The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled human clinical pilot trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of using rhBMP-2/collagen as a substitute for autogenous bone graft inside interbody fusion cages to achieve arthrodesis in humans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preclinical studies have shown rhBMP-2 to be an effective substitute for autogenous bone graft, but there are no studies to date documenting such efficacy for human spine fusion. METHODS: Fourteen patients with single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease refractory to nonoperative management were randomized to receive lumbar interbody arthrodesis with a tapered cylindrical threaded fusion cage filled with rhBMP-2/collagen sponge or autogenous iliac crest bone. Patients were evaluated with radiographs, sagittally reformatted computed tomography scans, and Short Form-36 and Oswestry outcome questionnaires. RESULTS: All 11 patients who received rhBMP-2 were judged by three independent radiologists to have solid fusions (at 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation), whereas only 2 of the 3 control patients, who received the standard treatment of autogenous iliac crest bone, were deemed to be fused. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores of the rhBMP-2 group improved sooner (after 3 months) than those of the autograft group, with both groups demonstrating similar improvement at 6 months. Short Form 36 scores continued to improve up to 24 months. CONCLUSION: The arthrodesis was found to occur more reliably in patients treated with rhBMP-2-filled fusion cages than in controls treated with autogenous bone graft, although the sample size was limited. There were no adverse events related to the rhBMP-2 treatment. This study is one of the first to show consistent and unequivocal osteoinduction by a recombinant growth factor in-humans.     

Importance of studying the contributions of early adverse experience to neurobiological findings in depression.

Almost four decades of intensive research have sought to elucidate the neurobiological bases of depression. Epidemiological studies have revealed that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk for depression. Adverse early-life experiences influence neurobiological systems within genetic limits, leading to the neurobiological and behavioral manifestations of depression. We summarize the burgeoning evidence concerning a pre-eminent role of early adverse experience in the pathogenesis of depression. The available data suggest that (1) early adverse experience contributes to the pathophysiology of depression, (2) there are neurobiologically different subtypes of depression depending on the presence or absence of early adverse experience, likely having confounded previous research on the neurobiology of depression, and (3) early adverse experience likely influences treatment response in depression. Classification of depression based on developmental and neurobiological features will likely considerably improve future research in the field of depression, and might lead to optimized treatment strategies that directly target different neurobiological pathways to depression.     

Cancer beyond organ and tissue specificity: Next‐generation‐sequencing gene mutation data reveal complex genetic similarities across major cancers

Cancer medicine relies on the paradigm that cancer is an organ‐ and tissue‐specific disease, which is the basis for classifying tumors. With the extensive genomic information now available on tumors it is possible to conduct analyses to reveal common genetic features across cancer types and to explore whether the established anatomy‐based tumor classification is actually reflected on the genetic level, which might provide important guides to new therapeutic directions. Here, we have conducted an extensive analysis of the genetic similarity of tumors from 14 major cancer entities using somatic mutation data from 4,796 cases available through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on all available genes as well as different cancer‐related gene sets. Our analysis provides a systematic account of the genetic similarity network for major cancer types and shows that in about 43% of the cases on average, tumors of a particular anatomic site are genetically more similar to tumors from different organs and tissues (trans‐similarity) than to tumors of the same origin (self‐similarity). The observed similarities exist not only for carcinomas from different sites but are also present among neoplasms from different tissue origin, such as melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and glioblastoma. The current WHO cancer classification is therefore reflected on the genetic level by only about 57% of the tumors. These results provide a rationale to reconsider organ‐ and tissue‐specificity in cancer and contribute to the discussion about whether personalized therapies targeting specific genetic alterations may be transferred to cancers from other anatomic sites with similar genetic properties.     

Quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics on serial tumor biopsies from a sorafenib-treated HCC patient

