Three approaches to surgical treatment of traumatic disruption of the thoracic aorta

Traumatic disruption of the thoracic aorta is said to occur most often near the aortic isthmus because of the mechanisms of aortic injury. Between November 1990 and August 1999, we encountered eight cases of surgical treatment for traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta combined with multi-system injury. In some cases, the injury was located near the aortic isthmus; in such cases, we selected surgical options that made use of three different approaches, namely, media sternotomy, posterolateral left thoracotomy, and anteroaxillal thoracotomy. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. In selecting an appropriate approach, it is not only necessary to consider the various features of the approach itself, but it is also necessary to consider other factors, such as the assisting apparatus in use, the effects of other injuries sustained by perioperative positioning, safety measures against accidental bleeding during surgery, deployment of the operative field, and potential complications after surgery.     

Chronological observation of surgically‐treated granuloma faciale implies the necessity of circumspect management for perinasal nodular subset

Granuloma faciale (GF) is a rare chronic dermatosis with still unknown etiopathology, which usually presents a solitary, asymptomatic, smooth reddish‐brown to violaceous plaques or nodules on the face. Various therapeutic approaches, including topical application of corticosteroid or tacrolimus and removal with laser, cryotherapy and surgery have been attempted; however, the outcome has been inconsistent. Herein, we report a case of perinasal nodular GF who repeatedly underwent surgical excisions after the failure of laser treatment. Despite its nomenclature, GF does not manifest granulomatous tissue and the lesion is histopathologically characterized by dense dermal cell infiltration devoid of granulomatous changes and not distinguished by a clear border, which partially explains the difficulty of complete removal in our case. Review of the published work delineated that GF could be largely divided into two clinical subsets: plaque and nodular types. The plaque type GF could be responsive to topical tacrolimus, an approach preferentially adopted nowadays, while nodular type GF was often resistant to topical therapies and required surgical or laser removal. The latter subset often arose around the nose. For this location, surgical excision with sufficient removal margin is sometimes technically difficult when an aesthetically acceptable outcome is expected, explaining the basis for local recurrence. Postoperative recurrence could be observed after years of disease‐free period. These observations indicated that the need for respective treatment strategies for the management of distinctive GF subsets. Of note, a multidisciplinary approach combining radical resection and additional supportive intervention with long‐term follow up may be required for perinasal and nodular GF.