Updated Treatment Guidelines for Gonorrhea Infections

Gonorrhea is the second most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States. It continues to be a major cause of morbidity for women and has been linked to infertility and pelvic inflammatory disease. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revised the current treatment guidelines for gonorrhea in response to the rising rates of antibiotic resistance. This column will discuss the new guidelines, including the rationale for the change as well as nursing implications to support timely and effective treatment of gonorrhea.     

Sexual activity and function in women with and without pelvic floor disorders

Introduction and hypothesis

We describe differences in sexual activity and function in women with and without pelvic floor disorders (PFDs).

Methods

Heterosexual women ≥40 years of age who presented to either urogynecology or general gynecology clinics at 11 clinical sites were recruited. Women were asked if they were sexually active with a male partner. Validated questionnaires and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations assessed urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Sexual activity and function was measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Student’s t test was used to assess continuous variables; categorical variables were assessed with Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) on FSFI total and domain scores.

Results

Five hundred and five women met eligibility requirements and gave consent for participation. Women with and without PFDs did not differ in race, body mass index (BMI), comorbid medical conditions, or hormone use. Women with PFDs were slightly older than women without PFDs (55.6?+?10.8 vs. 51.6?+?8.3 years, P <0.001); all analyses were controlled for age. Women with PFDs were as likely to be sexually active as women without PFDs (61.6 vs. 75.5 %, P?=?0.09). There was no difference in total FSFI scores between cohorts (23.2?+?8.5 vs. 24.4?+?9.2, P?=?0.23) or FSFI domain scores (all P?=?NS).

Conclusion

Rates of sexual activity and function are not different between women with and without PFDs.     

Measurement of Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Utilizing the Quality of Life Radiation Therapy Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) measures give patients the possibility to express subjective changes in wellbeing. We aimed to translate the radiation specific quality of life questionnaire (QOL-RTI) and the companion head and neck module (H&N) questionnaire into German and to test its reliability, validity and sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After translation and final revisions based on qualitative interviews with ten patients, 97 head and neck cancer patients were screened for eligibility. Patients answered the 38 items questionnaire at baseline and twice in week 4 of radiotherapy for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was calculated using Chronbach's alpha. Patients also completed the functional assessment of cancer tool plus head and neck (FACT-G plus H&N) for concurrent validity. Item analyses were performed to test the sensitivity. RESULTS: Chronbach's alpha yielded alpha = 0.85 for the QOL-RTI and alpha = 0.80 for the H&N module, test-retest reliability scores were r = 0.87 and r = 0.83, respectively. The correlation of the QOL-RTI plus H&N and the FACT plus H&N was r = 0.79. Questionnaire sensitivity was supported by significant changes in the mean score of 45.8% of the QOL-RTI items and 78.6% of the H&N items between baseline and week 4 of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the QOL-RTI was shown to be a reliable, valid and sensitive tool to assess the quality of life of patients undergoing radiotherapy. The H&N module is useful for patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer.     

Dynamic,contrast-enhanced CT of human brain tumors: quantitative assessment of blood volume,blood flow,and microvascular permeability: report of two cases

We present two patients with metastatic brain tumors who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT that yielded estimates of blood volume, blood flow, and microvascular permeability. For one patient, these CT-based quantifications were compared with contrast-enhanced MR-based assessments of fractional blood volume and permeability. Regional blood volume heterogeneity patterns were consistent between both CT- and MR imaging-based mapping. Permeability variations across the tumor, however, were less consistent, perhaps because of differences between ionic and non-ionic contrast agents. The advantages of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in comparison with dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging for microvascular quantifications are its availability and lower costs, applicability in the presence of MR imaging contraindications, and potentially more accurate analyses. The disadvantages are its limited anatomic coverage, radiation exposure, and the need for injection of a contrast agent.     

Telerehabilitation of anomia in primary progressive aphasia

Background: The efficacy of telerehabilitation-based treatment for anomia has been demonstrated in post-stroke aphasia, but the efficacy of this method of anomia treatment delivery has not been established within the context of degenerative illness.

Aims: The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a telerehabilitation-based approach to anomia treatment within the three subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA).

Methods & Procedures: Each of the three telerehabilitation participants represented a distinct subtype of PPA. Following a baseline evaluation of language and cognition, a phonological treatment and an orthographic treatment were administered to all participants over the course of 6 months. One month after the end of treatment, a post-treatment evaluation began. All treatment sessions and the majority of the evaluation sessions were administered via telerehabilitation. Treatment effects were examined within each subject, and treatment effects were also compared between each telerehabilitation participant and a group of in-person participants who had the same subtype of PPA.

Outcomes & Results: All three telerehabilitation participants exhibited positive treatment effects. CGR (nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA) and WCH (logopenic variant PPA) showed maintenance of naming for prophylaxis items under both treatment conditions, while ACR (semantic variant PPA) demonstrated increased naming of remediation items under the phonological treatment condition. Compared to in-person participants with the same subtype of PPA, each of the telerehabilitation participants typically showed effects that were either within the expected range or larger than expected.

Conclusions: Telerehabilitation-based anomia treatment is feasible and effective in all three subtypes of PPA.