Checklist para pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en consulta telemática

Las circunstancias actuales provocadas por la COVID-19 nos obligan a los profesionales de atención primaria a idear nuevas formas de garantizar la atención sanitaria de nuestros pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2). Existen evidencias que respaldan la eficacia de la telemedicina en el control glucémico de los pacientes con DM2. Ante la rápida adaptación de la práctica clínica al uso de la telemedicina, el Grupo de Trabajo de Diabetes de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria (SemFyC) optó por elaborar un documento de consenso plasmado en un algoritmo de actuación/seguimiento telemático en la atención de los pacientes con DM2.Palabras clave: Telemedicina, Diabetes mellitus tipo 2, COVID-19     

RV Fractional Area Change and TAPSE as Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Pulmonary Hypertension: A CMR Study

Background

The right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is a surrogate marker of right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension (PH), but its measurement is complicated and time consuming. The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measures only the longitudinal component of RV contraction while the right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) takes into account both the longitudinal and the transversal components. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between RVEF, RVFAC, and TAPSE according to hemodynamic severity in two groups of patients with PH: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Methods and Results

Fifty-four patients with PAH (n?=?15) and CTEPH (n?=?39) underwent right heart catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The ventricular volumes and areas, TAPSE, and eccentricity index were measured. The RVFAC was more strongly correlated with the RVEF (r?=?0.81, p?<?0.0001) than the TAPSE (r?=?0.63, p?<?0.0001). RVEF?<?35% was better predicted by the RVFAC than the TAPSE (TAPSE: AUC?=?0.77 and RVFAC: AUC?=?0.91; p?=?0.042). In the group with the worse hemodynamic status, the RVFAC correlated much better with the RVEF than the TAPSE. There were no significant differences in the CMR data analyzed between the groups of PAH and CETPH patients.

Conclusions

The RVFAC is a good index to estimate RVEF in PH patients; even better than the TAPSE in patients with more severe hemodynamic profile, possibly for including the transversal component of right ventricular function in its measurement. Furthermore, RVFAC performance was similar in the two PH groups (PAH and CTEPH).

     

Economic assessment of different administration modes for total parenteral nutrition

AIM: Total parenteral nutrition can be administered with separate bottles or complete admixtures prepared by commercial firms, the hospital pharmacy, or hospital subcontractors. The aim of this study was to compare overall cost of total parenteral nutrition using different administration modes. METHODS: Overall production costs of hospital parenteral admixtures were calculated from five expenditures (raw materials, consumable items, annual depreciation, control costs, staff costs). Cost for the other administration modes were evaluated for an identical formula. Time spent by nurses and the cost of connecting material was estimated to determine the overall cost for one day of parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: Total cost was 46.04 euros/day with separate bottles, 50.61 euros/day for hospital preparations, 65.41 and 72.87 euros/day for industrial preparations and 82.02 euros/day for formulations prepared by subcontractors. CONCLUSION: Hospital preparations offer, for minimal outlay, an alternative for parenteral nutrition of much higher quality than the separate bottles method.