The influence of lipophilicity on the pharmacokinetic behavior of drugs: Concepts and examples

In this review, we first examine the contextual background of structure–pharmacokinetic relationships. Some concepts in drug disposition are briefly recalled, and inherent difficulties instructure–pharmacokinetic relationships are outlined. Lipophilicity is then investigated in the light of the intermolecular and intramolecular interactions it encodes. In the main body of the review, a number of pharmacokinetic processes are examined for their relations with lipophilicity. These processes are taken in a logical sequence of permeation, absorption (intestine, skin, cornea, brain), plasma protein binding, tissue distribution, volume of distribution and renal clearance. Relations between metabolism and lipophilicity are more complex, since biotransformation involves both low-energy (enzyme binding) and high-energy (catalysis) processes. Only the former may be related to lipophilicity. The conclusion argues against faulty statistics and over-interpretation. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Evaluation of PCR-restriction profile analysis and IS2404 restriction fragment length polymorphism and amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting for identification and typing of Mycobacterium ulcerans and M. marinum

Mycobacterium ulcerans and M. marinum are emerging necrotizing mycobacterial pathogens that reside in common reservoirs of infection and exhibit striking pathophysiological similarities. Furthermore, the interspecific taxonomic relationship between the two species is not clear as a result of the very high phylogenetic relatedness (i.e., >99.8% 16S rRNA sequence similarity), in contrast to only 25 to 47% DNA relatedness. To help understand the genotypic affiliation between these two closely related species, we performed a comparative analysis including PCR restriction profile analysis (PRPA), IS2404 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) on a set of M. ulcerans (n = 29) and M. marinum (n = 28) strains recovered from different geographic origins. PRPA was based on a triple restriction of the 3' end region of 16S rRNA, which differentiated M. ulcerans into three types; however, the technique could not distinguish M. marinum from M. ulcerans isolates originating from South America and Southeast Asia. RFLP based on IS2404 produced six M. ulcerans types related to six geographic regions and did not produce any band with M. marinum, confirming the previous findings of Chemlal et al. (K. Chemlal, K. DeRidder, P. A. Fonteyne, W. M. Meyers, J. Swings, and F. Portaels, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 64:270-273, 2001). AFLP analysis resulted in profiles which grouped M. ulcerans and M. marinum into two separate clusters. The numerical analysis also revealed subgroups among the M. marinum and M. ulcerans isolates. In conclusion, PRPA appears to provide a rapid method for differentiating the African M. ulcerans type from other geographical types but is unsuitable for interspecific differentiation of M. marinum and M. ulcerans. In comparison, whole- genome techniques such as IS 2404-RFLP and AFLP appear to be far more useful in discriminating between M. marinum and M. ulcerans, and may thus be promising molecular tools for the differential diagnosis of infections caused by these two species.     

Postoperative high-dose pelvic radiotherapy for N+ prostate cancer: Toxicity and matched case comparison with postoperative prostate bed-only radiotherapy

Purpose

To report on toxicity of postoperative high-dose whole-pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) with androgen deprivation therapy for lymph node metastasized (N1) prostate cancer (PC). To perform a matched-case analysis to compare this toxicity profile to postoperative prostate bed-only radiotherapy (PBRT).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight N1-PC patients were referred for WPRT and 239 node-negative patients for PBRT. Patients were matched 1:1 according to pre-treatment demographics, symptoms, treatment and tumor characteristics. Mean dose to the prostate bed was 75 Gy (WPRT–PBRT) and 54 Gy to the elective nodes (WPRT) in 36 or 37 fractions. End points are genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity.

Results

After WPRT, 35% developed grade 2 (G2) and 4% G3 acute GU toxicity. Acute GI toxicity developed in 42% (G2). Late GU toxicity developed in 36% (G2) and 7% (G3). One patient had G4 incontinence. Recuperation occurred in 59%. Late GI toxicity developed in 25% (G2) with 100% recuperation. Incidence of acute and late GI toxicity was higher following WPRT compared to PBRT (p ? 0.041). GU toxicity was similar. With WPRT mean dose to bladder and rectosigmoid were higher.

Conclusions

Postoperative high-dose WPRT comes at the cost of a temporary increase in G2. GI toxicity compared to PBRT because larger volumes of rectosigmoid are irradiated.     

Effect of agomelatine in the chronic mild stress model of depression in the rat.