Compensatory signaling pathways in tumors confer resistance to targeted therapy, but the pathways and their mechanisms of activation remain largely unknown. We describe a procedure for quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics on snap-frozen biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and matched nontumor liver tissue. We applied this procedure to monitor signaling pathways in serial biopsies taken from an HCC patient before and during treatment with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. At diagnosis, the patient had an advanced HCC. At the time of the second biopsy, abdominal imaging revealed progressive disease despite sorafenib treatment. Sorafenib was confirmed to inhibit MAPK signaling in the tumor, as measured by reduced ribosomal protein S6 kinase phosphorylation. Hierarchical clustering and enrichment analysis revealed pathways broadly implicated in tumor progression and resistance, such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cell adhesion pathways. Thus, we describe a protocol for quantitative analysis of oncogenic pathways in HCC biopsies and obtained first insights into the effect of sorafenib in vivo. This protocol will allow elucidation of mechanisms of resistance and enable precision medicine.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health concern with an estimated 750,000 new cases per year (1). In more than 80% of cases, HCC arises in a setting of liver cirrhosis mainly of alcoholic or viral origin (2). The prognosis for HCC patients is poor, with less than 30% qualifying for curative treatments such as tumor resection or liver transplantation (2). Median survival time of patients that cannot be treated surgically is less than 1 y. Sorafenib is the only approved targeted therapy for HCC, prolonging median patient survival by ∼3 mo (3). Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor of Raf (B and C), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) (4), which presumably inhibits not only tumor cells but also endothelial cells responsible for tumor vascularization.Resistance to a targeted cancer drug can be intrinsic or adaptive (5). Sorafenib is largely cytostatic (6), suggesting that intrinsic resistance is more common in tumors, although some reports describe tumor shrinkage upon sorafenib treatment (7). Studies involving HCC cell lines or immunohistochemical staining of tumor sections revealed that sorafenib resistance correlates with the up-regulation of several signaling pathways, including the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway as assayed by S6 S235/236 (8) and Akt S473 phosphorylation (9). Other potential resistance mechanisms involve epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and autophagy (10, 11). However, the molecular mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in patients are largely unknown. Understanding the pathways that confer intrinsic or adaptive resistance would allow precision medicine and increase treatment efficacy.Proteomic analysis allows the identification of drug targets for cancer treatment and biomarkers for cancer classification or recurrence. In particular, MS is a powerful tool for resolving the complexity of cancer signaling pathways. With regard to HCC, qualitative proteomics has been performed on resected tumor material (12), laser-capture microdissected material from tissue sections (13, 14), and primary hepatocytes or serum derived from patients (15, 16). These studies (17, 18) identified HCC biomarkers such as glutamine synthetase and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) that are currently in use for diagnosis (19, 20). Quantitative proteomics has been performed on HCC resected tissue and serum (21, 22). Recently, proteomics has been performed on tumor biopsies of renal cell carcinoma patients (23). Several studies also have described phosphoproteomic analyses of resected HCC or other cancer material (24–26), in some cases quantifying up to 8,000 phosphorylated sites (hereafter referred to as “phosphosites”) starting with 2 mg of protein (18, 27–30). However, to our knowledge, quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics, hereafter collectively referred to as “(phospho)proteomics,” have yet to be performed on tumor biopsies, possibly because biopsy material is nonrenewable and typically provides only a very small amount of protein. Importantly, quantitative (phospho)proteomics on serial biopsies taken before and during treatment has not been described. We note that although a biopsy procedure generates less material than a resection, it has the important advantage of capturing normally dynamic properties of a tumor, such as the phosphorylation status of signaling pathways. Biopsies are immediately snap-frozen upon removal from the patient and, unlike resected tissue, are obtained without causing ischemia or hypoglycemia in the collected tissue. Needle biopsies are taken routinely to diagnose and stage the disease. Another important consideration is a method to perform quantitative (phospho)proteomics, such as super-SILAC (“SILAC” is an acronym for “stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture”), that allows direct comparison of biopsies obtained at different times or from different patients (31).We describe quantitative (phospho)proteomic analyses of needle biopsies of HCC and matched nontumor tissue from a human patient. These analyses provide a global snapshot of signaling pathways in the biopsy material. Analyzing serial biopsies taken from a patient before and during therapy, we measured differences in signaling pathways between tumor and matched nontumor control tissue and the changes in these signaling pathways upon sorafenib treatment. Our findings provide insight into mechanisms of tumor progression and resistance to cancer therapy.     

Recognition of a positive MLR within 4 hours using a carrier free electrophoresis system

Summary Indicator cells — tanned, surface stabilized sheep erythrocytes — were incubated for 1 h in supernatants of 3 h MLCs. Their electrophoretic mobility was measured by an analytical, carrier free electrophoresis system. The change in their mobility compared with an appropriate control was calculated in per cent and correlated with the conventional measured MLR-cpm. The correlation of the two quantities is statistically highly significant (p<0.01). Furthermore, the difference of the electrophoretic mobility values of the group of HLA-D-identical and the groups of HLA-D-haploidentical or -different donors is significant beyond the 1 level (p<0.0005). Our method enables, therefore recognition of a positive or negative MLC after only 4 h. Typing for HLA-D-determinants seems to be possible. This could be of great importance for histocompatibility testing and organ transplantation.     

Role of allogeneic transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has changed dramatically during the past decade. It was the standard of care for all younger CML patients with a compatible donor before the introduction of imatinib. It is used now as a rescue treatment for patients for whom tyrosine kinase inhibitors have failed. Both treatments, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and allogeneic transplantation, are very powerful and able to control the disease in the long-term. It is therefore of great importance to know the place of each therapy and to integrate allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a risk-adapted way into the treatment plan of each individual patient.