Optimizing conventional therapies for inflammatory bowel disease

Conventional therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for most patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with only a minority of patients requiring biologic therapies. Recently, attention has focused on optimizing dosing strategies for biologic agents; however, of equal importance are recent advances in the optimization of conventional IBD therapies. Newer aminosalicylate formulations demonstrate similar efficacy with a reduced pill burden and less frequent dosing, while new corticosteroid preparations may retain efficacy with a significantly improved safety profile. The limited indications for antibiotics and probiotics have been further refined by recent data, although uncertainties remain. Advances in the understanding of thiopurine metabolism continue to improve dose optimization and the potential for deliberate therapeutic manipulation with adjunctive therapies. An improved knowledge of intracellular methotrexate metabolism may translate to similar opportunities in the future. This article discusses recent advances relevant to clinical practice today.     

Inaccuracies associated with the automated measurement of mean cell hemoglobin concentration in dehydrated cells

Because of discrepancies between electronically and manually measured values of mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) encountered in studies of pathologic red cells, we studied the effect of cell water content on MCHC measurements by both methods. A series of red cell samples with varying water contents (54%-164% normal) were prepared from normal cells using the antibiotic nystatin. MCHC was then measured, using the microhematocrit centrifuge and three different electronic cell counters in common laboratory use. For MCHC values above 36 g/dl as measured by the spun hematocrit method, all three electronic counters under estimmated the MCHC, with increasing error as the true MCHC increased. For MCHC values below 30 g/dl, the values from two conductivity based instruments agreed with those from the spun hematocrit method, whereas one instrument based on light scattering overestimated the MCHC. These results indicate that inaccuracies in the measured mean cell volume (MCV) of dehydrated or otherwise undeformable cells may lead to spurious values for MCHC when electronic cell counters are used.     

Efficacy and safety of oral ridogrel in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: two multicentre, randomized, double-blind studies

BACKGROUND: Ridogrel at low doses inhibits thromboxane synthase. Oral ridogrel, from 5 mg once daily to 150 mg twice daily, improves the endoscopic appearance of colonic mucosa and clinical manifestations in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. AIM: One US trial and one international trial were conducted to determine the effect of ridogrel on mild to severe active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Two 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trials were conducted. A US trial compared 0.5 mg, 2.5 mg and 5 mg of ridogrel once daily with placebo. An international trial compared 0.5 mg of ridogrel once daily with 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg of ridogrel once daily and 800 mg of mesalazine (known as mesalamine in the USA) three times daily. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of complete remission. RESULTS: In the US trial, complete remission was achieved in 20.8% of patients in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, 17.9% in the 2.5 mg ridogrel group, 20.6% in the 5.0 mg ridogrel group and 13.6% in the placebo group. In the international trial, 14.4% of patients in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, 19.6% in the 2.5 mg ridogrel group, 19.4% in the 5.0 mg ridogrel group and 16.4% in the mesalazine group experienced complete remission. In the international trial, rates of complete remission at the end-point were greater in the 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg ridogrel groups than in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the US trial, rates of complete remission at the end-point were greater in the 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg ridogrel groups than in the placebo group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Approximately 30% of the patients in each group discontinued treatment before the 12-week end-point owing to a lack of therapeutic response. All doses of ridogrel were well tolerated and comparable with placebo or mesalazine in terms of safety. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the primary efficacy outcome measure were found between either the 2.5 mg or the 5.0 mg dose of ridogrel and placebo in the US trial and between either the 2.5 mg or the 5.0 mg dose of ridogrel and the 0.5 mg dose of ridogrel, a surrogate dose for placebo, in the international trial. There was no clear indication in either trial of an effective dose of ridogrel in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.     

Noonan's and DiGeorge syndromes with monosomy 22q11

A boy with the dysmorphic features of Noonan's syndrome and pulmonary valve stenosis who had evidence of hypoparathyroidism and abnormal T lymphocyte numbers in the neonatal period is reported. He had a normal karyotype but molecular analysis revealed a submicroscopic deletion within chromosome 22q11, the region deleted in DiGeorge syndrome. Thus this child has both Noonan's syndrome and DiGeorge syndrome; 22q11 is a candidate region for a gene defective in Noonan's syndrome.