Verheyden et al. (2003) study in support of his contention that neurotoxic damage has occurred. Because this study noted that the majority of persons reporting chronic psychiatric problems reported ‘improved mental health’ after quitting the drug, this surely allows us to conclude that the drug had produced subacute changes rather than any that could be associated with long-term neurotoxic damage.A further limitation to any clinical study is that one cannot perform prospective studies with the aim of investigating whether long-term neurotoxic events occur, so weaknesses arise with regard to any psychological abnormalities observed. Are persons with high risk of psychiatric problems more likely to misuse the drug, or does the drug induce changes in high-risk individuals? If high risk also happened to be associated with 5-HT abnormalities in the brains, then any conclusion that MDMA has induced neurotoxicity is spurious.We most certainly did not suggest that MDMA acted as a neurotoxin only under conditions of severe hyperthermia as is stated by Parrot in his sixth paragraph (Parrott, 2012). We have been involved in many studies on the effects of MDMA on body temperature in rats (see Docherty and Green, 2010) including one that demonstrated that neurotoxicity can occur in the absence of hyperthermia (O''Shea et al., 1998) and another that showed that hyperthermia worsens neurotoxic damage (Green et al., 2004). In our review, what we did propose was that because of the very different pharmacokinetics of MDMA in rats and humans, it is probable that humans would suffer serious or fatal adverse events at plasma levels below those likely to be required to induce 5-HT neurotoxicity.We emphasize again that we are not denying the clinical observations reviewed by Parrott, but conclude that the effects seen cannot be ascribed solely to the effects of MDMA, as he seems to be proposing. We also repeat our contention that MDMA in combination with other drugs may induce neurotoxicity and this could be said to be supported by the clinical studies quoted by Parrott.Finally, we can but assume that Parrott concurs with our principal conclusion that ‘the doses currently being used to investigate the possible therapeutic benefits of MDMA are unlikely to produce any severe acute or importantly any long-term neurotoxic damage in the human brain’ as he used such a dose (100 mg or approximately 1.4 mg·kg ⁻¹) in one of his recent studies in human volunteers (Parrott et al., 2011).     

脑缺氧是影响严重颅脑创伤患者短期预后的独立危险因素(英文)

Background:Brain hypoxia(BH)can aggravate outcome after severe traumatic brain injury(TBI).Whether BH or reduced brain oxygen(Pbto2)is an independent outcome predictor or a marker of disease severity is not fully elucidated.Objective To analyze the relationship between Pbto2,intracranial pressure(ICP),and cerebral perfusion pressure(CPP)and to examine whether BH correlates with worse outcome independently of ICP and CPP.Methods We studied103patients monitored     

The observation on different effectiveness between the embedding needle therapy and medication in the preventative treatment of chronic migraine

Objective

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of the embedding needle therapy in the preventative treatment of chronic migraine.

The M-OVIN study: does switching treatment to FSH and / or IUI lead to higher pregnancy rates in a subset of women with world health organization type II anovulation not conceiving after six ovulatory cycles with clomiphene citrate – a randomised controlled trial

Background

Clomiphene citrate (CC) is first line treatment in women with World Health Organization (WHO) type II anovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Whereas 60% to 85% of these women will ovulate on CC, only about one half will have conceived after six cycles. If women do not conceive, treatment can be continued with gonadotropins or intra-uterine insemination (IUI). At present, it is unclear for how many cycles ovulation induction with CC should be repeated, and when to switch to ovulation induction with gonadotropins and/or IUI.

Methods/Design

We started a multicenter randomised controlled trial in the Netherlands comparing six cycles of CC plus intercourse or six cycles of gonadotrophins plus intercourse or six cycles of CC plus IUI or six cycles of gonadotrophins plus IUI.Women with WHO type II anovulation who ovulate but did not conceive after six ovulatory cycles of CC with a maximum of 150 mg daily for five days will be included.Our primary outcome is birth of a healthy child resulting from a pregnancy that was established in the first eight months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and treatment costs. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Two comparisons will be made, one in which CC is compared to gonadotrophins and one in which the addition of IUI is compared to ovulation induction only. Assuming a live birth rate of 40% after CC, 55% after addition of IUI and 55% after ovulation induction with gonadotrophins, with an alpha of 5% and a power of 80%, we need to recruit 200 women per arm (800 women in total).An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee has criticized the data of the first 150 women and concluded that a sample size re-estimation should be performed after including 320 patients (i.e. 80 per arm).

Discussion

The trial will provide evidence on the most effective, safest and most cost effective treatment in women with WHO type II anovulation who do not conceive after six ovulatory cycles with CC with a maximum of 150 mg daily for five days. This evidence could imply the need for changing our guidelines, which may cause a shift in large practice variation to evidence based primary treatment for these women.

Trial registration number

Netherlands Trial register NTR1449

     

Predicting serious bacterial infection in young children with fever without apparent source

The aim of this study was to design a clinical rule to predict the presence of a serious bacterial infection in children with fever without apparent source. Information was collected from the records of children aged 1-36 mo who attended the paediatric emergency department because of fever without source (temperature > or = 38 degrees C and no apparent source found after evaluation by a general practitioner or history by a paediatrician). Serious bacterial infection included bacterial meningitis, sepsis, bacteraemia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bacterial gastroenteritis, osteomyelitis and ethmoiditis. Using multivariate logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC area), the diagnostic value of predictors for serious bacterial infection was judged, resulting in a risk stratification. Twenty-five percent of the 231 patients enrolled in the study (mean age 1.1 y) had a serious bacterial infection. Independent predictors from history and examination included duration of fever, poor micturition, vomiting, age, temperature < 36.7 degrees C or > or = 40 degrees C at examination, chest-wall retractions and poor peripheral circulation (ROC area: 0.75). Independent predictors from laboratory tests were white blood cell count, serum C-reactive protein and the presence of >70 white blood cells in urinalysis (ROC area: 0.83). The risk stratification for serious bacterial infection ranged from 6% to 92%. CONCLUSION: The probability of a serious bacterial infection in the individual patient with fever without source can be estimated more precisely by using a limited number of symptoms, signs and laboratory tests.