Chronic mild stress (CMS), a well-validated model of depression, was used to study the effects of the melatonin agonist and selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist agomelatine (S 20098) in comparison with melatonin, imipramine, and fluoxetine. All drugs were administered either 2 h before (evening treatment) or 2 h after (morning treatment) the dark phase of the 12-h light/dark cycle. Chronic (5 weeks) evening treatment with agomelatine or melatonin (both at 10 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently reversed the CMS-induced reduction in sucrose consumption. The magnitude and time course of the action of both drugs was comparable to that of imipramine and fluoxetine (both at 10 mg/kg i.p.); however, melatonin was less active than agomelatine at this dose. The effect of evening administration of agomelatine and melatonin was completely inhibited by an acute injection of the MT(1)/MT(2) antagonist, S 22153 (20 mg/kg i.p.), while the antagonist had no effect in animals receiving fluoxetine or imipramine. When the drugs were administered in the morning, agomelatine caused effects similar to those observed after evening treatment (with onset of action faster than imipramine) but melatonin was ineffective. Moreover, melatonin antagonist, S 22153, did not modify the intakes in stressed animals receiving morning administration of agomelatine and in any other control and stressed groups tested in this study. These data demonstrate antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine in the rat CMS model of depression, which was independent of the time of drug administration. The efficacy of agomelatine is comparable to that of imipramine and fluoxetine, but greater than that of melatonin, which had no antidepressant-like activity after morning administration. While the evening efficacy of agomelatine can be related to its melatonin receptors agonistic properties, its morning activity, which was not inhibited by a melatonin antagonist, indicates that these receptors are certainly required, but not sufficient to sustain the agomelatine efficacy. It is therefore suggested that the antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine depends on some combination of its melatonin agonist and 5-HT(2C) antagonist properties.     

Late radiotherapy-induced lower intestinal toxicity (RILIT) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the need for adapting toxicity scales and the appearance of the sigmoid colon as co-responsible organ for lower intestinal toxicity.

PURPOSE: To report on: 1. Late radiotherapy-induced lower intestinal toxicity (RILIT) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. 2. The correlation between late RILIT and volume parameters of the rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 241 patients with a follow-up of >or=18 months for this analysis. Late RILIT consisted of 8 different symptoms, comprising the 5 symptoms from the RTOG toxicity score supplemented with urgency, fecal incontinence and anal pain. Late RILIT and late RTOG toxicity were scored prospectively and correlated with: 1. Different rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel volume parameters. 2. Patient-related morbidity. We calculated the median, quartile and percentiles for the different volume parameters and correlated them with grade 1-3 late RILIT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 42 months. Three patients developed grade 3 red blood loss. We registered grade 2 RILIT and RTOG toxicity in 13% and 10%, respectively, the most frequent grade 1 symptom being fecal urgency. The intermediate rectal volume parameters were significantly correlated with late RILIT. We were able to calculate cut-off dose-volume histograms (DVHs) that predict for grade 0-2 RILIT. CONCLUSIONS: After IMRT for prostate cancer, the overall incidence of grade >or=2 RILIT is low. Cut-off DVHs can be used for patient counseling.     

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: late morbidity and results on biochemical control.

PURPOSE: To report on late morbidity and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2005 133 patients were treated with IMRT for T(1-4) N0 M0 prostate cancer. The median follow-up time was 36 months. In a first cohort, patients received a median planning target volume (PTV) dose of 74 Gy with a hard constraint on maximum rectum dose of 72 Gy (74R72, n=51). Later, median PTV and maximum rectum dose were increased to 76 and 74 Gy, respectively (76R74; n=82). We defined low-risk (n=20), intermediate-risk (n=70) and high-risk (n=43) groups. Androgen deprivation was given to patients in the intermediate- and high-risk group. Late gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) morbidity and biochemical relapse, in accordance with the ASTRO consensus, were recorded. RESULTS: We observed grade 2 GI (17%) and GU (19%), grade 3 GI (1%) and GU (3%) late toxicities. Except for hematuria, the median duration of side-effects was 6 months. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) at 3 and 5 years was 88% and 83%, respectively, with a significantly better 3-year bRSF for the 76R74 than for the 74R72 group (p=0.01). Five-year bRFS for patients in the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk group was 100%, 94% and 74%, respectively (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: IMRT for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer combines low morbidity with excellent biochemical control.     

In vivo validation of PAX2 as a target for renal cancer therapy

PAX genes are frequently overexpressed in human cancer tissue and appear to contribute to the tumor phenotype, suggesting that they may be potential targets for cancer therapy. In particular, aberrant PAX2 expression has been reported in a high proportion of primary tumors, including the majority of renal cell carcinomas (RCC). We recently demonstrated that PAX2 suppresses cisplatin-induced apoptosis in cultured RCC cells. We hypothesized that silencing of PAX2 expression might partially overcome the notorious resistance of renal cell carcinomas to chemotherapy in vivo. In this report, we show that a PAX2 shRNA successfully knocks down PAX2 mRNA and protein levels in an RCC cell line (ACHN). ACHN cells stably transfected with shRNAs targeted against the PAX2 homeodomain are 3-6-fold more susceptible to cisplatin-induced caspase-3 activation than control ACHN cells line. Furthermore, growth of subcutaneous ACHN/shPAX2 xenografts in nude mice is significantly more responsive to cisplatin therapy than control ACHN cell tumors. Our observations validate PAX2 as a potential therapeutic gene target in renal cancer and suggest that adjunctive PAX2 knockdown may enhance the efficacy of other chemotherapeutic agents.