The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus regarding how frequently BRCA mutation carriers should be screened for malignancies using breast imaging techniques. An interval malignancy is defined as a malignancy that becomes evident during the period between annual screening mammography scans; the finding of such a malignancy indicates that the malignancy either went undetected by the last breast imaging scan or developed during the interval since that last scan. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all BRCA mutation carriers who were followed by the genetic counselor at the Columbia-Presbyterian Comprehensive Breast Center (New York, NY) between September 1995 and September 2002. RESULTS: Thirteen BRCA mutation carriers elected to undergo close surveillance and thus were followed at our institution. Three of these 13 patients (23%) did not develop breast carcinoma, 4 (31%) developed breast carcinoma that was detected at the time of annual screening, and 6 (46%) developed palpable interval malignancies in less than 12 months. Among the six patients who developed interval malignancies, the mean time between the last screening mammogram and disease presentation was 5.1 months (range, 2-9 months); the average tumor size in this patient subgroup was 1.7 cm (range, 0.8-3 cm). Two of these six patients had ductal carcinoma in situ, whereas the remaining four had invasive breast carcinoma; three patients had positive lymph nodes at presentation. All six patients who developed interval disease exhibited dense breast tissue on the previous mammogram. Focused breast ultrasonography was able to identify the tumor mass in 3 of 4 patients (75%). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of all BRCA-positive women who chose to undergo close surveillance in the current study developed malignant disease less than a year after exhibiting normal findings on screening mammography. Half of these interval malignancies were positive for lymph node involvement. These results suggest that strong consideration should be given to screening BRCA-positive women at more frequent intervals and to using additional imaging techniques, such as breast ultrasonography and/or breast magnetic resonance imaging, as a part of this screening.     

Association of pesticide exposure with neurologic dysfunction and disease

Poisoning by acute high-level exposure to certain pesticides has well-known neurotoxic effects, but whether chronic exposure to moderate levels of pesticides is also neurotoxic is more controversial. Most studies of moderate pesticide exposure have found increased prevalence of neurologic symptoms and changes in neurobehavioral performance, reflecting cognitive and psychomotor dysfunction. There is less evidence that moderate exposure is related to deficits in sensory or motor function or peripheral nerve conduction, but fewer studies have considered these outcomes. It is possible that the most sensitive manifestation of pesticide neurotoxicity is a general malaise lacking in specificity and related to mild cognitive dysfunction, similar to that described for Gulf War syndrome. Most studies have focused on organophosphate insecticides, but some found neurotoxic effects from other pesticides, including fungicides, fumigants, and organochlorine and carbamate insecticides. Pesticide exposure may also be associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease; several classes of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides, have been implicated. Studies of other neurodegenerative diseases are limited and inconclusive. Future studies will need to improve assessment of pesticide exposure in individuals and consider the role of genetic susceptibility. More studies of pesticides other than organophosphates are needed. Major unresolved issues include the relative importance of acute and chronic exposure, the effect of moderate exposure in the absence of poisoning, and the relationship of pesticide-related neurotoxicity to neurodegenerative disease.     

Motivational effects mu- and kappa-opioid agonists following acute and chronic restraint stress: involvement of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors

The influence of both acute and chronic restraint stress on the rewarding properties of morphine (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg i.p.) and the aversive effects of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg i.p. x3 or 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) or bremazocine (0.4 mg/kg i.p.) was investigated. An acute (2 h) but not chronic restraint (2 h daily for 7 days) enhanced the morphine place preference, and elicited a place aversion with a subthreshold dose of bremazocine. This enhancing effect on the reinforcing properties induced by the drugs was prevented by either R(+)-SCH-23390 hydrochloride (R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H3-benzazepine, 30 microg/kg i.p.) or (+/-)-sulpiride (60 mg/kg i.p.), 10-20 min prior to the stress session. Naltrexone pretreatment (1 mg/kg i.p.) abolished the stress effect on morphine place preference but not that on bremazocine aversion. Instead, nor-BNI (30 microg/3 microl i.c.v.) abolished the stress's effects on bremazocine aversion, but did not modify those on morphine preference. These results show that: (1) acute stress enhanced the morphine and bremazocine conditioned reinforcing effects meanwhile chronic stress did not modify them; (2) the stimulation of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors is necessary for the development of restraint stress-induced sensitization to the conditioned reinforcing effects of drugs; and (3) the stimulation mu/delta- and kappa-opioid receptors seems to be differentially involved.     

Case report: severe juvenile type paracoccidioidomycosis with hepatitis C

We present the case of a 34-year-old man with previous history of hepatitis C and severe juvenile type of paracoccidioidomycosis characterized by involvement of the reticuloendothelial system, eosinophilia, lung compromise (pleural effusion), retinal hemorrhage, and blood culture positive to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. The immune evaluation showed four precipitation lines to P. brasiliensis by the double immunodiffusion test. Treatment with amphotericin B and itraconazol resulted in resolution of the disease.     

Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy,Biologic Therapy,Endocrine Therapy,or Active Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic

PurposeProvide real-world data regarding the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality in breast cancer (BC) patients on active cancer treatment.MethodsClinical data were abstracted from the 3778 BC patients seen at a multisite cancer center in New York between February 1, 2020 and May 1, 2020, including patient demographics, tumor histology, cancer treatment, and SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by treatment type (chemotherapy [CT] vs endocrine and/or HER2 directed therapy [E/H]) was compared by Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting. In those diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, Mann–Whitney test was used to a assess risk factors for severe disease and mortality.ResultsThree thousand sixty-two patients met study inclusion criteria with 641 patients tested for SARS-COV-2 by RT-PCR or serology. Overall, 64 patients (2.1%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by either serology, RT-PCR, or documented clinical diagnosis. Comparing matched patients who received chemotherapy (n = 379) with those who received non-cytotoxic therapies (n = 2343) the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 did not differ between treatment groups (weighted risk; 3.5% CT vs 2.7% E/H, P = .523). Twenty-seven patients (0.9%) expired over follow-up, with 10 deaths attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chemotherapy was not associated with increased risk for death following SARS-CoV-2 infection (weighted risk; 0.7% CT vs 0.1% E/H, P = .246). Advanced disease (stage IV), age, BMI, and Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score were associated with increased mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection (P ≤ .05).ConclusionBC treatment, including chemotherapy, can be safely administered in the context of enhanced infectious precautions, and should not be withheld particularly when given for curative intent.     

Perceptions of hyperbaric oxygen therapy among podiatrists practicing in high‐risk foot clinics

Foot ulceration is a devastating and costly consequence of diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is recognised as an adjunctive therapy to treat diabetes‐related foot ulceration, yet uptake is low. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 16 podiatrists who manage patients with foot ulcers related to diabetes to explore their perceptions of, and the barriers/facilitators to, referral for hyperbaric oxygen. Podiatrists cited logistical issues such as location of facilities as well as poor communication pathways, lack of delegation and lack of follow up when patients presented for hyperbaric treatment. In general, podiatrists had an understanding of the premise of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and evidence to support its use but could only provide very limited citations of key papers and guidelines to support their position. Podiatrists stated that they felt a patient was lost from their care when referred for hyperbaric oxygen and that aftercare might not be adequate. Improved referral and delegation pathways for patients presenting for hyperbaric oxygen, as well as the provision of easily accessible evidence to support this therapy, could help to increase podiatrists’ confidence in deciding whether or not to recommend their patients for hyperbaric oxygen therapy.